Guys, I need a little help.
I'm thinking about working on some UI designs with *pencil *tool on Firefox
and putting the results on the Wiki's page for UbuntuTV Designs.
How can I put my design on Ubuntu Wiki?
Thanks
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tv
Post to : ubuntu-tv@lists.
Hi.
I was thinking about Ubuntu TV after seeing Alan Bells thoughts.
1) The TV is also a Big Screen.
I disagree with the idea that Ubuntu TV should only be TV. What I would
like, is to have one TV-mode for actually watching TV, and another for
an extra desktop thing. I think it would be nice
On 28/11/11 19:01, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro wrote:
Guys, I need a little help.
I'm thinking about working on some UI designs with /pencil /tool on
Firefox and putting the results on the Wiki's page for UbuntuTV Designs.
How can I put my design on Ubuntu Wiki?
Thanks
in short, put you
Ubuntu TV being desktop and having a TV mode seems to defeat the purpose of
TV, it would complicate the whole experience.
Multiple accounts would be good, probably necessary when working with
Ubuntu One. I don't think it should ask for login at startup though as it
slows down getting to content (I
How about dropping in all together? Only lock certain parts, like x-rated
movies and the time-grid part etc. No need to log in to watch recorded
movies accessible for all ages or other content.
Again, only logging in when you come to "dangerous" parts of the system for
young kids.
With metta, Chri
Do a basic parental lock until someone logs in.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Chris wrote:
> How about dropping in all together? Only lock certain parts, like x-rated
> movies and the time-grid part etc. No need to log in to watch recorded
> movies accessible for all ages or other content.
>
What about taking a cue from existing set-top boxes (i.e. DirectTV)?
Don't worry about user accounts at all (From an end-user perspective,
and content-wise), and allow access to content below a certain maturity
Level. Then, when the user tries to access restricted content (like an
R-rated movie
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Callum Saunders wrote:
> Do a basic parental lock until someone logs in.
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Chris wrote:
>>
>> How about dropping in all together? Only lock certain parts, like x-rated
>> movies and the time-grid part etc. No need to log in to w
How else do we deal with managing Ubuntu One content?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Mashos wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Callum Saunders
> wrote:
> > Do a basic parental lock until someone logs in.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Chris wrote:
> >>
> >> How about
Den 28. nov. 2011 21:55, skrev Ian Santopietro:
What about taking a cue from existing set-top boxes (i.e. DirectTV)?
Don't worry about user accounts at all (From an end-user perspective,
and content-wise), and allow access to content below a certain
maturity Level.
There are more reasons why
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Callum Saunders wrote:
> How else do we deal with managing Ubuntu One content?
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Mashos wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Callum Saunders
>> wrote:
>> > Do a basic parental lock until someone logs in.
>> >
>>
Authenticate with a paired device, and use that to sign in to U1?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:12, Callum Saunders wrote:
> How else do we deal with managing Ubuntu One content?
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Mashos wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Callum Saunders
>> wr
> There are more reasons why I want to have different users. For instance, you>
> should be able to pause whatever it is you're playing, go away, let others>
> use the TV, and when you come back, you just press play.
That is a good point, but there are better ways of managing content
other than l
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 28. nov. 2011 21:55, skrev Ian Santopietro:
>>
>> What about taking a cue from existing set-top boxes (i.e. DirectTV)? Don't
>> worry about user accounts at all (From an end-user perspective, and
>> content-wise), and allow access t
Den 28. nov. 2011 22:41, skrev Ian Santopietro:
There are more reasons why I want to have different users. For instance, you>
should be able to pause whatever it is you're playing, go away, let others> use
the TV, and when you come back, you just press play.
That is a good point, but there a
Now we're talking. And when it's paired to such a device (e.g. a netbook)
then you might use it as a desktop enlarger. But please make some
storyboards, that way we have comparisons and makes it easier to
collaborate the different ideas into 1.
For how to make those storyboard, read here:
https://
Den 28. nov. 2011 22:48, skrev Thomas Mashos:
I could see the big screen as an extension of the netbook, but that
sounds like something solved via a plugin. As for the multiple user
scenario, I think while it's a neat idea, it's a fringe use case.
