On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Praks KK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody help me with this below message that I get when I open the
> Ubuntu Software Center, it crashes in Ubuntu- 12.04.1 LTS -desktop-amd 64
> bit.
>
> "Could not initialize the package information"
>
> An unresolvable problem occu
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> A
> couple of weeks ago I failed to install Lubuntu 12.04 from the live CD
> into a 512 MB RAM computer of a friend.
The graphical installer really shouldn't be locking up on 512MB, it
should be erroring out instead. The problem is, the
For those of you braving ARM installations, I tried an sd-based
installation this week and updated the instructions on the wiki page.
Elfy, Carla, et la, I can confirm your findings of this bug(s):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1036742
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
Nio, don't worry! The alternate cd's for the ubuntu flavors are being
retained. I know for a fact lubuntu is keeping alternate cd's -- my
guess is xubuntu will also. I haven't heard confirmation from any flavor
that they are dropping them -- it's a flavor specific decision what
images to ship.T
I find the alternate iso files useful for old computers with low RAM. A
couple of weeks ago I failed to install Lubuntu 12.04 from the live CD
into a 512 MB RAM computer of a friend.
That computer has good graphics and a fair CPU, so the alternate iso
file helped me to make a responsive computer o
I almost forgot -- since this is 12.04.1, the alternate images are a
part of this release :-) Don't forget them! I'm in quantal mode and
didn't even think when I saw them.
FYI, for quantal, we are attempting to reduce our image count (to make
our testing easier and reduce fragmentation for bug
I would point out and clarify I don't want to see any technical
discussion moved off this list and migrating somewhere else -- I don't
think we're at risk of that happening. The FB and g+ pages will serve as
open-ended ads to point back to the group and it's "normal"
communication channels.
W
As many of you noticed (and tested already, awesome!), the 12.04.1 isos
are out on the isotracker:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/230/builds
Right on schedule:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock
Please fill in where you can. I know it was a long weekend of
Some folks ran into this over the weekend, and I've heard enough about
it that I thought a mail wouldn't hurt :-) For those running quantal, a
new X stack has landed that breaks the nvidia driver. For now, the
driver has been disabled. Read more:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/
Hallo
imho FB is just a mass media with a different way to see the things
respect to us, surely is money-centric with all that this concern (no
sharing connaissance, not freedom, violation of rights, ecc).
is also true that we needs to talk of Ubuntu where peoples can listen,
and FB is a well know
Hi Greg,
After some questioning, this is the result...
(12:29:44) phillw: Hi folks, could some one please advise as to against
what this bug should be reported...http://pastebin.com/SRLnr5fB
(12:30:21) tjaalton: the kernel
(12:30:52) phillw: tjaalton: thanks!
(12:31:41) tjaalton: although
(12:32:
Hi Gema,
one of the "wonderful" things about any area is that you will have people
ask technical questions. Rather than scream "RTFM", giving them the links
to where and how to get the information, as opposed to using it as support
area is also a subtle, but important difference :)
"What, there i
On 20/08/12 11:26, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> there is on Facebook a subtle but important difference between open,
> private & hidden. A private group is advertised to all, but requires
> acceptance to join. The reason I chose private is that it does reduce
> the attacks by spammers. As we all have b
Well, we want to PROMOTE QA, right? Then what is the point of making it
private? Everybody will saw that it's private, say "Uh...No" and walk away.
Not the best idea.
Regards,
smartboyhw
2012/8/20 Phill Whiteside
> Hi Gema,
>
> there is on Facebook a subtle but important difference between open
Hi Gema,
there is on Facebook a subtle but important difference between open,
private & hidden. A private group is advertised to all, but requires
acceptance to join. The reason I chose private is that it does reduce the
attacks by spammers. As we all have better things to do than run around
clean
On 19/08/12 16:14, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
> We do need, I think, advertising for QA.
I agree that we need advertising. I fail to see how a private group is
going to do that for us.
Gema
--
Gema Gomez-Solano
Ubuntu QA Team https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
Canonical Ltd. h
16 matches
Mail list logo
