On 12 April 2010 18:30, Chris Rowson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kris Douglas wrote:
>>
>> On 12 April 2010 17:28, Daniel Case wrote:
>> > Did you modify the boot files in partition 1 so it linked correctly to
>> > the
>> > new kernal?
>>
>> I'd say yes, but I honestly don't kn
On 12 April 2010 18:25, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 17:37, Kris Douglas wrote:
>> On 12 April 2010 17:28, Daniel Case wrote:
>>> Did you modify the boot files in partition 1 so it linked correctly to the
>>> new kernal?
>>
>> I'd say yes, but I honestly don't know, I used my poor know
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 17:28, Daniel Case wrote:
> > Did you modify the boot files in partition 1 so it linked correctly to
> the
> > new kernal?
>
> I'd say yes, but I honestly don't know, I used my poor knowledge of
> grub to change the boot lin
On 12 April 2010 17:37, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 17:28, Daniel Case wrote:
>> Did you modify the boot files in partition 1 so it linked correctly to the
>> new kernal?
>
> I'd say yes, but I honestly don't know, I used my poor knowledge of
> grub to change the boot line in grub.conf
Ooo.its brilliant..thanks again: )
On 12 Apr 2010 18:07, "Kris Douglas" wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:04, javadayaz wrote:
> Ive got it working...thats made my ...
No probs mate, enjoy :)
--
Kris Douglas,
NODE Computer Systems
Web Hosting, Design and Server Administration, Technical Support
On 12 April 2010 18:04, javadayaz wrote:
> Ive got it working...thats made my daythank you
No probs mate, enjoy :)
--
Kris Douglas,
NODE Computer Systems
Web Hosting, Design and Server Administration, Technical Support &
Computer Construction
T. 02030518469
M. 07728574285
--
Ive got it working...thats made my daythank you
On 12 Apr 2010 17:25, "Kris Douglas" wrote:
On 12 April 2010 15:56, javadayaz wrote:
> sorry to be a pain but whereabouts ...
Tools>Preferences then under "show settings", bottom left select the
All option, after that, go to the interface drop
On 12/04/10 16:30, Paul Sutton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Beardall wrote:
>
>> I certainly don't want to be pushing a political agenda (especially
>> where it's not wanted) and Alan makes a perfectly reasonable point but I
>> can't help but consider the f
On 12 April 2010 17:28, Daniel Case wrote:
> Did you modify the boot files in partition 1 so it linked correctly to the
> new kernal?
I'd say yes, but I honestly don't know, I used my poor knowledge of
grub to change the boot line in grub.conf to the new kern, but that's
about as 'changed' as it
Did you modify the boot files in partition 1 so it linked correctly to the
new kernal?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 15:35, Alan Pope wrote:
> > On 12 April 2010 16:31, Daniel Case wrote:
> >> Kris, i have had a quick look through the files and they sh
Yes, you're right I didn't realise. I noticed the mute option doesn't appear
in the list when I've opened the email, and I have to go back to the inbox
to mute the conversation which is a bit of a pain. The fact that you can't
mute messages after you've applied a filter seems to restrict functional
On 12 April 2010 15:56, javadayaz wrote:
> sorry to be a pain but whereabouts in options will i find it?
Tools>Preferences then under "show settings", bottom left select the
All option, after that, go to the interface dropdown, click main
interfaces, then on that page tick http remote control in
On 12 April 2010 15:35, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 16:31, Daniel Case wrote:
>> Kris, i have had a quick look through the files and they should work with
>> 10.04, but theres only one way to find out ;)
>>
>> If you do manage it, let me know (also let me know if it breaks and i will
>> h
Do not do that. That will remove your personal GPG keys, if they exist.
Tyler
On Monday 12 April 2010 17:00:04 Daniel Case wrote:
> Have you tried getting rid of the folder /home/cjm/.gnupg ?
>
> It should force it to redownload the pubkeys properly.
>
> ~Daniel
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:
Have you tried getting rid of the folder /home/cjm/.gnupg ?
It should force it to redownload the pubkeys properly.
~Daniel
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Cornelius Mostert <
corneliusmost...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello all
> I am getting this every time I do an Update from Update Manager
>
sorry to be a pain but whereabouts in options will i find it?
On 12 April 2010 16:04, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> On Monday 12 April 2010 15:26:01 Kris Douglas wrote:
> > As far as I know, you just turn it on in VLC's options and it just
> > works on your_ip:vlcport
> >
> > ifconfig in terminal to
Hello all
I am getting this every time I do an Update from Update Manager
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 9BDB3D89CE49EC21
I have tried this: sudo gpg --keyserver keyserver.ub
On 12 April 2010 16:33, Stephen Garton wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 16:30, Harry Rickards wrote:
>> On 12 April 2010 16:21, Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
>>>
>>> I use GMail and I see no option to 'mute' threads. A quick google
>>> search shows that this is possible using the 'm' key. However I apply
>>>
On 12 April 2010 16:31, Daniel Case wrote:
> Kris, i have had a quick look through the files and they should work with
> 10.04, but theres only one way to find out ;)
>
> If you do manage it, let me know (also let me know if it breaks and i will
> have a look see why) :)
>
It would be preferable
For my penneth worth, I saw no flame in this discussion.