Synergy is a very simple and easy app. It's re
On 11/28/2011 03:33 PM, Ian Santopietro wrote:
Authenticate with a paired device, and use that to sign in to U1?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:12, Callum Saunders wrote:
How else do we deal with managing Ubuntu One content?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Mashos wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 28. nov. 2011 22:48, skrev Thomas Mashos:
>>
>> I could see the big screen as an extension of the netbook, but that
>> sounds like something solved via a plugin. As for the multiple user
>> scenario, I think while it's a neat idea,
Exactly. A family of products that work great on their own and even better
together.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Ian Nicholson wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 03:33 PM, Ian Santopietro wrote:
>
>> Authenticate with a paired device, and use that to sign in to U1?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:12,
I'm not going to argue with that; using a TV for more than video is in
idea I already enjoy, and one that I would expect from a complete
Ubuntu TV implementation. However, having two modes (One for TV and
one fr a full desktop) is a bad idea. Instead, how about taking a hint
from other Smart TV OSs
Den 28. nov. 2011 22:50, skrev Chris:
Now we're talking. And when it's paired to such a device (e.g. a
netbook) then you might use it as a desktop enlarger. But please make
some storyboards, that way we have comparisons and makes it easier to
collaborate the different ideas into 1.
It's ready
Den 28. nov. 2011 22:57, skrev Ian Santopietro:
I'm not going to argue with that; using a TV for more than video is in
idea I already enjoy, and one that I would expect from a complete
Ubuntu TV implementation. However, having two modes (One for TV and
one fr a full desktop) is a bad idea. Instea
They wouldn't, necessarily, but some apps will be better after being
reworked for a larger screen. LibreOffice is a great example.
Facilities currently exist in GTK3 to implement different UIs for the
same app through XML.
On the other hand, most of the games currently available would work
fine on
On 28/11/11 20:55, Ian Santopietro wrote:
What about taking a cue from existing set-top boxes (i.e. DirectTV)?
Absolutely! A TV is used and viewed very differently from a desktop: you
are further away from the screen, it uses a simplistic interface
(remote), no keyboard or mouse, no touch. It
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ian Santopietro wrote:
> They wouldn't, necessarily, but some apps will be better after being
> reworked for a larger screen. LibreOffice is a great example.
> Facilities currently exist in GTK3 to implement different UIs for the
> same app through XML.
>
> On the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> On 28/11/11 20:55, Ian Santopietro wrote:
>
> What about taking a cue from existing set-top boxes (i.e. DirectTV)?
>
> Absolutely! A TV is used and viewed very differently from a desktop: you are
> further away from the screen, it uses a simpli
Den 28. nov. 2011 22:55, skrev Thomas Mashos:
Please walk me through a typical day in the live of this TV for a
family of 4.
Alright.
6AM. Parents get out of bed, do their morning stuff, makes coffee and
switches on their TV to watch the morning news. Only the normal remote
control is neede
Yes. but wifi not bluetooth. Bluetooth has range resrictions and is a major
battery hog, whereas most people will have wifi on in their homes anyway.
It also means that all ubuntu devices in a home can be connected all the
time as long as they are on the wifi.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Jo-
Den 29. nov. 2011 00:15, skrev Callum Saunders:
Yes. but wifi not bluetooth. Bluetooth has range resrictions and is a
major battery hog, whereas most people will have wifi on in their
homes anyway. It also means that all ubuntu devices in a home can be
connected all the time as long as they are
Den 28. nov. 2011 23:54, skrev Thomas Mashos:
I'm not sure I understand the point of OpenOffice type apps on the big
screen. Why do I want to look at a screen that is much farther away
from me to see the data (which BTW you will need to blow up the font
size to see it) when I can see the same da
Bluetooth is slow as hell. Using Bluetooth would mean that a tablet or
phone or laptop or whatever would have to have both bluetooth and wifi on,
assuming they even have bluetooth capabilities.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad <
joerlend.schins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den 29.
Den 29. nov. 2011 00:23, skrev Callum Saunders:
Bluetooth is slow as hell. Using Bluetooth would mean that a tablet or
phone or laptop or whatever would have to have both bluetooth and wifi
on, assuming they even have bluetooth capabilities.
No, I'm talking about using the phone as a simple re
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 16:17, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 29. nov. 2011 00:15, skrev Callum Saunders:
>>
>> Yes. but wifi not bluetooth. Bluetooth has range resrictions and is a
>> major battery hog, whereas most people will have wifi on in their homes
>> anyway. It also means that all ubunt
Den 29. nov. 2011 00:29, skrev Ian Santopietro:
There shouldn't be more than one interface. Having two interfaces is
inconsistent and confusing.
I will never purchase a computer with a big screen which cannot be used
for anything other than watching videos.
Jo-Erlend Schinstad
--
Mailing li
its not a computer with a big screen it's a TV!!
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad <
joerlend.schins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den 29. nov. 2011 00:29, skrev Ian Santopietro:
>
> There shouldn't be more than one interface. Having two interfaces is
>> inconsistent and confusing.
Den 29. nov. 2011 00:44, skrev Callum Saunders:
its not a computer with a big screen it's a TV!!
Oh, ok. I thought it was intended to be used om OMAP4s and similar.
