I am also experiencing issues bootstrapping new nodes in my 2.0.10
Cassandra cluster. The first attempt to bootstrap ALWAYS fails, followed
by a second bootstrap attempt that ALWAYS succeeds.
The first attempt at bootstrapping fails with:
INFO [main] 2015-03-15 02:41:02,550 StorageService.java
This seemed to be due to a bug with how metric names are converted to file
system paths. os.path.join() is used, but the metric path converts into an
absolute path (e.g /org/apache/cassandra). This means you end up doing
something like:
os.path.join('/opt/graphite/storage/whatever', '/org/apach
Awesome! Thanks!
-Karl
> On Sep 12, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
>
>> On 09/12/2014 01:50 PM, Karl Rieb wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wondering when 2.0.10 will be available through the datastax apt repository?
>
> I'll have 2.0.10 deb/rpm packages i
Hi,
Wondering when 2.0.10 will be available through the datastax apt repository?
-Karl
Hood <0x6e6...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Karl Rieb wrote:
>> > Can now be followed at:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7576.
>>
>> Nice work! Finally we have a proper solution to this issue, so well done to
>>
Can now be followed at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7576
.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Karl Rieb wrote:
> Will do!
>
> On Jul 19, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Robert Stupp wrote:
>
> Can you submit a ticket in C* JIRA at issues.apache.org?
>
> --
> Se
Will do!
> On Jul 19, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Robert Stupp wrote:
>
> Can you submit a ticket in C* JIRA at issues.apache.org?
>
> --
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> Am 19.07.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Karl Rieb :
>>
>> Ben! I think I have an idea of exactly w
;
This way we do a check for DataType on the base type of reversed columns!
I applied the fix to my 2.0.9 cassandra node and the errors go away!
Could you guys please make this single-word fix?
-Karl
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ben Hood <0x6e6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On
be providing patches to these
issues.
I will post to the Datastax java driver mailing list and see if they are
willing to add a patch.
-Karl
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 3:59 AM, Ben Hood <0x6e6...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Karl Rieb wrote:
>>
Hi,
I've been testing an in-place upgrade of a 1.2.11 cluster to 2.0.9. The
1.2.11 nodes all have a schema defined through CQL with existing data
before I perform the rolling upgrade. While the upgrade is in progress,
services are continuing to read and write data to the cluster (strictly
using
10 matches
Mail list logo
