On 2.03.2016 02:54, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Hi Richmond
RM wrote
[SNIP]
In 1993 I ended up in a married student "cave" at Southern Illinois
University with an LC 475 on the desk in front of me and a screaming 7
month year old next to me (my wife had a Fulbright scholarship);
Hypercard probab
Well, Bob, I wouldn't want to spoil my reputation, would I?
Although tinned duck sounds as though it might stick between the teeth
somewhat.
I do hope that all the wobbly bits in DP15 get ironed out for RC1, even
at the expense
of having to wait until New Year, which would be far better than
On 02/03/2016 00:08, J. Landman Gay wrote:
In the Project Browser, the dotted selections are the objects selected
on the card. You can't alter dotted-line selections from within the PB,
you need to open the property inspector for that.
You can double click on an item in the Project Browser to s
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 23:29, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> Ever since the option was added to take a screen shot directly from an
> object's rendered buffer I've been using that, since I get high-quality
> results and can also work with objects not currently on screen.
>
> Does this not work with w
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 23:11, Ali Lloyd wrote:
>
> I find I get the best results from export snapshot by using the following
> form:
>
> export snapshot from rect (the rect of tObjectLongID) of tObjectLongID ...
>
> So you might try
>
> export snapshot from rect (the rect of widget "Chart") of w
On 01/03/2016 23:58, Robert Mann wrote:
== And lastly, the kafkaesque position vis a vis the use of both tools for
the same code. In practice, can I code part of an application in the
community and part of it in the closed IDE. If not, please do precise if
there are markers somewhere that are us
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 5:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> Two hypotheticals:
>
> 1. I create a viewer app to display my original artwork as part of my
> job-seeking resume. The viewer seems useful so I decide to distribute it to
> others so they can make their own resumes. I include at least som
On 3/1/2016 11:41 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 2 Mar 2016, at 4:35 PM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
Does that sound right to all you guys who read up on this stuff?
I believe any media or other content (whether separate files or not)
distributed with the application and/or required to make it func
On 3/1/2016 8:32 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 03/01/2016 04:08 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:23 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
Don't use the Project Browser so can't comment on the second issue
It's confusing, Ali had to explain it to me. I still mostly use the App
Browser because I need the
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 4:35 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> Does that sound right to all you guys who read up on this stuff?
I believe any media or other content (whether separate files or not)
distributed with the application and/or required to make it function fully
would need to be licensed in
On 3/1/2016 9:53 PM, Robert Mann wrote:
If livecode's wants that all stacks and content made with the Community
version be fully GPL3 compatible,
all media used in a stack must be under a CC BY-SA 4.0 type license, which
is directly compatible with GPLv3.
I have been trying to follow this threa
RE : issue of including copyrighted media into a stack.
<< The creators of the
works retain copyright even as they offer specific rights with regard to
distribution to others.
No distribution license is a transfer of copyright. Not in film, not in
software. >>
So.. did my homework again, he
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 1:41 PM, Robert Mann wrote:
>
> So basically, all clients of any indie developer have to buy/get their own
> license for their product.
No as far as I’m aware clients only need to get their own license if they are
also a developer. If the clients aren’t involved in the appl
Ok, back to LC 7.1.2. The IDE issue is generating a gazillion messages to my
message box and I can’t get anything done in this way. So, hoping this bug gets
fixed for DP16.
Best,
Bill
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 5:07 PM, William Prothero wrote:
>
> Folks:
> I’m getting a long list of lines in the mes
OUps!! that IS DAMN CLEAR! By Jove!!
So ok.. fine.. as one could rephrase the situation :
2) if you do not make it public, than when you're ready, you're free to
a) buy a closed commercial license
and THEN
b) turn for help to an indie/pro developer to finish it up and prepare it
for iOS la
> MonteG wrote:
> Well.. it depends on what he’s apologising for ;-)
LOL!
JimL
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.co
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 1:57 PM, Jim Lambert wrote:
>
>> Whether I buy flowers for my wife because I think she's pretty or because
>> I'm
>> trying to apologize, either way the florist makes $60.
>
> Either way Tiffany is one lucky gal!
Well.. it depends on what he’s apologising for ;-)
> RichardG wrote:
>
> Whether I buy flowers for my wife because I think she's pretty or because I'm
> trying to apologize, either way the florist makes $60.
