If FM and your stack is on the same computer you can exchange data by ODBC.
Marek
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.
On 08/08/2013, at 3:11 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> Yeah, I effectively like that too.
One of the nice things about it is it's quite easy to implement. For those that
haven't had a look at the source the function to get an object property has a
boolean 'effective' parameter. So if true you woul
On 8/8/13 12:13 AM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 08/08/2013, at 2:55 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I'm trying to think when a script object would not be "me" if it
wasn't a behavior.
right, that's what I was saying was nice about scriptObject.. but I'm
sold on 'the effective behavior of me' now
Ye
On 08/08/2013, at 2:55 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> I'm trying to think when a script object would not be "me" if it wasn't a
> behavior.
right, that's what I was saying was nice about scriptObject.. but I'm sold on
'the effective behavior of me' now
--
M E R Goulding
Software development ser
On 08/08/2013, at 1:33 PM, Jim Lambert wrote:
> How about the effective me?
I think it might be difficult to implement because me is not a property but it
did make me think of somethign that would be easy to implement and quite
reasonable syntax I think:
the effective behavior of me
Where th
On 8/7/13 11:33 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jim-
Wednesday, August 7, 2013, 8:33:26 PM, you wrote:
How about the effective me?
After my initial shock, I'm thinking that this is kind of not too bad.
It's a weird use of "effective", but you could see if you're in the
context of a behavior object by
Here are my suggestions:
- self
- myself
- this object
The nerd inside wanted to suggest 'ego' and 'id' but that would have been over
the top ;-)
Jan Schenkel.
=
Quartam Reports & PDF Library for LiveCode
www.quartam.com
=
"As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at t
On 8/7/13 11:46 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 08/08/2013, at 2:12 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
And now that I've had 8 more minutes to think about it, how about
"behaviorObject". That's even more descriptive.
True but one of the nice things about scriptObject is that it works
outside the behavio
On 08/08/2013, at 2:12 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> And now that I've had 8 more minutes to think about it, how about
> "behaviorObject". That's even more descriptive.
True but one of the nice things about scriptObject is that it works outside the
behavior context. I did raise the issue on the
Jim-
Wednesday, August 7, 2013, 8:33:26 PM, you wrote:
> How about the effective me?
After my initial shock, I'm thinking that this is kind of not too bad.
It's a weird use of "effective", but you could see if you're in the
context of a behavior object by checking
if me is not the effective me
On 8/7/13 11:03 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 8/7/13 9:39 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
I think 'the object containing this script' spells it out most
clearly... using the owner my introduce confusion with the object
hierarchy owner. But I don't think it's possible to do and nobody
wants to write th
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> > Don't know how many rows are involved but it would be much faster to
> select
> > all the rows from the memory db table with one SELECT, then build the
> > UPDATE statements using an L
On 8/7/13 10:06 PM, Mike Kerner wrote:
If we go this way, could I pretty please get my name in the source code
this one time? If not, can we please, please, please either count empty
last items or change the database functions so empty last items aren't such
a PITA?
I hope they put your name
On 8/7/13 9:39 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
I think 'the object containing this script' spells it out most
clearly... using the owner my introduce confusion with the object
hierarchy owner. But I don't think it's possible to do and nobody
wants to write the objectContainingThisScript... Mark Waddin
How about the effective me?
The dictionary defines 'effective' as
"Used with inherited properties to specify the object's own setting or the
setting inherited from the object's owner, whichever is actually displayed."
Setting an object's behavior lets the object inherit the script from another
If this new feature is not going to be used very often, then "the object
containing this script" is probably better than any of my ideas so far, but
I think we can still do better for some reason. I want the phrase to be
clear to the beginner, because if it's clear to the beginner, I think it
will
On 08/08/2013, at 11:52 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> I vote for "the owner of this script" or "the scriptObject". Or alternately,
> "the owner of this behavior".
