I find the text images generated by this thread to be slightly disturbing,
but
http://memestorage.com/_nw/80/45602520.jpg
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Bob Sneidar >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > So I guess what I am saying is that I really appreciat
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Bob Sneidar
wrote:
>
> So I guess what I am saying is that I really appreciate the difficulty of
> what the LC developers have done. I think the real key was to not try and
> create an entirely new application in the process of refactoring the
> existing code. Mo
That is to say, an irrational one. ;-)
Bob S
On Oct 27, 2015, at 11:40 , Mark Waddingham
mailto:m...@livecode.com>> wrote:
On 2015-10-27 19:36, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2015-10-27 19:22, Richmond wrote:
Morellos.
I had morello cherry pie for dessert the other night... It was delicious :)
Per
On 2015-10-27 19:36, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2015-10-27 19:22, Richmond wrote:
Morellos.
I had morello cherry pie for dessert the other night... It was
delicious :)
Perhaps I should have written - 'morello cherry pi' - it put my
taste-buds into a transcendental state.
Mark.
--
Mark Wa
On 2015-10-27 19:22, Richmond wrote:
Morellos.
I had morello cherry pie for dessert the other night... It was delicious
:)
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode
On 27/10/15 17:25, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2015-10-27 16:23, Heather Laine wrote:
Hmmm. Do I have to add cherries to the list of things that are not
permitted to be discussed on this list?
/\
O O
That won't work though - a new synonym will just be added and used
instead ;)
Mark.
More
On 27/10/15 17:23, Heather Laine wrote:
Hmmm. Do I have to add cherries to the list of things that are not permitted to
be discussed on this list?
/\
O O
Heather
Heather Laine
Customer Services Manager
LiveCode Ltd
www.livecode.com
I'd give a lot for a glass of Kirsch at this point.
Ric
Probably one and the same thing more often than we realize.
Bob S
On Oct 27, 2015, at 07:11 , Peter M. Brigham
mailto:pmb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That's an irrational idea.
Actually, it's a transcendental idea. :-)
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
___
us
On Oct 27, 2015, at 04:34 , Mark Waddingham
mailto:m...@livecode.com>> wrote:
One of the goals of the 7.0 refactor was to move a very old, undocumented,
difficult to maintain and spaghetti-like code forward to a new model which is
cleaner, easier to maintain and more amenable to use in the way
On 10/27/2015 08:25 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
That won't work though - a new synonym will just be added and used
instead ;)
ROTFL
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this u
On 2015-10-27 16:23, Heather Laine wrote:
Hmmm. Do I have to add cherries to the list of things that are not
permitted to be discussed on this list?
/\
O O
That won't work though - a new synonym will just be added and used
instead ;)
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://w
Hmmm. Do I have to add cherries to the list of things that are not permitted to
be discussed on this list?
/\
O O
Heather
Heather Laine
Customer Services Manager
LiveCode Ltd
www.livecode.com
> On 27 Oct 2015, at 14:11, Peter M. Brigham wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 7:42 PM, Mark Wieder
On Oct 25, 2015, at 7:42 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 12:24 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
>> Make your own cherry with LCB and give the first couple of versions away
>> for free. Then somewhere just after version 3 you could sell a more
>> expensive chocolate-covered version and call it C
"If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by candlelight."
-- George Gobel
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
On Oct 25, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Rick Harrison wrote:
> Forget the cherry, we need lit candles so we can see our code better!
On 2015-10-25 12:06, Graham Samuel wrote:
The discussion about Open Language is interesting, and the idea may
well be a good thing. But I for one would rather hear that for the
actual development team, delivering a rock-solid version of LiveCode
on all supported platforms is taking a massive prio
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:10 PM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
> That's an irrational idea.
>>
>>
> Quite, but it just goes on and on..
>
We're not going to repeat this again?
:)
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
use-livecode mailing li
On 10/25/2015 6:42 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 10/25/2015 12:24 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Make your own cherry with LCB and give the first couple of versions away
for free. Then somewhere just after version 3 you could sell a more
expensive chocolate-covered version and call it Cherry Pi.
That
On 10/25/2015 12:24 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Make your own cherry with LCB and give the first couple of versions away
for free. Then somewhere just after version 3 you could sell a more
expensive chocolate-covered version and call it Cherry Pi.
That's an irrational idea.
--
Mark Wieder
ah
Forget the cherry, we need lit candles so we can see our code better! We need
candles! ;-)
Rick
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Richmond wrote:
>
> On 25/10/15 18:59, Kevin Miller wrote:
>> We did not promise a cherry. We are not going to promise a cherry. No cherry
>> is planned. We will no
On 25/10/15 21:56, Colin Holgate wrote:
Makes more sense in Monaco:
__.--~~.,-.__
`~-._.-(`-.__`-.
\`~~`
.--./ \
/# \ \.--.