Either way Tiffany is one lucky gal!
Jim Lambert
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@
Robert Mann wrote:
> RE : issue : does livecode consider that all illustrative material
> & text etc in a stack to their view fall under GPL
I had thought Mark Waddingham had addressed that. When media is related
to the functionality, such as an icon, that would seem reasonable to
expect that
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 1:10 PM, Robert Mann wrote:
>
> 2) if you do not make it public, than when you're ready, you're free to turn
> for help to an indie/pro developer to finish it up and prepare it for iOS
> launch under whatever license suites you.
I refer you to clauses 5 b, d, f and h of the
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 12:58 PM, Robert Mann wrote:
>
> So all coding would be available to all of course. But these copyrighted
> elements will not be GPL compatible because as simple as it is french law
> does not allow an author to push away his copyrights.
Perhaps you are confused between copy
Ok, fine.. that is.. somehow more "logical" !!
So that leads to 2 practical consequences :
1) what seems to be important is the timing of making publicly available
some code :
-- if you "release" some code under GPL for testing out an app
-- and than later on turn to the closed IDE to produce a c
On 03/01/2016 04:08 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:23 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
Don't use the Project Browser so can't comment on the second issue
It's confusing, Ali had to explain it to me. I still mostly use the App
Browser because I need the column layout.
In the Project Browser,
RE : issue : does livecode consider that all illustrative material & text etc
in a stack to their view fall under GPL
<< I suppose if your goal was to write LiveCode scripts and publish them as
a printed volume for your coffee table that might make a very good analogy.
>>
No, in my case I've got
Robert Man wrote:
> == And lastly, the kafkaesque position vis a vis the use of both
> tools for the same code. In practice, can I code part of an
> application in the community and part of it in the closed IDE.
The GPL is a distribution license; it doesn't affect anything you do in
your home o
Matt Maier wrote:
> Unless Livecode modified the GPL it's still a Free software license,
> written and interpreted by the FSF. Calling it Open Source is more
> colloquial, and clearly doesn't cause problems in the vast majority of
> cases. But, in this case, the inaccuracy is causing the confusio
I’ve just reported a similar problem. Bug# 17048 [
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17048 ] Please feel free to add
your comments.
Paul
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 5:07 PM, William Prothero wrote:
>
> Folks:
> I’m getting a long list of lines in the message box when I run my app. I’m
>
Hi Richmond
RM wrote
> [SNIP]
> In 1993 I ended up in a married student "cave" at Southern Illinois
> University with an LC 475 on the desk in front of me and a screaming 7
> month year old next to me (my wife had a Fulbright scholarship);
> Hypercard probably prevented me from battering the ba
Folks:
I’m getting a long list of lines in the message box when I run my app. I’m
creating text boxes in code. Among a lot of the lines, there is:
ERROR: Error when sending message ideNewControl:
Would this be an IDE bug, or mine? My app works as expected, so ??
Bill
Is this something I should
In the standalone settings...
Under the 'Basic Application Settings' there is the 'Profile' popUpMenu
I have noticed that there are profiles in there that are way out of date
Anyone know how I can clean up this menu and just show what is current ?
___
Unless Livecode modified the GPL it's still a Free software license,
written and interpreted by the FSF. Calling it Open Source is more
colloquial, and clearly doesn't cause problems in the vast majority of
cases. But, in this case, the inaccuracy is causing the confusion.
It's worth noting that m
Robert Mann wrote:
> Coming back to Livecode OS I'm really surprised that nobody seem to have
> considered stacks as being not only programs but multimedia interactive
> media, and the related legal stuff like copyright of these sources.
>
> That is the basic in any book publishing see :
>
http
Mark Waddingham covered this in his post:
Whilst the GPL can be used to cover content there are more (GPL compatible)
suitable ones. The main problem with applying the GPL to content is deciding
what constitutes the 'source code'. Indeed, I believe there is an FAQ on the
FSF site about such thi
Matt Maier wrote:
> Robert, as you conduct your research you should also learn about the
> difference between Free Software and Open Source Software. In brief,
> Free Software does special things for moral reasons; it is "right"
> that software be liberated. Open Source Software does special thin
Thanks for your piper mail link. I found your article very informative (and a
breeze to read!).
