On 25/10/15 17:45, Kevin Miller wrote:
Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
be fully risen before we add icing.
Aah: super, at last; but "by Gum" it takes a lot of 'heavy-lifting' to
get this sort of definite statement.
Love, Richmond.
P.S. What's the cherry, then?
Kind regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
On 25/10/2015 13:59, "use-livecode on behalf of Geoff Canyon"
<use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of gcan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
As someone who *really* wants open language, I completely agree with
this.
gc
On Oct 25, 2015, at 7:06 AM, Graham Samuel <livf...@mac.com> wrote:
The discussion about Open Language is interesting, and the idea may
well be a good thing. But I for one would rather hear that for the
actual development team, delivering a rock-solid version of LiveCode on
all supported platforms is taking a massive priority over even thinking
about this stuff. Peter Brett, can you reassure me, as a member of the
use list?
Graham
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