\/ /# \
'--' \/
'--'
?I???II??IIII?II?I+.
Makes more sense in Monaco:
__.--~~.,-.__
`~-._.-(`-.__`-.
\`~~`
.--./ \
/# \ \.--.
\/ /# \
'--' \/
'--'
?I???II??IIII?II?I+.
888.888.O888..888 ..??I??..?
> Mark Wieder wrote:
> Can we crowd-source funding for a cherry?
> Who's with me on this?
__.--~~.,-.__
`~-._.-(`-.__`-.
\`~~`
.--./ \
/# \ \.--.
\/ /# \
'--' \/
'--'
?I???II??IIII?I
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 4:10 am, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> Can we crowd-source funding for a cherry?
> Who's with me on this?
I’m happy to donate cherries from our cherry tree but you will need to crowd
fund for the shipping from Tasmania to Edinburgh and to cover the costs of
cherry - cake integra
On 10/25/2015 12:10 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 10/25/2015 09:59 AM, Kevin Miller wrote:
We did not promise a cherry. We are not going to promise a cherry. No
cherry is planned. We will not be held accountable for non-delivery of
said item.
Can we crowd-source funding for a cherry?
Who's with me
On 25/10/15 19:10, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 10/25/2015 09:59 AM, Kevin Miller wrote:
We did not promise a cherry. We are not going to promise a cherry. No
cherry is planned. We will not be held accountable for non-delivery
of said item.
Can we crowd-source funding for a cherry?
Who's with me on
On 10/25/2015 09:59 AM, Kevin Miller wrote:
We did not promise a cherry. We are not going to promise a cherry. No cherry is
planned. We will not be held accountable for non-delivery of said item.
Can we crowd-source funding for a cherry?
Who's with me on this?
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmai
On 25/10/15 18:59, Kevin Miller wrote:
We did not promise a cherry. We are not going to promise a cherry. No cherry is
planned. We will not be held accountable for non-delivery of said item.
Now, that's odd: I'm sure the word "cherry" occurred somewhere on a
web-page that has somehow, subsequ
We did not promise a cherry. We are not going to promise a cherry. No cherry is
planned. We will not be held accountable for non-delivery of said item.
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 16:23, Richmond wrote:
>
>> On 25/10/15 17:45, Kevin Miller wrote:
>> Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Kevin Miller wrote:
>
> Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
> be fully risen before we add icing.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Everyone can create a
On 25/10/15 17:57, Martin Koob wrote:
Someone will be really cheesed off if RunRev has now made a promise of cake
with icing and it is not delivered or delivered without icing.
Martin
Seedcake doesn't have icing: only things that get stuck between your
teeth . . .
R.
___
On 25/10/15 17:45, Kevin Miller wrote:
Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
be fully risen before we add icing.
Aah: super, at last; but "by Gum" it takes a lot of 'heavy-lifting' to
get this sort of definite statement.
Love, Richmond.
P.S. What's the ch
On 25/10/15 16:35, hh wrote:
"RichmondMatth" should read "RichmondMath".
Sorry Richmond, that was a 'Freundian slip' ;-)
___
Ha, Ha: well-said that 'man'.
R.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@l
Someone will be really cheesed off if RunRev has now made a promise of cake
with icing and it is not delivered or delivered without icing.
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Open-Language-and-stability-tp4697974p4697985.html
Sent from the
On 10/25/2015 08:45 AM, Kevin Miller wrote:
Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
be fully risen before we add icing.
Cake!
They told me there would be cake!
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode
Is it cheesecake?
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 11:45 AM, Kevin Miller wrote:
>
> Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
> be fully risen before we add icing.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Ev
Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
be fully risen before we add icing.
Kind regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
On 25/10/2015 13:59, "use-livecode on behalf of Geoff Canyon"
wro
I **am** looking at the output. I love LiveCode, but there is more than one
version current, there are many bugs, there are many deficiencies in the
documentation... What would your advice be to a fairly non-technical person
plunging into the LiveCode pool today for the first time and not wantin
"RichmondMatth" should read "RichmondMath".
Sorry Richmond, that was a 'Freundian slip' ;-)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lis
> Graham Samuel wrote:
> The discussion about Open Language is interesting, and the idea may well be a
> good thing. But I for one would rather hear that for the actual development
> team, delivering a rock-solid version of LiveCode on all supported platforms
> is taking a massive priority over
As someone who *really* wants open language, I completely agree with this.
gc
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 7:06 AM, Graham Samuel wrote:
>
> The discussion about Open Language is interesting, and the idea may well be a
> good thing. But I for one would rather hear that for the actual development
>
The discussion about Open Language is interesting, and the idea may well be a
good thing. But I for one would rather hear that for the actual development
team, delivering a rock-solid version of LiveCode on all supported platforms is
taking a massive priority over even thinking about this stuff.
41 matches
Mail list logo