I think 'the object containing this script' spells it out most clearly... using
the owner my introduce confusion with the object hier
On 08/08/2013, at 11:28 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
> I'm not sure why "me" in "B" SHOULD output "A". If I was reading that code
> (with "me" instead of "this me"), I would say it would/should always say
> "B", not "A", and that we have the whole meaning of "me" messed up. I
> understand why things
On 8/7/13 8:28 PM, Mike Kerner wrote:
HOWEVER, if I'm stuck with this behavior as described (UGH), then
"the owner of this script"
"the object this script belongs to"
"the object containing this script"
"the scriptContainer"
"the scriptObject"
I vote for "the owner of this script" or "the scr
this is obviously a tough one because we have an extra level of abstraction
to deal with, which also means, IMHO, that we are going to have more typing
to do if we want the words to mean anything.
Trying to use at least some of the vocabulary from the release notes, where
"B" contains the script a
Sorry, Mark W, I didn't understand what you were asking.
I don't think I got a notice. I think it popped up in LC when I was
launching it.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Monte Goulding
wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2013, at 8:45 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
>
> > Then why did you accept "this me"?
>
> I
On 08/08/2013, at 8:45 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
> Then why did you accept "this me"?
It's not up to me to accept it or not so I'm not sure where you got that from.
>
> In the discussion I am having with you now, you said "this behavior" doesn't
> make sense.
Yes, it doesn't make sense outs
No problem. I forgot that as a lifetime license contributor to the
kickstarter campaign that I also got licenses to SQL Yoga, MobGui and AE.
Got my license keys today. LOL.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:39 PM, James Hale wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The seat has gone. Thank you.
>
> James
>
>
Then why did you accept "this me"?
In the discussion I am having with you now, you said "this behavior"
doesn't make sense.
Now I'm really putting an end to this discussion. It doesn't seem to
lead anywhere, but I do hope others will contribute with some really
good ideas.
--
Best regards,
On 08/08/2013, at 8:24 AM, Mark Schonewille
wrote:
> Oh I see. You suggest people should come up with something better but you
> don't care that the syntax is super ugly now. Thanks for clearing that up.
> I'll just leave you to it then.
It's not my feature so why are you leaving it to me? I
On 8/7/13 3:54 PM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
Ray,
Creating an ipa file is actually quite easy. It's just a zip archive (more or
less) of your app bundle. There is a slight trick. Follow these steps:
In the Finder, create a folder named Payload (the uppercase P is important).
Copy your app bundle
Oh I see. You suggest people should come up with something better but
you don't care that the syntax is super ugly now. Thanks for clearing
that up. I'll just leave you to it then.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-
On 08/08/2013, at 7:54 AM, Mark Schonewille
wrote:
> First of all, if it is properly documented, people will understand that "this
> control" is a bit of an exception.
Sure, proper documentation can help. I personally don't like that this control
could mean something other than me because it
On 8/7/13 4:14 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Mike-
Wednesday, August 7, 2013, 2:02:50 PM, you wrote:
Mark W.: Go to the Help menu in 6.1.1 (rc2), scroll down to Release Notes.
Thanks. I know how to get Release Notes.
Are you saying you got a release notice that rc2 was available?
I didn't get a
Monte,
First of all, if it is properly documented, people will understand that
"this control" is a bit of an exception.
Second, if you ask for ideas, you should not immediately reject
everything I write, because you're scaring potential contributors to the
discussion.
--
Best regards,
Mar
On Aug 7, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Mike-
>
> Wednesday, August 7, 2013, 2:02:50 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Mark W.: Go to the Help menu in 6.1.1 (rc2), scroll down to Release Notes.
>
> Thanks. I know how to get Release Notes.
> Are you saying you got a release notice that rc2 was avai
On 08/08/2013, at 7:41 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
> Wow, I'm striking out today. Sorry. I forget that I already have a mergExt
> subscription and it's included in that. :-)
It's the bargain of the century ;-)
--
Monte Goulding
M E R Goulding - software development services
mergExt - There's
Wow, I'm striking out today. Sorry. I forget that I already have a mergExt
subscription and it's included in that. :-)
On Aug 7, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2013, at 7:20 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
>
>> Yes, if you're using TestFlight. Head to mergext.com, hit the Do
On 08/08/2013, at 7:08 AM, Mark Schonewille
wrote:
> Why do you want "this me" to have sense outside a behavior script, if the
> only place where it will be used is in a behavior script?
I'm not really sure but that's the main reason I can think of for 'this
behavior' being rejected ;-)
>
>
Just bought it. Thanks for the link!