I'll retain that what's actually written in the GPL license.. is like toilet
paper
What counts is the creators position... Fine.
And that'll close the subject of the status of the stack files for me t
On 3/1/2016 5:23 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
Don't use the Project Browser so can't comment on the second issue
It's confusing, Ali had to explain it to me. I still mostly use the App
Browser because I need the column layout.
In the Project Browser, the dotted selections are the objects selecte
But.. but.. ???
<< With respect to your Question 2, the Indy license doesn't have to
specifically forbid a service where someone with a freer license compiles
code on your behalf. You can't build an actual Livecode application without
using the IDE, so if you used the Community IDE your ap
Robert Mann wrote:
> 1) my personal conclusion reading these is that the assumption you
> make about stack files falling under GPL is.. questionable, but..
> arguable, particularly if there are elements of interfaces buttons
> so on that would link to the engine. And the more intricated these
> b
Tnx Peter: It’s indeed a feature! Thanks.
Best,
Bill
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/03/2016 22:28, William Prothero wrote:
>
>> The first thing I’ve noticed is that selecting objects in the Project
>> Browser and stack window is poor. In 7.1 versions and o
I don't think that's true. The Wordpress plugin author doesn't use Wordpress to
actually type out the code yet it is still covered by the GPL.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 10:26 AM, Matt Maier wrote:
>
> So, I supposed in theory (disclaimer: IANAL)
> if you wrote absolutely everythi
Robert did you read the quote I sent yesterday from the horses mouth? I very
much doubt it would be profitable for anyone to take a different position than
LiveCode Ltd on whether a stackFile is considered a plugin and therefore
covered by the GPL. I have to say that I myself was unsure of this
Thanks Richard.. that one a good example of.. "leonine" clause as we say in
France...
as we say :: El diabolo hides in small details.
Coming back to Livecode OS I'm really surprised that nobody seem to have
considered stacks as being not only programs but multimedia interactive
media, and the re
Ali Lloyd wrote:
> I find I get the best results from export snapshot by using the
> following form:
>
> export snapshot from rect (the rect of tObjectLongID) of
tObjectLongID ...
>
> So you might try
>
> export snapshot from rect (the rect of widget "Chart") of widget
"Chart" of
> this card
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Robert Mann wrote:
> indeed.. I do have an android phone!!
>
> And I read the GNU license for good,
> and the FAQ's for good,
> and some discussions
>
> 1) my personal conclusion reading these is that the assumption you make
> about stack files falling under GPL is
I've also noticed the first issue you mentioned. In my case, it's not so
much that clicking an object doesn't select but trying to grab the handles
to resize an object has to be very accurate or the object is deselected. I
guess I should enter a QCC report.
Don't use the Project Browser so can't
You'd just eat whatever was in it and then complain you still didn't have a tin.
Bob S
On Mar 1, 2016, at 09:57 , RM
mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In our current development process, "Release Candidate" builds are exactly
what they say on the tin, i.e. once we release 8.0 RC 1, t
indeed.. I do have an android phone!!
And I read the GNU license for good,
and the FAQ's for good,
and some discussions
1) my personal conclusion reading these is that the assumption you make
about stack files falling under GPL is.. questionable, but.. arguable,
particularly if there are element
Robert, as you conduct your research you should also learn about the
difference between Free Software and Open Source Software. In brief, Free
Software does special things for moral reasons; it is "right" that software
be liberated. Open Source Software does special things for pragmatic
reasons; it
I find I get the best results from export snapshot by using the following
form:
export snapshot from rect (the rect of tObjectLongID) of tObjectLongID ...
So you might try
export snapshot from rect (the rect of widget "Chart") of widget "Chart" of
this card to tVar as PNG
If that doesn't give y
On 2/03/2016 9:28 am, "use-livecode on behalf of Peter TB Brett"
wrote:
>
>
>On 01/03/2016 22:17, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>> On 25/02/2016 06:28, Terry Judd wrote:
>>> Apologies for hijacking this thread somewhat but Peter could you
>>>possibly
>>> comment on the likelihood of clipboard support bei
Robert Mann wrote:
> Behing the great idea of a Open SOurce, it is surpassing to find
> so much barriers being built around it.
