On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 15:21 +, pmgazz wrote:
> Thanks John - and we'll probably be doing another free PiTiVi workshop
> (along with John's graphics workshops) in early Spring
Last night, I had a play with Avidemux. I really am impressed by the
edit facilities. In some ways it's fairly basic
Hello Barry,
I have been using PiTiVi recently, after a great course run at Fossbox. We
used an MP4 container with a DivX codec. Output of this was great and was
relatively quick to render and is accepted by Vimeo and YouTube. I really
liked the editing options in PiViTi and found it very eas
On 4 November 2010 10:50, John Stevenson wrote:
> Looking at the recently created OpenShot website http://www.openshot.org/,
> it is looking a really good option for video editing, with lots of
> features. It also uses the Media Lovin Toolkit http://www.mltframework.org/
> as opposed to the Gstre
On 4 November 2010 09:50, Barry Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 00:02 +, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > Have you tried Lombard? [1] It's still a 0.1 version but it may be worth
> > checking. It's done by Yorba, the same people who do Shotwell.
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> I've just looked at the Lom
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 00:02 +, Bruno Girin wrote:
> Have you tried Lombard? [1] It's still a 0.1 version but it may be worth
> checking. It's done by Yorba, the same people who do Shotwell.
Thanks for that.
I've just looked at the Lombard wiki. It gives some really useful
comparisons. Howev
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:00 +, Barry Drake wrote:
> Hi there
>
> Just thought others might be interested in my experience of video
> editing. I tried PiTiVi and was disappointed in the output quality. No
> matter what options I tried, the result suffered from pattern
> interference int
I used the tovid out of the repo's
sudo apt-get install tovid
and had to re-remember how to use the thing :D
The following forum post jogged my memory a bit:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=183936
Michael
On 03/11/10 21:39, Barry Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:14 +, mich
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:14 +, michael wrote:
> Agree with you about PiTiVi, excellent front end but poor rendering.
Since posting, I tried OpenShot and it seems to be a good GUI with good
rendering. I may be using that in future to make the edit (from
captures under Kino) followed by burning
Hi,
Have just done a mate's wedding video.
Agree with you about PiTiVi, excellent front end but poor rendering.
I ended up converting the footage to digital video using ffmpeg and then
used kino to edit and render into the end result.
I also changed the sound track a bit by using Audacity to t
On 3 November 2010 12:28, Barry Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:28 +, John Stevenson wrote:
> >
> > I have been using PiTiVi recently, after a great course run at
> > Fossbox. We used an MP4 container with a DivX codec. Output of this
> > was great and was relatively quick to render
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:28 +, John Stevenson wrote:
>
> I have been using PiTiVi recently, after a great course run at
> Fossbox. We used an MP4 container with a DivX codec. Output of this
> was great and was relatively quick to render and is accepted by Vimeo
> and YouTube. I really liked
On 3 November 2010 11:00, Barry Drake wrote:
> Hi there
>
> Just thought others might be interested in my experience of video
> editing. I tried PiTiVi and was disappointed in the output quality. No
> matter what options I tried, the result suffered from pattern
> interference introduced d
Hi there
Just thought others might be interested in my experience of video
editing. I tried PiTiVi and was disappointed in the output quality. No
matter what options I tried, the result suffered from pattern
interference introduced during the render.
Kino captures and edits just fine an
13 matches
Mail list logo