They're perfectly capable of providing a complete PC experience. I
actually used my OMAP3 like that for a little while and that'
On 11/28/2011 04:54 PM, Thomas Mashos wrote:
To the point of "Family of products working together". Please don't
make added functionality come from owning other Ubuntu branded
devices. Make an Android app, IOS app, Windows app, OSX app, etc. If I
wanted to have vendor lock in I would own Apple
I never said it should only be used for viewing videos.
But, TVs are consumption devices, and should be treated as such. Think
of it as a large tablet. Tablets are great devices for watching
videos, surfing the internet, reading email, IM, and games. They also
work great for photo galleries, and l
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 28. nov. 2011 23:54, skrev Thomas Mashos:
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the point of OpenOffice type apps on the big
>> screen. Why do I want to look at a screen that is much farther away
>> from me to see the data (which BTW you
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Ian Nicholson wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 04:54 PM, Thomas Mashos wrote:
>>
>> To the point of "Family of products working together". Please don't make
>> added functionality come from owning other Ubuntu branded devices. Make an
>> Android app, IOS app, Windows app, OS
Den 29. nov. 2011 01:10, skrev Ian Santopietro:
I never said it should only be used for viewing videos.
But, TVs are consumption devices, and should be treated as such. Think
of it as a large tablet. Tablets are great devices for watching
videos, surfing the internet, reading email, IM, and game
Den 29. nov. 2011 01:15, skrev Thomas Mashos:
Simple, because I have to build it. Working on the Mythbuntu team for
the last four years has shown that there are far more dreamers than
there are programmers. I'm not spending my time on something I don't
think is necessary. This is why I proposed
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 29. nov. 2011 01:15, skrev Thomas Mashos:
>>
>> Simple, because I have to build it. Working on the Mythbuntu team for the
>> last four years has shown that there are far more dreamers than there are
>> programmers. I'm not spending
Den 29. nov. 2011 01:30, skrev Thomas Mashos:
Someone has to build the option to switch to desktop mode ;)
Well... Yes, that is true. That will be far easier than to build Ubuntu
Desktop as a plugin, though. :)
Jo-Erlend Schinstad
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tv
Post to
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 29. nov. 2011 01:30, skrev Thomas Mashos:
>>
>> Someone has to build the option to switch to desktop mode ;)
>
> Well... Yes, that is true. That will be far easier than to build Ubuntu
> Desktop as a plugin, though. :)
>
> Jo-Erlend
But then why have an Ubuntu TV at all then? Why not just take a
desktop and hook it up to your TV? If that's what you'd like, then why
bother with the TV mode at all? Instead, it sounds like your setup
would work best with a full blown Ubuntu desktop installation, rather
than a customized Ubuntu TV
Den 29. nov. 2011 01:46, skrev Ian Santopietro:
But then why have an Ubuntu TV at all then? Why not just take a
desktop and hook it up to your TV? If that's what you'd like, then why
bother with the TV mode at all? Instead, it sounds like your setup
would work best with a full blown Ubuntu deskto
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 29. nov. 2011 01:46, skrev Ian Santopietro:
>>
>> But then why have an Ubuntu TV at all then? Why not just take a
>> desktop and hook it up to your TV? If that's what you'd like, then why
>> bother with the TV mode at all? Instead,
Den 29. nov. 2011 02:38, skrev Thomas Mashos:
While I agree that having all those features would be pretty neat, we
need to make sure we don't over-complicate things for the end-user.
Great, then we agree. My point is based on the fact that we have to
provide the desktop in any case. I mean,
Additionally, that's a great argument for unity as well.
Sent from my Palm PreOn Nov 28, 2011 20:03, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
Den 29. nov. 2011 02:38, skrev Thomas Mashos:
> While I agree that having all those features would be pretty neat, we
> need to make
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 29. nov. 2011 02:38, skrev Thomas Mashos:
>>
>> While I agree that having all those features would be pretty neat, we need
>> to make sure we don't over-complicate things for the end-user.
>
> Great, then we agree. My point is based
. If you agree with all this, then you have to agree that the normal
desktop Unity should be provided.
No, I don't agree. Unity, yes. Full desktop Unity? No.
Honestly, I don't see the point of discussing this. With what you're
suggesting, Ubuntu is already set up to run fine on a TV. This is, qui
Hi folks,
as I read about this team at golem.de, I was really happy to find people
who could be interested in some of my things I tested and did in the
nearer past.
First I wanna tell you something about my couch-potato-PC with Ubuntu
11.10 Unity on it and controlled by a wiimote. My next th
UbuntuTV should absolutely be as simple to use for watching video,
listening to music, etc. as any TV or mobile device today. It should be
simple to use, and the interface should be out of the way and work with a
remote control.
However, I think there is a lot of power and value added by allowing
55 matches
Mail list logo