As Peter explained, for most use cases it's not all that deep.
But for edge cases all licenses can be complex, open source and
proprietary alike.
The only reason so
On 01/03/2016 22:28, William Prothero wrote:
The first thing I’ve noticed is that selecting objects in the Project
Browser and stack window is poor. In 7.1 versions and older, when I
clicked on an object on the stack window, it would hilite the
corresponding entry on the project browser. First
Terence Heaford wrote:
On 1 Mar 2016, at 21:57, Terence Heaford wrote:
put the rect widget "Chart" into tRect
subtract 22 from item 2 of tRect
subtract 22 from item 4 of tRect
As a Mac only person I really find it weird to keep having to make adjustments
for the height of a menu.
I drea
Oh! I understand now. That might be a bug, depending on how you look at
it. Card coordinates don't change when there's a menu scrolled out of
view; you'd think that snapshots wouldn't either.
On 3/1/2016 4:24 PM, Tore Nilsen wrote:
I think Terence has a menuBar of his own making in the stack,
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> If memory serves, the LC team has (had?) a service that would build
> for iOS for you as well as help with all the back-end Apple
> certification, etc. Is that still around?
I don't believe so. As I wrote in this thread two days ago:
> What I questionned is that we're
On 01/03/2016 22:17, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On 25/02/2016 06:28, Terry Judd wrote:
Apologies for hijacking this thread somewhat but Peter could you possibly
comment on the likelihood of clipboard support being added to HTML5 in
the
near (or middle) future. I understand there are potential secur
Folks:
I’ve “bit the bullet” and started to work on my app with LC8-DP15. I’m on OSX
El-Capitan.
The first thing I’ve noticed is that selecting objects in the Project Browser
and stack window is poor. In 7.1 versions and older, when I clicked on an
object on the stack window, it would hilite t
On 3/1/2016 3:57 PM, Terence Heaford wrote:
put the rect widget "Chart" into tRect
That may be the problem.
put the rect *OF* widget "chart"...
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_
Hi Robert,
The situation is quite simple:
1) The Open Source edition of LiveCode is licensed under the GNU General
Public License, version 3. This says that if you distribute works
derived from the Open Source edition of LiveCode (which we interpret to
include stack files), then you must do
I think Terence has a menuBar of his own making in the stack, that would count
for the extra 22 pixels on the card being pushed upward on the mac version, but
still a part of the card height.
Tore
> 1. mar. 2016 kl. 23.22 skrev J. Landman Gay :
>
> On 3/1/2016 3:57 PM, Terence Heaford wrote:
On 3/1/2016 3:57 PM, Terence Heaford wrote:
On 1 Mar 2016, at 21:32, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
"To export a snapshot for a portion of a stack you use the form:
export snapshot from rect[angle] of window windowID to ... Where
windowId is the windowId property of the required stack."
This does no
On 25/02/2016 06:28, Terry Judd wrote:
Apologies for hijacking this thread somewhat but Peter could you possibly
comment on the likelihood of clipboard support being added to HTML5 in the
near (or middle) future. I understand there are potential security
concerns around use of the clipboard but i
The price rise in the commercial license has led me to try understand the
Opens SOurce License, although I had always in my mind to keep with a
commercial license ideally.
And that leads to big surprises. I'll be doing a little bit of homework on
that.
*Question 1 :: is there somewhere a kind of
On 25/02/2016 19:23, Matt Maier wrote:
That was too abstract and hypothetical for me to be sure I followed
correctly.
In the approach the Livecode team is taking now, is it accurate to say that
the html5 standalone bundles up the livecode engine with any app-specific
objects/scripts and pushes t
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 21:57, Terence Heaford wrote:
>
> put the rect widget "Chart" into tRect
>
> subtract 22 from item 2 of tRect
>
> subtract 22 from item 4 of tRect
As a Mac only person I really find it weird to keep having to make adjustments
for the height of a menu.
All the best
Terr
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 21:31, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2016 21:15, Terence Heaford wrote:
>> Is it the intention to add printing functionality to this widget?
>
> Yes, but the core dev team probably won't have time to work on it before the
> LiveCode 8.0 release.