Everyone conducting themselves impeccably.
:)
JT
On 12 April 2010 16:30, Paul Sutton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Beardall wrote:
> > I certainly don't want to be pushing a political agenda (especial
On 12 April 2010 16:30, Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 16:21, Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
>> On 12 April 2010 16:06, Tommy Pyatt wrote:
>>> Since I see you are using gmail, assuming that you are accessing your mail
>>> through the standard interface, there is a function to 'Mute' conversati
Kris, i have had a quick look through the files and they should work with
10.04, but theres only one way to find out ;)
If you do manage it, let me know (also let me know if it breaks and i will
have a look see why) :)
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 8 April 2010 13:48
On 12 April 2010 16:21, Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 16:06, Tommy Pyatt wrote:
>> Since I see you are using gmail, assuming that you are accessing your mail
>> through the standard interface, there is a function to 'Mute' conversations
>> if you prefer to be excluded from responses t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Beardall wrote:
> I certainly don't want to be pushing a political agenda (especially
> where it's not wanted) and Alan makes a perfectly reasonable point but I
> can't help but consider the following: For a group of Linux supporters
> [albeit, a
You can do it, tick the box to the left of the message in the inbox and
select the 'Mute' option from the 'More Actions' drop-down.
Tommy
On 12 April 2010 16:21, Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 16:06, Tommy Pyatt wrote:
> > Since I see you are using gmail, assuming that you are acces
On 12/04/10 16:21, Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 16:06, Tommy Pyatt wrote:
>
>> Since I see you are using gmail, assuming that you are accessing your mail
>> through the standard interface, there is a function to 'Mute' conversations
>> if you prefer to be excluded from responses t
On 12 April 2010 16:06, Tommy Pyatt wrote:
> Since I see you are using gmail, assuming that you are accessing your mail
> through the standard interface, there is a function to 'Mute' conversations
> if you prefer to be excluded from responses to the thread. I use the
> function frequently with ma
I didnt mean any hostilities either, it was a genuine question. Its did
seem strange to me that something like this bill is not discussed on a
newsgroup like this. Nothing has been brought forward about it at all. I
am not really sure why its turned into a flame.
Sad really,
John,.
On 12/04/
On 12/04/10 16:06, Tommy Pyatt wrote:
> Apologies Alan, I did not mean any hostility in my response to your
> email, which was a fair and reasonable comment. I just wanted to point
> out that I have no problems with Paula's original email, as I'm sure I'm
> not the only one.
No need to apologise.
I do see Alan's point - and I've said most of what I felt needed to be
said now :)
Paula
/ www.fossbox.org.uk
pa...@fossbox.org.uk
Tel: 020 7481 8479
Skype: bastubis
/
Alan Lord (News) wrote:
> On 12/04/10 15:13, John Matthews wrote:
>
>> I have to admit, I wondered why such a subject shoul
Apologies Alan, I did not mean any hostility in my response to your email,
which was a fair and reasonable comment. I just wanted to point out that I
have no problems with Paula's original email, as I'm sure I'm not the only
one.
Since I see you are using gmail, assuming that you are accessing you
On Monday 12 April 2010 15:26:01 Kris Douglas wrote:
> As far as I know, you just turn it on in VLC's options and it just
> works on your_ip:vlcport
>
> ifconfig in terminal to find your IP, and I'm pretty sure VLC tells
> you the port.
You can find the port directly with something like:
netstat
On 12/04/10 15:13, John Matthews wrote:
> I have to admit, I wondered why such a subject should be so taboo. It
> affects us a lot more than we really would like to admit.
>
> I would genuinely like to know why it should have such a negative
> response from somebody like Alan, and why it is discour
ok thats helpful...i will try this in the first instance.
On 12 April 2010 15:37, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 14:29, javadayaz wrote:
> > Ill try this..but it doesnt seem that easy to me!
> > In case anyone is wondering im trying to use my phone to connect to my pc
> > via wifi to us
I think Alan's getting the fuzzy end of the lollipop here. In all fairness
(and I'm not trying to put words in his mouth) I think he was simply trying
to advise that discussion lists need to stay within certain parameters in
order to stop going off topic and thus risk descending into slanging
match
On 12 April 2010 14:29, javadayaz wrote:
> Ill try this..but it doesnt seem that easy to me!
> In case anyone is wondering im trying to use my phone to connect to my pc
> via wifi to use vlc as a remote.
Yeah, I use my HTC Hero for the same thing, and it seems to work ok :)
So long as you aren't
Ill try this..but it doesnt seem that easy to me!
