I agree that felix's patch is superior (apparently the empty buffer's load faster than the ones containing random memory contents, besides the already discussed security and aestethics aspects), but at least for me, i'm experiencing memory leaks with both alternatives.
Incidentally, i seem to observe a higher memory leaking with newer X versions as karmic release approaches than in jaunty or firts karmic betas... do you think that a memory usage test in a virual machine will do any good? i can set up a couple of vms and leave them running to see memory usage patterns... On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Daëavelwyn <daeavel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On my dell studio xps 1640 with ati radeon 3670HD, the best patch is the > feilx kueling 's one !! ;-) > (thanks so much félix :) ) > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:08 PM, AlexE <a...@nextworld.de> wrote: > >> On my machine, the better patch definitely is the one by Felix Kuehlig. >> Works like a charm. >> >> -- >> [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects >> enabled >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >> of the bug. >> > > -- > [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects > enabled > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem -- [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
