Al, While certainly LC would be wonderful as a scripting language for Open Office, there are significant business issues which come to mind preventing such use. The most obvious being LC is not Open Source.
IMO, Open Office is not enough of a "draw" to warrant LC swallowing the open source pill. On Saturday, August 6, 2011, Alejandro Tejada <capellan2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chipp, > > I agree with your commentary about the differences > between Now and Then. > > Everyone agrees that this platform needs more > exposure and in a previous message, I asked about > the possibility of creating some plug-in to use > LiveCode as an alternate scripting language > in Open Office: > > http://framework.openoffice.org/scripting/release-0.2/index.html > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Scripting/How_the_Scripting_Framework_Works > > The advantages of using LiveCode are > notable, while working with text, words, > lines... > > What do you think of this idea? > > Al > > -- > View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Where-does-survive-the-inventive-user-tp3698117p3724370.html > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- Chipp Walters CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