In case anyone is wondering im trying to use my phone to connect to my pc
via wifi to use vlc as a remote.
On 12 April 2010 15:26, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 14:21, javadayaz wrote:
> > So far i haven't seen anything that a layman
On 12 April 2010 14:21, javadayaz wrote:
> So far i haven't seen anything that a layman like could use to set this up.
> Can anyone help me with this please?
> Rgs
> Javad
> --
> ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
>
>
So far i haven't seen anything that a layman like could use to set this up.
Can anyone help me with this please?
Rgs
Javad
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
I have to admit, I wondered why such a subject should be so taboo. It
affects us a lot more than we really would like to admit.
I would genuinely like to know why it should have such a negative
response from somebody like Alan, and why it is discouraged.
John
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
On 12/04/10 13:14, Alan Lord (News) wrote:
> On 12/04/10 13:10, pa...@fossbox.org.uk wrote:
>> Yes, I know - I shouldn't rant either cos I'm an NGO and not supposed to
>> be political ;)
>
> I'm not sure what the "rules" are for this mailing list but it seems to
> me this thread has left the discus
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:15 +0100, Alan Lord (News)"
wrote:
> I'm not sure what the "rules" are for this mailing list but it seems
> to me this thread has left the discussion of the deb and is becoming a
> general political rant. Presumably there are other lists where stuff
> not really to do with
I certainly don't want to be pushing a political agenda (especially where
it's not wanted) and Alan makes a perfectly reasonable point but I can't
help but consider the following: For a group of Linux supporters [albeit, a
specific distribution], it seems a bit odd that there isn't more discussion
Personally, I am quite interested in discussions of this type as laws
affecting copyright have significant implications in the FOSS community, and
I assume that there are many others on the list that are interested also. I
understand your point Alan, but I don't see the value in discouraging this
t
On 8 April 2010 13:48, Daniel Case wrote:
> Alright :)
>
> I'l put it here and on the etherpad, i mainly followed this guild:
> http://magician.gforums.de/wiki/index.php5?title=UNE_Installation
> but a lot of it is wrong, and one of its packages is packaged badly, so iv
> repackaged them both and
On 12/04/10 13:10, pa...@fossbox.org.uk wrote:
> Yes, I know - I shouldn't rant either cos I'm an NGO and not supposed to
> be political ;)
I'm not sure what the "rules" are for this mailing list but it seems to
me this thread has left the discussion of the deb and is becoming a
general politica
Yes, I know - I shouldn't rant either cos I'm an NGO and not supposed to
be political ;)
Maybe the answer for an org like Canonical (who'd be noticed!) is to be
extremely careful picking issues and to ensure that the issue is the
legitimacy of Ubuntu/FOSS - it could be useful to focus on the softw
I've got it, too. I think it's difficult and uncertain territory for
something like Canonical to get involved in and free software supporters run
the risk of being painted even more like anarchists by raising our voices
but I think not doing so risks a number of the freedoms we rely on in being
abl
Just got a mail from 38 Degrees (don't know who else got one). They're
embarking on a campaign against lobbying which is the most sensible
course of action I can think of for those who want to continue to take
action about this:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/speakout/PPCDEBlobbying
This isn't j
Green Party has decent digital policies. But I live in a Labour
stronghold in East London where there's a risk of BNP returning MPs in
up to 4 boroughs. I'm not sure whether to vote strategically to try to
keep the Tories/BNP out or to vote Green. BNP is fielding candidates in
my Borough but it isn
I think there has been general agreement in the silos of government
since the 'mysociety No 10' fiasco that 'participatory' democracy is a
bad idea because the public is too thick to understand the issues facing
modern society. The public may stupidly associate the socialist party
with outmoded ide
Well, yes, but it's a license - for what it's worth in terms of
practical enforcement but, nevertheless, a revised form of ol' fashioned
civil law?
Paula
/ www.fossbox.org.uk
pa...@fossbox.org.uk
Tel: 020 7481 8479
Skype: bastubis
/
Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 08/04/2010 10:14, pa...@fossbox.org.u
On 12 Apr 2010, at 09:14, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 09:08, Cornelius Mostert
> wrote:
>> It looks like Ubuntu MID is not live any longer, the last update seems to be
>> 8.04... Now I am wondering what would be a good LIVE/ACTIVE distro to make
>> use of for MID devices... I am thinking
On 12 April 2010 09:08, Cornelius Mostert
wrote:
> It looks like Ubuntu MID is not live any longer, the last update seems to be
> 8.04... Now I am wondering what would be a good LIVE/ACTIVE distro to make
> use of for MID devices... I am thinking of course of the Joggler but also
> other devices..
Hello all
It looks like Ubuntu MID is not live any longer, the last update seems to be
8.04... Now I am wondering what would be a good LIVE/ACTIVE distro to make
use of for MID devices... I am thinking of course of the Joggler but also
other devices...
Thanx
--
__
55 matches
Mail list logo