On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2013, at 7:20 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
>
>> Yes, if you're using TestFlight. Head to mergext.com, hit the Download link
>> (you may have to create a free account first; I can't remember) and
On 08/08/2013, at 7:20 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
> Yes, if you're using TestFlight. Head to mergext.com, hit the Download link
> (you may have to create a free account first; I can't remember) and then
> locate the link for mergTestApp. It's a free plugin. Very useful, especially
> for testi
Yes, if you're using TestFlight. Head to mergext.com, hit the Download link
(you may have to create a free account first; I can't remember) and then locate
the link for mergTestApp. It's a free plugin. Very useful, especially for
testing app builds on a local device. One click will build your ap
Mike-
Wednesday, August 7, 2013, 2:02:50 PM, you wrote:
> Mark W.: Go to the Help menu in 6.1.1 (rc2), scroll down to Release Notes.
Thanks. I know how to get Release Notes.
Are you saying you got a release notice that rc2 was available?
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
_
Chris,
When I read through these steps I though "you're kidding me!" but they seem to
have worked. The jury's actually still out till I hear back from my tester or
try it myself. Anyway, many thanks!
Does Monte have an app or something which facilitates this? I'm unable to find
it searching
Monte,
Why do you want "this me" to have sense outside a behavior script, if
the only place where it will be used is in a behavior script?
Apparently, "this group", "this control" etc. is not a synonym of "me"
because currently "this group", "this control" etc. throws an execution
error whil
Paul: Don't forget "add 1 to x". Yes, an assignment operator would be
great, but that is a battle that goes back 25 years, along with several
other things that really ought to change. When something new comes along
but is not yet engrained in the culture, it's a lot easier to fix it.
Mark W.:
Ah, yes. How could I forget? Sorry Monte. :-)
On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2013, at 6:54 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
>
>> There are probably utilities around that can help you do this
>
> Cough... mergTestFlight... cough
>
> --
> Monte Goulding
>
> M E
On 08/08/2013, at 6:54 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
> There are probably utilities around that can help you do this
Cough... mergTestFlight... cough
--
Monte Goulding
M E R Goulding - software development services
mergExt - There's an external for that!
On 08/08/2013, at 6:44 AM, Mark Schonewille
wrote:
> Behaviors used to be called parentScripts. An option could be "this parent".
Yes it could but it suffers the same problem of this behavior where it doesn't
make sense outside a behavior script.
>
> Also, currently syntax of the form "this
Ray,
Creating an ipa file is actually quite easy. It's just a zip archive (more or
less) of your app bundle. There is a slight trick. Follow these steps:
In the Finder, create a folder named Payload (the uppercase P is important).
Copy your app bundle into that folder.
Compress the Payload folde
Mike-
Wednesday, August 7, 2013, 11:34:58 AM, you wrote:
> 6.1.1-rc2 ?
Was there a release notice about this?
I didn't get one if so.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please vi
> From: Mike Kerner
>
> Really? That was the best we could come up with? That. Is.
> Horrible. And. Must. Die.
>
> In what context in the English language would that even begin
> to make sense?
Typical English. Ever wonder about phrases like "There, there" or "My, oh
my", or "hail fellow
Hi,
Behaviors used to be called parentScripts. An option could be "this parent".
Also, currently syntax of the form "this control", "this button", "this
group" etc throws an execution error. It would be very nice if this
syntax would be used instead of "this me" and it would make sense.
--
B
I would love to, and I would hope that this...thing...would be sent back
where it came from.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Monte Goulding
wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2013, at 4:13 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
>
> > Really? That was the best we could come up with? That. Is. Horrible.
> > And. Must. Di
Are there simple steps to do this anywhere?
I believe I've added my tester's UDID. I just need to get him the app
(standalone). TestFlight asks me to create an "IPA". I usually drink those
:-) Not sure what that means in the world of software but I'm unable create
one by "archiving" my app
On 08/08/2013, at 4:13 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
> Really? That was the best we could come up with? That. Is. Horrible.
> And. Must. Die.
>
> In what context in the English language would that even begin to make sense?
I've suggested it makes sense if you have multiple-personality disorder
Help->Release notes Page 7, at the top.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Mark Schonewille <
m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I haven't seen that yet. Where can I download the Release Notes or can you
> post the exactl syntax?