>
>
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 21:32, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> "To export a snapshot for a portion of a stack you use the form:
> export snapshot from rect[angle] of window windowID to ...
> Where windowId is the windowId property of the required stack."
This does not work correctly on a Mac for the reas
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
>
>> I'll give it a go. While I could just wrap the whole thing up and
>> execute it as a script, I’m really trying to do as much as possible
>> in LCB to learn.
>
> Yes. I quite like programming in LCB because the compiler helps catch (so
On 3/1/2016 1:41 PM, Terence Heaford wrote:
I have been unable to get the Browser widget to print as I
suspect there is no option for this so I thought I would try a snapshot using
this:
export snapshot from rect (the rect of widget "Chart") of this card to tVar as
PNG
put tVar into image "my
On 01/03/2016 21:15, Terence Heaford wrote:
Is it the intention to add printing functionality to this widget?
Yes, but the core dev team probably won't have time to work on it before
the LiveCode 8.0 release.
Peter
--
Dr Peter Brett
LiveCode Open Source T
On 01/03/2016 21:14, Stephen MacLean wrote:
Thanks:) Being strongly typed has it’s plusses and minuses. I was
hoping to avoid “parsed as number” by using the “any” type.
It looks like that when you have a variable in LCB with a type of
“any” and perform an action on it, it becomes that type. So
Another option similar to Randy's is to create an image tile -- for
example, a 48x48 white PNG that's 50% opaque -- and assign this as the
backPattern of the button. Using this method you can scale the button to
any size and the translucency will fill accordingly. You can also assign
a separate i
On 3/1/2016 1:25 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
We looking at very simple button design:
1) Border color is on/white/2px
2) background is set to clear (no color assignment and no icon)
3) background opacity set to 50% # if we can figure out how
4) Button name/label white
...
The
Is it the intention to add printing functionality to this widget?
Thanks
Terry
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.c
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2016 20:44, Stephen MacLean wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I’m looking for some help on complex statements in LCB.
>>
>> I’m trying to take a script statement like this:
>>
>> if (char x of tCardNum)*2 > 9 then
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Do
On 3/1/2016 2:09 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 1 Mar 2016, at 5:05 PM, Alejandro Tejada
wrote:
Why not publish your Apps for iOS using a Publisher Partner?
Maybe an iOS Publisher Partner selected among our very own LiveCode
fellow developers.
We discussed this during the original Kickstarte
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 20:33, Tore Nilsen wrote:
>
> It may not be the most elegant solution, but this works for me:
>
> on mouseUp
>
> put the rect widget "Chart" into tRect
>
> add left of this stack to item 1 of tRect
>
> add left of this stack to item 3 of tRect
>
> add top of this stack t
On 01/03/2016 20:44, Stephen MacLean wrote:
Hi All,
I’m looking for some help on complex statements in LCB.
I’m trying to take a script statement like this:
if (char x of tCardNum)*2 > 9 then
Hi Stephen,
Don't forget that LCB is strongly typed. That means that a string isn't
a number, so
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 7:38 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> That "someone" would be violating the terms and conditions of their Indy (or
> Business) license.
>
> If they were *lucky*, they would promptly find that they didn't have their
> license any more.
>
> Needless to say, anyone trying such
Hi All,
I’m looking for some help on complex statements in LCB.
I’m trying to take a script statement like this:
if (char x of tCardNum)*2 > 9 then
into the equivalent statement in LCB.
While it will compile fine, calling the function that contains the code above
with give the dreaded error
This doesn’t capture my part in this conversation. Personally, I am unconcerned
about protecting my code/projects and I’m very happy to publish using the GPL
license. But . . . BIG BUT . . . Apple won’t accept GPL, and I cannot afford
the ever increasing price of the commercial license as a hobb
On 01/03/2016 20:18, RM wrote:
If by a "Publisher Partner" you mean getting someone who owns a licence
to the Commercial version
of Livecode to build you stacks from your standalones, that (while
possibly not being illegal) seems
sneaky and under-hand.
I suppose someone will try this trick soon
By adjusting some colour values and the ink mode I could achieve what I think
you are looking for, however I may have misunderstood, because I don’t quite
understand the bit about having 50% opacity of a clear background!
