[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1486525] [NEW] fglrx-core 2:15.200-0ubuntu4: fglrx-core kernel module failed to build

2015-08-19 Thread Tomás Manzano Galán
Public bug reported: Update of the package fglrx failed ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: fglrx-core 2:15.200-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-25.26-generic 3.19.8-ckt2 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx .tmp.unity.support.test.0:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 900308] Re: Unity crashes after being suspended for >48hrs

2012-01-17 Thread Tomás Cohen Arazi
It happens really often to me, and I see: compiz[2686]: segfault at 10 ip 7f1d60b08a23 sp 7fff50cfa560 error 4 in libgdk-3.so.0.200.0[7f1d60acb000+77000] in kern.log Jan 17 19:55:58 luna gnome-session[2603]: Gdk-WARNING: The program 'gnome-session' received an X Window System error.#01

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 528214] Re: Touchpad does not work after recent update

2010-11-05 Thread Tomás
Hi Gursimran, Thanks so much for the reply. It ultimately turned out that the bug was a hardware issue! I really appreciate all your work for the ubuntu project in general. Thanks a lot, Tomás 2010/11/4 Gursimran singh Mohar > Hi Thomas > Thank you for taking the time to report this b

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 528214] Re: Touchpad does not work after recent update

2010-02-25 Thread Tomás
** Attachment added: "lshal" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39806201/lshal -- Touchpad does not work after recent update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-input-synaptics in ubuntu

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 528214] [NEW] Touchpad does not work after recent update

2010-02-25 Thread Tomás
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics bios-version:V1.03 system-manufacturer:eMachines system-product-name:eMachines D620 system-version:0100 Linux tomas-laptop 2.6.31-19-generic #56-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 28 01:26:53 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-gene

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2010-02-25 Thread José Tomás Atria
Please someone confirm Morten's info. 3d Support for ++hd3xxx in the kernel? no fglrx? that's too good to be true. and too big to be unnoticed until now? On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:54 PM, svaens wrote: > @Morten Frisch > > Can it be true! A real fix in time for lucid! That will make me very > hap

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-11-25 Thread José Tomás Atria
@flaim, thanks for the tip, but it seems that this is the same fix we've been discussing for months in this bug, that has been now supplemented with a more elegant version by felix kuelig, and that has serious memory leak problems. On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:57 AM, fllaim wrote: > I've found a fi

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-11-14 Thread José Tomás Atria
s you were refering to? On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Vancouverite wrote: > @ Prabhakar Nagral, did this work for you? > > @ José Tomás Atria > > I can confirm that switching off fglrx power saving takes care of the > problem for me.  Further I have found that it only affects me i

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-11-13 Thread José Tomás Atria
do we have confirmation for this? ie, is the memory leak associated to fglrx power saving? On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Prabhakar Nagral wrote: > thanks much..found it! > > Regards, > -P > > --- On Fri, 13/11/09, Vancouverite wrote: > > From: Vancouverite > Subject: [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-11-10 Thread José Tomás Atria
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM, svaens wrote: > So, it should be possible to achieve fast (normal) unminimizing AND no > memory leak. And that is what vancouverite has achieved? As long as you don't use fglrx and stick to 2d acceleration only, it appears so, yes. But then again, the origin of t

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-11-10 Thread José Tomás Atria
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:44 PM, svaens wrote: > So what did you do differently to now have no memory leak? > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Vancouverite wrote: >> >> I have now reverted to radeon and the current x-server-core that ships >> with Karmic (2:1.6.4-2ubuntu4) and have had no increa

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-10-27 Thread José Tomás Atria
I agree that felix's patch is superior (apparently the empty buffer's load faster than the ones containing random memory contents, besides the already discussed security and aestethics aspects), but at least for me, i'm experiencing memory leaks with both alternatives. Incidentally, i seem to obse

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-10-26 Thread José Tomás Atria
in my experience, Felxi Kuehling's patch has performed better on this machine. It looks prettier too :) On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Malaria wrote: > Which one is the better patch ? > > However, it would be great if those ppa can be maintain up to date (sync > with the legacy xorg package). >