>
> I must admit that it would seem weird if "this
Mike,
I haven't seen that yet. Where can I download the Release Notes or can you post
the exactl syntax?
I must admit that it would seem weird if "this me" were valid syntax.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.c
And for the record, we're still talking about "this me", not the fact that
if the last item in a container or sub-container is empty, it is treated as
if it isn't there, which is an unbelievable PITA when dealing with the
results from database queries.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Mike Kerner
I wasn't looking at a thread. I was looking at Page 7, release notes for
6.1.1-rc2
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Mark Schonewille <
m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Reading the thread on the forum, to which you really should have linked
> yourself, I get the impression tha
Mike,
Reading the thread on the forum, to which you really should have linked
yourself, I get the impression that it is a joke. I really can't figure
out whether you're serious or not.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://econ
Some context to put that into perspective:
http://forums.runrev.com/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=14843&start=90#p82087
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsu
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> Don't know how many rows are involved but it would be much faster to select
> all the rows from the memory db table with one SELECT, then build the
> UPDATE statements using an LC script. An wrap the whole thing in BEGIN/END.
There are thre
Really? That was the best we could come up with? That. Is. Horrible.
And. Must. Die.
In what context in the English language would that even begin to make sense?
There are some bad ideas in LC, but that one is downright pathetic - right
along with blank last items being treated like they do
I convert "most" of the images in my stacks that need the full range of
transparency via tinypng.org. I have a utility on my PC that does the same
thing but tinypng has been far more convenient. The downsides are the
resulting files aren't compatible with early web browsers, my version of
Photosho
Don't know how many rows are involved but it would be much faster to select
all the rows from the memory db table with one SELECT, then build the
UPDATE statements using an LC script. An wrap the whole thing in BEGIN/END.
As for the NULL issue, you could do two selects, one for rows where the
col
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 00:20:59 -0500
> From: Geoff Canyon
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Subject: Re: With Apple script no longer supported, how do I
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Would it work to export from within FileMaker, and t
With an SQLite database in memory, and a "real" database either on
machine or remote, I need to sync the two.
I'm trying to find a clever & fast way to create a SELECT query that
produces the corresponding UPDATE query.
I can do something like "SELECT " & 'UPDATE sometable SET col1=''" &
col1 & "
Sorted...:-) Thanks Mark
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:32:14 +0100
> From: m_p_wil...@yahoo.co.uk
> Subject: Re: linking for armv7 failed...
> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>
> Are you using any externals that might not have been built for armv7?
>
>
>
> From:
Mark,
thank you very much for your message and for your deep analysis.
It was really helpfull.
I agree with you that at the moment the best solution to deploy a
mobile app seems to be to integrate LiveCode with the mApp framework
provided by Monte.
Then, Monte's video about mApp at the RunrevLIv
Are you using any externals that might not have been built for armv7?
From: John Dixon
To: "use-livecode@lists.runrev.com"
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013, 9:48
Subject: linking for armv7 failed...
I am in the middle of trying to upload an ipad app to itunes
>> Then I wonder how to deal with the MIT licence if I have to deploy a
>>commercial app.
The MIT license tells you - you have to provide a copy of the copyright notice
and permission statement (essentially a copy of the license file) with all
copies of the software, although I'm sure Monte isn
I am in the middle of trying to upload an ipad app to itunes...
To cover what I have showing in the livecode prefrences under 'mobile support'
I have xcode 4.4.1, 4.52, 4.6, 4.6.2, 4.6.3
Available SDK's 5.1, 6.0, 6.1
Available simulators 5.1, 6.0, 6.1
I have my app identifier, development provis
Thank you all for your messages.
I had a look at the mApp framework. I do not understand exactly how it
works and AFAIK there is not any documentation about this software yet (I
can listen to Monte's presentation at the last RunRev meeting though).Then
I wonder how to deal with the MIT licence
Thanks Monte and Neil,
changing the identifizier fixed this. Can't see the tree from the forrest
sometimes.
:-)
Best,
Malte
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your s
Dear Malte,
You could also try resetting the iOS simulator to its default state via
the "reset content an Settings" option from the iOS Simulators
application bar.
iOS simulator>Reset Content and Settings
Please note that this will clear currently installed iOS applications
from the sim
71 matches
Mail list logo
