Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread TheVeech
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 17:09 +, Pete Ryland wrote: > This is not the kind of atmosphere that we want > to encourage. Quite. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Pete Ryland
On 20/03/07, Chris Rowson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lets not descend into the madness of political correctness for the > sake of proving a point. It's petty, pathetic and and devalues the > rule set underpinning it. Agreed, no harm may have been intended, but as soon as harm was done, whether i

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Pete Ryland
On 20/03/07, Tony Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pete Ryland wrote: > > It is offensive. The joke's premise is based on the (untrue) > > generalisation that all women are unfathomable. > > Or rather that women are unfathomable by men. That's offensive to men > isn't it? The point of the joke

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Chris Rowson
I think that we've got to be adult about this. I believe that the code of conduct - like most other rules in our society is meant to protect people and values. Where we start to go wrong, is by using any set of rules to their maximum extent to prove a point, appear clever or knowledgeable or to s

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Tony Arnold
Pete, Pete Ryland wrote: > It is offensive. The joke's premise is based on the (untrue) > generalisation that all women are unfathomable. Or rather that women are unfathomable by men. That's offensive to men isn't it? Nearly all jokes are based on a premise that usually is not quite true but k

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Pete Ryland
On 20/03/07, Tony Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Caroline Ford wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:23 +, TheVeech wrote: > >> (crap snipped) > >> > >> The Lord replied: 'You want two lanes or four on that bridge?' > >> > > > > That posting is in breach of the Ubuntu code of conduct. > > ht

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Dave Murphy
Tony Arnold wrote: > Well, the instructions were to replace 'women' with 'newbs' when you > read it, so if anything it would be disrespectful to 'newbs'! That's what I get for ignoring the topic line. To digress, surely it would have been better to edit the joke accordingly as everyone knows you c

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Tony Arnold
Nick, Nicholas Butler wrote: > As for me ive found long term members to be just as unfathomable and > mysterious and new and fresh members. I think that exciting especially > when you consider that its this very mix of people that are the sort to > spend time working out how to build bridges j

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Nicholas Butler
Considering the code of conduct; Was posting the joke considerate to others ? Well I and you the reader cannot really answer this. If I was however to be considerate of Veechs' position I can only imagine that he felt it was a measured opinion. Even if I did not feel that it was delivered in a

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Tony Arnold
Dave Murphy wrote: > Tony Arnold wrote: >> I've just read the code (again) and I don't see which bit of it is being >> breached? > > I would interpret it as being disrespectful to women (and atheists :)). Well, the instructions were to replace 'women' with 'newbs' when you read it, so if anythi

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Dave Murphy
Tony Arnold wrote: > I've just read the code (again) and I don't see which bit of it is being > breached? I would interpret it as being disrespectful to women (and atheists :)). -- Dave Murphy - http://www.schwuk.com -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Gary Kearley
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 08:33 +, Caroline Ford wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:23 +, TheVeech wrote: > >(crap snipped) > > > > The Lord replied: 'You want two lanes or four on that bridge?' > > > > That posting is in breach of the Ubuntu code of conduct. > http://www.ubuntu.com/communit

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Tony Arnold
Caroline, Caroline Ford wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:23 +, TheVeech wrote: >> (crap snipped) >> >> The Lord replied: 'You want two lanes or four on that bridge?' >> > > That posting is in breach of the Ubuntu code of conduct. > http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct I've just read the

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Code of conduct (was For 'women' read 'newbs')

2007-03-20 Thread Caroline Ford
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:23 +, TheVeech wrote: >(crap snipped) > > The Lord replied: 'You want two lanes or four on that bridge?' > That posting is in breach of the Ubuntu code of conduct. http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct Thanks Caroline -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lis