Re :Re: Re :Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-06-01 Thread query
Thanks for reformatting the mail.I tried with task. It works better.On Mon, 28 May 2007 19:32:21 -0400 \"Ant Users List\" wroteIt was a bit hard to read your email. Please set your email to sendonly text formated emails to this list. Otherwise, they get munged andit\'s hard to see what

Re: Re :Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-28 Thread David Weintraub
May 2007 07:50:33 -0400 Subject: Re :Re: Building Dependent targets To avoid rebuilding of targets if they occur as dependent targets for many targets, I tried using task. My requirement is that I am having different targets in all build files for copying source, compiling java files, and crea

Re :Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-28 Thread query
To avoid rebuilding of targets if they occur as dependent targets for many targets, I tried using task.My requirement is that I am having different targets in all build files for copying source,compiling java files and creating jar files. Each build file will be having all the above

Re :Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-28 Thread query
27;s build time.Is there any task to ensure that the>>> dependent targets once built will not  be built again >>> >>>> If you\'re willing to reorganise you build targets into different>> projects,>> the technique described here can help:>>>> http://www.exubero.com/

Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-25 Thread Gilles Scokart
less. > > thanks > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Building-Dependent-

Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread David Weintraub
Two things: Ant will show the task as being executed, but may not actually carry out the task. For example, you may see a task being executed when you have the debug flag on, but the copy itself might not be done. Of course, a target will always be executed even if the tasks in it don't have to

Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread Doug Lochart
Joe Schmetzer wrote: On Thu, 24 May, 2007 12:46 pm, query wrote: Earlier I was using some other build tool to build my project. Here if a target is built and if the same target is used to build some other target, it compares the timestamp and will not build the dependent targets again. As I s

Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread Joe Schmetzer
On Thu, 24 May, 2007 12:46 pm, query wrote: > Earlier I was using some other build tool to build my project. Here if a > target is built and if the same target is used to build some other target, > it compares the timestamp and will not build the dependent targets again. > As I started working on A

Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread Matt Benson
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > query wrote: > > Earlier I was using some other build tool to build > my project. Here if a target is built and if the > same target is used to build some other target, it > compares the timestamp and will not build the > dependent targets again. >

Re :Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread query
As you have mentioned, time stamp comparision will be done at the task level tasks like . But in a target, I will be defininig many tasks like ,,,,,, etcSo my concern is instead of repeatedly checking the tasks whether they are already bui

Re: Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
query wrote: Earlier I was using some other build tool to build my project. Here if a target is built and if the same target is used to build some other target, it compares the timestamp and will not build the dependent targets again. Ant doesnt compare the timestamps on targets, but it looks

Building Dependent targets

2007-05-24 Thread query
Earlier I was using some other build tool to build my project. Here if a target is built and if the same target is used to build some other target, it compares the timestamp and will not build the dependent targets again. As I started working on ANT, I found it very useful and intersting. But in