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-10-16 Thread José Tomás Atria
rmmm. I would have thought that incomplete means that there's not enough information to further locate the problem and hence the bug is impossible to work on. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Aisthesis wrote: > Incomplete because, in order to confirm that the patch is acceptable to > be included

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-10-12 Thread José Tomás Atria
ehem, i don't know who is supposed to decide this, but i think that such a visible usability bug on one of the three typical configurations (ATI's fglrx) will be a major showstopper for many new users. We need to find a solution, any solution, that does not require googling and installing some dar

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-10-07 Thread José Tomás Atria
ppa rep with the patch for karmic plis? On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:45 AM, svaens wrote: > deb package? > What deb package, and what is the link? > Good for jaunty? Or only Karmic ? > > thanks! > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Xavier wrote: > >> Downloaded deb packages from launchpad resource. I

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 369042] Re: [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/ Others?] fglrx + Kwin with OpenGL desktop effects = failed resume

2009-10-02 Thread José Tomás Atria
Apparently this bug has been fixed in Catalyst version 9.8. Any chance of backporting the driver into jaunty? ** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled

2009-09-28 Thread José Tomás Atria
i've been using the patched xorg, and xorg reports 3% memory usage after 8 hours of uptime (just updated today). I'll check back in the morning. There are some weird artifacts for a fraction of a second when drawing windows, though. Still, better than those horrible delays. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 a

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 369042] Re: [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/ Others?] fglrx + Kwin with OpenGL desktop effects = failed resume

2009-08-18 Thread José Tomás Atria
Hey Timothy, could you please post the contents of your xorg.conf file to see what did ati-config put in there? actually, if you have a copy of your old xorg.conf, a diff between the two files would be extremely useful. thanks! On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, tmokeefe wrote: > Some good news on

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 369042] Re: [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/ Others?] fglrx + Kwin with OpenGL desktop effects = failed resume

2009-08-16 Thread José Tomás Atria
I have tested my idea, by manually disabling composite immediately before suspend and re enabling it immediately after resume, and it works (ie, it doesn't hang). I have written the script to do it (dbus is a pleasure!), but i have been looking for weeks for some way to put it in KDE's suspend/res

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 369042] Re: [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/ Others?] fglrx + Kwin with OpenGL desktop effects = failed resume

2009-08-03 Thread José Tomás Atria
i was just thinking... if the resume fails when Desktop Effects are enabled on suspend, wouldn't it be possible, as a workaround until a proper fix is released, to execute a script that disables desktop effects immediately before suspension, and re-enables them immediately after resume? i'll see i

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 369042] Re: [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/ Others?] fglrx + Kwin with OpenGL desktop effects = failed resume

2009-07-29 Thread José Tomás Atria
@aidar: it's a completely different issue, this is with the propietary fglrx driver, gentoo's is with mesa, this affects kwin when resuming from suspension to memory, that one affects plasma, this is worked around by changing to Xrender compositing, that one is fixed by resetting the plasma conf.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 369042] Re: [HD 3670] fglrx + desktop effects = failed resume

2009-07-29 Thread José Tomás Atria
I can confirm this issue with a HD 4650 card on a VAIO VGN-FW480j, using kde 4.2.98 (kde 4.3 RC 3). ** Summary changed: - [HD 3670] fglrx + desktop effects = failed resume + [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/ Others?] fglrx + Kwin with OpenGL desktop effects = failed resume -- [HD 2600/HD 3670/HD 4650/

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread José Tomás Atria
is there any way to check the upgrade path to determine what else was updated on april 3rd? Because we are certain that the clean vanilla jaunty install doesn't have this issue, right? right? On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:21 PM, zwaldowski wrote: > I still maintain that the version available in Jaun

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread José Tomás Atria
IMHO, please stop with all the discussion about what should have been done, or if linux is ready for the desktop and whatnot. We have a stable release that is recommended as stable to users. ALL users. this stable release has a known problem with intel drivers, the problem was reported as a bug a

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-03 Thread José Tomás Atria
+1 at Bernhard. I have been following this bug closely, and i read the whole 300+ comments, but i got lost in regards as to which packages are affected, and what versions should introduce fixes, apart from the backported xserver-xorg-video-intel mentioned above. @Bryce: could you give us a little