Jeff-
HTTP PUT is an interesting alternative, but I see two possible
complications. First of all you'd have to query the Allow headers on
the server to see if the PUT command is supported, and then come up
with an alternate strategy if it isn't. Secondly, you'd have to deal
with the 301 response i
On 08/07/2011 09:49 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 8/7/11 10:05 PM, Jeffrey Massung wrote:
So, the only way you can begin to solve this issue is if you have direct
access to the web server and know how it's routing and serving static
content.
I'll answer you and Mark Weider at the same time. I'
Odd results, in your case. I have had no problem creating and saving a stack
with LIvecode Server 4.6.3, as well as saving and load multidimensional
custom properties. Creating cards is no problems as well.
here's my create stack code, be it simple as it is, that worked for me on
LIvecode Server 4
Jacque-
Sunday, August 7, 2011, 8:49:52 PM, you wrote:
> It sounds like I may have to ask the user to provide both paths. But
> that makes everything more complex because the two paths are slightly
> different, the user needs to know the distinction between web-relative
> paths and absolute paths
--- On Sun, 8/7/11, J. Landman Gay wrote:
From: J. Landman Gay
Subject: Re: Converting HTTP to FTP URL
To: "How to use LiveCode"
Date: Sunday, August 7, 2011, 8:49 PM
On 8/7/11 10:05 PM, Jeffrey Massung wrote:
> So, the only way you can begin to solve this issue is if you have direct
> acce
It was released in to the public domain (full source) so you really
shouldn't have to pay anything for it.. No idea about the wrapper
though so you may incur a charge there..
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit t
On 8/7/11 10:05 PM, Jeffrey Massung wrote:
So, the only way you can begin to solve this issue is if you have direct
access to the web server and know how it's routing and serving static
content.
I'll answer you and Mark Weider at the same time. I'm trying to add
auto-upload to AirLaunch. It m
I happen to need this now. I looked on the run rev store but do not see it for
sale. I browsed for it but could not find sean's site. If anyone has a buy link
it would be appreciated. The wrapper will be nice too.
Bob
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 6, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Char
On 08/07/2011 04:12 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I need a way to convert a web URL to a valid FTP URL. For example,
convert this:
http://www.domain.com/folder/file.txt
to this:
ftp://user:p...@domain.com/webroot/folder/file.txt
Not all servers use "public_html" so I can't just hard-code tha
Jacque-
How "generic" a solution are you looking for? Obviously you're not
looking for the trivial "file.txt" because if you could get it from
http why would you need ftp... Just because a site has a web server
there's no guarantee that there's also an ftp server.
So I gather that you know the us
I find it interesting that we've identified that a couple of things that
made HyperCard great was that it was initially free with every Mac and it
came with loads of free examples.
I'm not sure that it was targeted towards inventive users, but just a
continuation of the philosophy that as computer
Why create and save stacks? To use stacks in publishing process :: "one to
many", where one author or a reduced number of persons update some
hierchical and finally structured datas. That's what I hope I can now do
with these stacks long awaited!
Relationnal database is of course much needed in a
On 8/7/11 5:12 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I need a way to convert a web URL to a valid FTP URL. For example,
convert this:
http://www.domain.com/folder/file.txt
to this:
ftp://user:p...@domain.com/webroot/folder/file.txt
Not all servers use "public_html" so I can't just hard-code that as the
w
I need a way to convert a web URL to a valid FTP URL. For example,
convert this:
http://www.domain.com/folder/file.txt
to this:
ftp://user:p...@domain.com/webroot/folder/file.txt
Not all servers use "public_html" so I can't just hard-code that as the
web root. Is there a generic way to i
Alejandro-
It's not nearly that simple. Here's an example:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/oracle-javas-worst-enemy-168828
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
I would love to use stacks instead of files. Millions of sites work just fine
saving stuff into files, despite them not being multi user save or anything
weird like that.
More importantly, stacks should work like stacks everywhere, and not partially
on mobile, partially (but different) as revl
But, Is really necessary to embrace open source
to use Livecode as scripting language in Open
Office?
Notice that iPad, iPhone and iPod uses C#
and Android uses Java...
When you create applications for these platforms,
LiveCode apps does not get compiled as C# and
Java executables?
This means th
Hi All... (sending this in two parts, I tried to send it before but never saw
it show up on list...length maybe?)
First Part:
I'm still having problems with a irev mysql file. I'm attempting to create a
new record in a table. The new record gets created by I still seem to get
errors reported b
Al,
While certainly LC would be wonderful as a scripting language for Open
Office, there are significant business issues which come to mind preventing
such use. The most obvious being LC is not Open Source.
IMO, Open Office is not enough of a "draw" to warrant LC swallowing the open
source pill.
Hi,
I guess I was just wondering how the new feature of being able to use stacks
could be useful in designing web applications. I was not really thinking of
multi user sites but something where one user is updating a blog or static
content or something like that.
As I was thinking about this
Why create stacks when LiveCode Server can manage data via text files or
databases - the orthodox data storage options for multi-user server
environments, which come complete with robust security models?
If the data is structured and suits a database approach, the inherent data
storage aspects
I couldn't help but wonder why you wanted to save stacks from LiveCode Server.
The important part of this support is the ability to share business logic
between desktop, mobile and server applications.
Storing data is an enticing idea, but flawed: stacks are not a multi-user data
storage infrast
I have added an enhancement request to the QCC to have 'save stack'
implemented on LiveCode Server, Report #9664
Is there another way to save a stack that I am missing?
Is there a reason why allowing LiveCode server to save stacks would not be a
good idea?
I see it could be a way to store data w
23 matches
Mail list logo
