On 07/07/2015 01:51 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
I've briefly spoken to Fraser about your e-mail this morning, and I'm
afraid that we've determined that it's not feasible to backport the
Linux desktop integration refactor project (including the port to GDK).
It depends heavily on many of the other
Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Is there a bug report for the "can't launch from installer" issue?
http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12876
Hanson notes there that this was fixed in v6.7rc3, but in my experience
this has been fixed in v7.x only. Maybe that was a typo on Hanson's
part; either w
On 2015-07-05 19:42, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/05/2015 10:18 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> I've never been able to launch from the installer window, and I've
> rather given up trying.
This was fixed several months ago with some of the GDK improvements
Fraser implemented in v7.
But hasn't been
On 7/6/2015 2:37 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 06/07/15 22:33, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 7/6/2015 1:35 PM, Richmond wrote:
unfortunately, the Quality Control Center, along
with all the other bits of RunRev's site seem to be "down the tubes"
again, whether because
of DDoS or something else, I don't know
On 06/07/15 22:33, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 7/6/2015 1:35 PM, Richmond wrote:
unfortunately, the Quality Control Center, along
with all the other bits of RunRev's site seem to be "down the tubes"
again, whether because
of DDoS or something else, I don't know.
Yeah, I noticed that too while try
On 7/6/2015 1:35 PM, Richmond wrote:
unfortunately, the Quality Control Center, along
with all the other bits of RunRev's site seem to be "down the tubes"
again, whether because
of DDoS or something else, I don't know.
Yeah, I noticed that too while trying to update a bug report. I think
it's
AND, real or imaginary insults aside, unfortunately, the Quality Control
Center, along
with all the other bits of RunRev's site seem to be "down the tubes"
again, whether because
of DDoS or something else, I don't know.
Which is a very great pity as I was going to add some more info about
bug
On 06/07/15 20:11, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
> On 05/07/15 20:18, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> I believe both the RQCC being down and the bug itself may be related
>> to the recent DDoS attack. I'm unable to reproduce this issue this
>> morning under Ubuntu 14.10. I would try again
Richmond wrote:
> On 05/07/15 20:18, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> I believe both the RQCC being down and the bug itself may be related
>> to the recent DDoS attack. I'm unable to reproduce this issue this
>> morning under Ubuntu 14.10. I would try again while the servers
>> appear to be working
On 2015-07-05 18:43, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/05/2015 10:10 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Are your pull requests specific to v6.x, or also applicable to v7 as
well?
They're generic, as in the addition of floor() and ceil().
And submitted as pull requests against the develop branch, as
requested.
On 07/05/2015 10:10 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Are your pull requests specific to v6.x, or also applicable to v7 as well?
They're generic, as in the addition of floor() and ceil().
And submitted as pull requests against the develop branch, as requested.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
_
On 07/05/2015 10:18 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> I've never been able to launch from the installer window, and I've
> rather given up trying.
This was fixed several months ago with some of the GDK improvements
Fraser implemented in v7.
But hasn't been backported to LC6, i.e., it still doesn'
On 05/07/15 20:22, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
On 05/07/15 20:10, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/04/2015 11:46 AM, Richmond wrote:
Are there features in the 6.7 series that have not yet been
incorporated
into the 7.0 series? (seems unlikely and slightly odd).
No,
On 05/07/15 20:18, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 09:27 AM, Richmond wrote:
>
>> Bug report 15574
>
> I tried to add info to the bug report, but the quality center is down
> right now. I managed to launch both commercial and community 6.7.6
> builds on my 64-bit linux M
Richmond wrote:
On 05/07/15 20:10, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/04/2015 11:46 AM, Richmond wrote:
Are there features in the 6.7 series that have not yet been
incorporated
into the 7.0 series? (seems unlikely and slightly odd).
No, quite the opposite. I *am* annoyed that s
Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 09:27 AM, Richmond wrote:
>
>> Bug report 15574
>
> I tried to add info to the bug report, but the quality center is down
> right now. I managed to launch both commercial and community 6.7.6
> builds on my 64-bit linux Mint 17 system.
I believe both the RQCC be
On 05/07/15 20:10, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/04/2015 11:46 AM, Richmond wrote:
Are there features in the 6.7 series that have not yet been
incorporated
into the 7.0 series? (seems unlikely and slightly odd).
No, quite the opposite. I *am* annoyed that some of the additi
Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/04/2015 11:46 AM, Richmond wrote:
Are there features in the 6.7 series that have not yet been incorporated
into the 7.0 series? (seems unlikely and slightly odd).
No, quite the opposite. I *am* annoyed that some of the additions I've
contributed to the engine have not
On 07/04/2015 11:46 AM, Richmond wrote:
Now for a fairly naive question, but possibly not half as daft as it seems:
What is the point of the 6.7 series when the 7.0 series is
up-and-running smoothly?
Just my experience, but I find the 7.0 releases slow and buggy on linux.
The binaries are hu
On 04/07/15 20:57, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 07/04/2015 09:27 AM, Richmond wrote:
Bug report 15574
I tried to add info to the bug report, but the quality center is down
right now. I managed to launch both commercial and community 6.7.6
builds on my 64-bit linux Mint 17 system. I've never been a
On 07/04/2015 09:27 AM, Richmond wrote:
Bug report 15574
I tried to add info to the bug report, but the quality center is down
right now. I managed to launch both commercial and community 6.7.6
builds on my 64-bit linux Mint 17 system. I've never been able to launch
from the installer windo
On 04/07/15 18:43, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On 2015-07-04 09:56, Richmond wrote:
On 01/07/15 16:28, Sebastien Nouat wrote:
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.7.6 and 7.0.6
Stable. This release is a stable release, in which all the bugs
fixed in the .6 versio
On 2015-07-04 09:56, Richmond wrote:
On 01/07/15 16:28, Sebastien Nouat wrote:
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.7.6 and 7.0.6
Stable. This release is a stable release, in which all the bugs fixed
in the .6 versions are now stable. The list of bugs fixed
On 01/07/15 16:28, Sebastien Nouat wrote:
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.7.6 and 7.0.6
Stable. This release is a stable release, in which all the bugs fixed
in the .6 versions are now stable. The list of bugs fixed in those
versions can be found in the
Sebastien - from where I am, it is NOT TRUE that this update can be obtained by
“check for updates”, at least not from the Mac version of LC 7.0.6 (rc1) on
Yosemite 10.10.3. I think this problem existed for the last update as well.
What’s going on?
Graham
> On 1 Jul 2015, at 15:28, Sebastien N
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.7.6 and 7.0.6
Stable. This release is a stable release, in which all the bugs fixed in
the .6 versions are now stable. The list of bugs fixed in those versions
can be found in the Release Notes (in the RC 1, RC 2 and RC 3-
26 matches
Mail list logo