Link to demo stack with my interpretation:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xhjq
It may not be the most elegant solution, but this works for me:
on mouseUp
put the rect widget "Chart" into tRect
add left of this stack to item 1 of tRect
add left of this stack to item 3 of tRect
add top of this stack to item 2 of tRect
add top of this stack to item 4 of tRect
export snaps
It sounds to me that you want the color of the button to be 50% … meaning that
the card (or whatever) below it will show though. And, you want the border and
name of button to be opaque… if all that is correct, you might want to give
this a try.
create an image in the color you want the button
On 1.03.2016 22:09, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 1 Mar 2016, at 5:05 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Why not publish your Apps for iOS
using a Publisher Partner?
Maybe an iOS Publisher Partner
selected among our very own
LiveCode fellow developers.
We discussed this during the original Kickstarter
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 5:05 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
>
> Why not publish your Apps for iOS
> using a Publisher Partner?
>
> Maybe an iOS Publisher Partner
> selected among our very own
> LiveCode fellow developers.
We discussed this during the original Kickstarter and I believe the discussio
You must take the distance from the left egde of the screen and from the top of
the screen into consideration when you try to export a snapshot of a browser
instance. The browsers position is measured from the topLeft of the screen, not
the card I think.
Tore
> 1. mar. 2016 kl. 20.41 skrev Tere
On 3/1/2016 12:50 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2016-03-01 19:45, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:44, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2016-03-01 19:20, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:15, stephen barncard wrote:
you guys are too intellectual for me...{ducking}
So, if you aren't going to let me have a tin, wh
I have been unable to get the Browser widget to print as I
suspect there is no option for this so I thought I would try a snapshot using
this:
export snapshot from rect (the rect of widget "Chart") of this card to tVar as
PNG
put tVar into image "myImage"
Unfortunately it does not capture the
Here's a demo of what I just wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/63u8h6sb0gk2yjo/Button%20Games.livecode.zip?dl=0
Richmond.
On 1.03.2016 21:25, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
We looking at very simple button design:
1) Border color is on/white/2px
2) background is set to clear (no color ass
On 1.03.2016 21:30, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 21:25, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
We looking at very simple button design:
1) Border color is on/white/2px
2) background is set to clear (no color assignment and no icon)
3) background opacity set to 50% # if we can figure out how
4)
On 1.03.2016 21:25, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
We looking at very simple button design:
1) Border color is on/white/2px
2) background is set to clear (no color assignment and no icon)
3) background opacity set to 50% # if we can figure out how
4) Button name/label white
Now...
We looking at very simple button design:
1) Border color is on/white/2px
2) background is set to clear (no color assignment and no icon)
3) background opacity set to 50% # if we can figure out how
4) Button name/label white
Now... I realize that if # 2 above is true, then possibly, since
On 1.03.2016 21:11, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
I may have asked this before, but am I the only one who wishes we could set the
opacity of the background of a button to discrete levels without having to
change the blend level of the whole button?
Yes, I realize that we can create a gra
I may have asked this before, but am I the only one who wishes we could set the
opacity of the background of a button to discrete levels without having to
change the blend level of the whole button?
Yes, I realize that we can create a graphic object behind the button and set
that, then make the
Glen,
I don't think that Automator makes shell scripts. However, it is
possible to create an app, which can be started from LiveCode. We do
this every day, when we make invoices for buyers of my book.
Kind regards,
Mark Schonewille
http://economy-x-talk.com
https://www.facebook.com/marksch
On 1.03.2016 20:45, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:44, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2016-03-01 19:20, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:15, stephen barncard wrote:
you guys are too intellectual for me...{ducking}
So, if you aren't going to let me have a tin, where's the duck?
You'll be asking for a du
On 1.03.2016 20:44, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2016-03-01 19:20, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:15, stephen barncard wrote:
you guys are too intellectual for me...{ducking}
So, if you aren't going to let me have a tin, where's the duck?
You'll be asking for a duck in a tin next! ;)
Mark.
No
On 2016-03-01 19:45, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:44, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2016-03-01 19:20, RM wrote:
On 1.03.2016 20:15, stephen barncard wrote:
you guys are too intellectual for me...{ducking}
So, if you aren't going to let me have a tin, where's the duck?
You'll be asking for a duck
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
