Well, we want to PROMOTE QA, right? Then what is the point of making it private? Everybody will saw that it's private, say "Uh...No" and walk away. Not the best idea.
Regards, smartboyhw 2012/8/20 Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> > Hi Gema, > > there is on Facebook a subtle but important difference between open, > private & hidden. A private group is advertised to all, but requires > acceptance to join. The reason I chose private is that it does reduce the > attacks by spammers. As we all have better things to do than run around > cleaning up after spammers, that is why I chose private. > > I'm no FB expert and simply based things on an existing and quietly > successful FB group [1]. > > Regards, > > Phill. > 1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/ > > On 20 August 2012 08:17, Gema Gomez <gema.gomez-sol...@canonical.com>wrote: > >> On 19/08/12 16:14, Ho Wan Chan wrote: >> > We do need, I think, advertising for QA. >> >> I agree that we need advertising. I fail to see how a private group is >> going to do that for us. >> >> Gema >> -- >> Gema Gomez-Solano <gema.gomez-sol...@canonical.com> >> Ubuntu QA Team https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez >> Canonical Ltd. http://www.canonical.com >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-qa mailing list >> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa >> >> -- >> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >> >> > -- > Ubuntu-qa mailing list > Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa > >
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa