>
>
> dest="added" style="stylesheets/add_versioning_information.xslt"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I also set the antcont
t Users List
> Betreff: Re: AW: Converting new or changed files with an
> batch file called from within ant
>
> Huditsch Roman wrote:
>
> >Hi Jim,
> >
> >Thanks a lot for your solution.
> >I'll straigth dive into it tomorrow morning.
> >Thanks!
> >
Huditsch Roman wrote:
>Hi Jim,
>
>Thanks a lot for your solution.
>I'll straigth dive into it tomorrow morning.
>Thanks!
>
>
>
a few caveats...u have to download ant-contribs jar and make it
available to Ant (usually this means putting it in ant's lib...though I
would suggest putting into a sep
Betreff: RE: Converting new or changed files with an batch
> file called from within ant
>
> > From: Huditsch Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The proplem is taht everytime I start the transformation,
> all files of
> my
> > input folder are converted.
> > I woul
-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lexisnexis.at
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: James Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. April 2005 16:10
> An: Ant Users List
> Betreff: Re: Converting new or changed files with an batch
> file called from within a
you could do something like
Transform not required
> From: Huditsch Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The proplem is taht everytime I start the transformation, all files of
my
> input folder are converted.
> I would like ant to just produce new or changed files (since the last
> transformation call).
> the source folder is specified within my batch
>The is making my go crazy...I don't get it to work in the way I
>want.
>I would like to transform just those files in "source" which have been altered
>in respect to the "result" directory
>But the above statement is setting "xmlBuild.notRequired" if one file has been
>altered, which
Hi James,
I tried to incorporate your suggestions, but I think I just made it to a
certain extent
http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/
gives u etc...generally you should resort to such things
after you have exhausted all other meansthough the nice thing with
using Ant as Controller is that you will continue to tweak (as with a
build) to satisfy constantly changing requirements.
gl, Jim F
Huditsch Roman wrote:
>Hi James,
>
>As you may have seen by my previous posts on the list,
>I managed to make some progress :)))
>
>
>
its great to see you getting the hang of things...though there are many
refactoring opportunities with your build file
a) instead of creating one large target,
Hi James,
As you may have seen by my previous posts on the list,
I managed to make some progress :)))
> check out the manual page for all options
> http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/style.html
I was able to define my definitions in a working way at least:
The only issue to solve is now
Hi James,
Thank you very much for the quick reply.
> why not control Saxon directly from Ant ?
Would be nice. I am just uncertain how to do this properly ;)
> You can use the Ant task or use to invoke
> saxon...which may or may not have the built in up to date
> checking you desire
hmm, I t
Huditsch Roman wrote:
>Hi list,
>
>Although I search the archives, I could not find any useful hint for my
>problem.
>I recently started using ant for controlling my XSLT transformations.
>Actually, I need ant to take control over the execution of the appropriate
>batch file for a given target.
Hi list,
Although I search the archives, I could not find any useful hint for my problem.
I recently started using ant for controlling my XSLT transformations.
Actually, I need ant to take control over the execution of the appropriate
batch file for a given target.
These target-specific batch-fil
15 matches
Mail list logo
