> On 26 April 2010 15:08, Markie wrote:
>> [snip]
>> You can backup and re-instate your previous apps via command line;
>>
>> To backup
>>
>> Code:
>>
>> sudo dpkg –get-selections> myPackages
>>
[snip]
Thanks for all the suggestions and tips for moving to 64bit. In the end
I upgraded my RAM to
> -Original Message-
> From: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu-uk-
> boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Ibbotson
> Sent: 27 April 2010 12:32
> To: UK Ubuntu Talk
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] 64 bit lucid install
>
> On 26 April 2010 1
On 27/04/10 13:39, Liam Proven wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Rob Beard wrote:
>
>> Strange, I'm running Lucid 32-Bit on my machine (with 4GB Ram) and it
>> sees the full 4GB fine. I gather the kernel has got PAE extensions or
>> whatever it is to support over 3.25GB (although I gather
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Would some of the missing memory be video memory perhaps which is
> shared, from the main memory.
Nope. That is why some RAM in a 4GB machine is inaccessible to a
32-bit OS: because the memory taken by the graphics card & other I/O
devices i
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Rob Beard wrote:
> Strange, I'm running Lucid 32-Bit on my machine (with 4GB Ram) and it
> sees the full 4GB fine. I gather the kernel has got PAE extensions or
> whatever it is to support over 3.25GB (although I gather the memory
> limit per process is 4GB, not
On 27/04/10 12:32, Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
> On 26 April 2010 14:45, ian pettitt wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> With the upcoming release of 10.04, I have decided to reinstall my work
>> machine and move from 32 to 64 bit. I need to run multiple virtual
>> machines and this will mean that if everything wor
On 27/04/10 12:34, Paul Sutton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
>>[...]
>> I'm running 64-bit Lucid with 4GB of RAM, however Lucid is only seeing
>> 3.1GB. It may be I have to set something in BIOS I haven't had time to
>> look into it fully yet, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
> On 26 April 2010 14:45, ian pettitt wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> With the upcoming release of 10.04, I have decided to reinstall my work
>> machine and move from 32 to 64 bit. I need to run multiple virtual
>> machines and this will
On 26 April 2010 14:45, ian pettitt wrote:
> Hi All
>
> With the upcoming release of 10.04, I have decided to reinstall my work
> machine and move from 32 to 64 bit. I need to run multiple virtual
> machines and this will mean that if everything works as hoped I will be
> able to replace the secon
On 26 April 2010 15:08, Markie wrote:
>[snip]
> You can backup and re-instate your previous apps via command line;
>
> To backup
>
> Code:
>
> sudo dpkg –get-selections > myPackages
>
> To re-instate
>
> Code:
>
> sudo dpkg –set-selections < myPackages && sudo apt-get dselect-upgrade
>
> You can a
On 26/04/10 17:54, Markie wrote:
> [...]
> Are you using TB3.x ? Its much better than the previous releases imo. Im
> running 3.04. Are you saying the lightning extension does not work on
> 64-bit?
Hello, Mark.
Yes, I'm using TB 3.0.4 - The 64-bit version in the repo's seems to be
for icedove +
On 26/04/10 18:26, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> On 26 April 2010 17:25, Tony Travis wrote:
>>
>> I'm still not able to get Thunderbird running 'Lightning' in 64-bit,
>> though - Anyone else succeeded? I've installed the ia32 libraries.
>>
>
> http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/ligh
On 26 April 2010 17:25, Tony Travis wrote:
>
> I'm still not able to get Thunderbird running 'Lightning' in 64-bit,
> though - Anyone else succeeded? I've installed the ia32 libraries.
>
http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/releases/1.0b1rc1/contrib/linux-x86_64/
64-bit v
Hi Tony
Well, it's because the BIOS tells GRUB what it thinks the disks are
> while the USB disk is still connected...
>
Thanks! At least I know what to do now :-)
>
> I'm still not able to get Thunderbird running 'Lightning' in 64-bit,
> though - Anyone else succeeded? I've installed the ia32
On 26/04/10 15:08, Markie wrote:
> [...]
> Im going to be doing exactly the same thing, I wasnt sure about 64 bit
> since I only have 2GB but it seems to make better sense
Hello, Markie.
I'm running the 10.04-rc-desktop-amd64 in 2GiB on my Asus A6K laptop:
I've just upgraded to the rc today: I'v
Dan Attwood wrote:
> I've went with the 64bit on my desktop this time round and so far it's
> all good. Although I'll re-instaling flash tonight after Jonathons comment.
>
> My grand plan was to ditch both virtualbox and vm server 2 and give KVM
> a try. I like the idea of being able to migrate
On 26 April 2010 15:08, Markie wrote:
> Hi Ian
>
> Im using virtualbox for a XP image occasionally, I wonder if a image created
> under a 32bit virtual box will be portable to a 64bit virtual box?
>
>
> Mark
Fully portable; it's just a drive image. It will run the same on any
platform (32-bit/64-
Hi Ian
> With the upcoming release of 10.04, I have decided to reinstall my work
> machine and move from 32 to 64 bit. I need to run multiple virtual
> machines
>
Im going to be doing exactly the same thing, I wasnt sure about 64 bit since
I only have 2GB but it seems to make better sense
>
>
I've went with the 64bit on my desktop this time round and so far it's all
good. Although I'll re-instaling flash tonight after Jonathons comment.
My grand plan was to ditch both virtualbox and vm server 2 and give KVM a
try. I like the idea of being able to migrate machines between my server and
On 26 April 2010 14:45, ian pettitt wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have looked on the Ubuntu wiki and forum for any advice or things to
> watch out for, but I was wondering if anyone had
> recommendations/comments before I make the move. I will be installing
> it in an additional partition, so I will stil
Hi All
With the upcoming release of 10.04, I have decided to reinstall my work
machine and move from 32 to 64 bit. I need to run multiple virtual
machines and this will mean that if everything works as hoped I will be
able to replace the second machine I have running windows XP - I work in
a W
21 matches
Mail list logo
