Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Catching CPU run-aways on Touch

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote: > Hi folks, > > In another discussion, James Hunt raised the possibility of > periodically checking for runaway processes on Touch, killing those > consuming 100% CPU while creating a report to be sent to > https://errors.ubuntu.com. > > I've su

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Image package changes now easily spotable

Wow, this view is just amazing. Let's include the appropriate changes URL when announcing new "blessed" daily images to avengers and ubuntu-quality. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote: > On 08/30/2013 06:12 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> >> hi, >> On Fr, 2013-08-30 at

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Coordinating landings for changes affecting Touch images

Hi, thanks Loic! @everyone: we have created a #ubuntu-ci-eng channel on freenode as a one stop place to coordinate and answer your questions on this. Happy to see you there! On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi all! > > Only four and a half weeks to go and phone 1.0 wi

[Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

Hi, so when I install camera-app-autopilot on trust build #1, I simply get: The following NEW packages will be installed: camera-app-autopilot 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. When I do the same for webbrowser-app-autopilot, I get quite a bunch of things installe

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

we have any thoughts on how we would go about getting those bits on the phone once we move to read-only testing? Andy/Sergio/Thomi? > > Thanks! > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> so when I install camera-app-autopilot on t

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies

+slangasek On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge > wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram > > > wrote:

[Ubuntu-phone] Trusty Landing approach for this week

Hi, due to popular request here the bandaid landing process for the next couple days (until we meet in oakland): 1. Debian Imports: - autoflowing under tight supervision of foundations and release team - we will hold the line once we encounter regressions 2. core-dev: - upload o

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] framework 14.04, compatibility and testing

Hi, On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Loïc Minier > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013, Florian Boucault wrote: >> > Is there an authoritative list of dependencies for framework 13.10? >> >> Yes; it's the sdk-libs seed, pulled by the ubuntu

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

Hi, it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot. Let's keep those separate and look at them one by one: >From what I see you basically propose three main things: 1. lets increase velocity of image production so we get 2-3 images produced in devel-proposed per day 2. make cron

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot. >> >> Let's keep those separate and look at them one by

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> hi, >> On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:01 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> > hi, >> > On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> >&

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Ursula Junque wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> > hi, >> > On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: &g

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

Hi, On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:38 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >>> > hi, >>

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Dave Morley wrote: > On 29/11/13 14:43, Alexander Sack wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >>>>

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 15:43 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> > >> > And the archive is always open, besides the landing team syncing the >> > landings first in a ppa and then in proposed, so we should

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Robert Park wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >>> why would it matter at all if an image gets promoted ... in my ideal >>> world we would have bu

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Robert Park > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexander Sack >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> >> why wou

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] A new Image release Proposal

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> it's not about automation or not and as I said before, I am surely not >> fighting automation. I am simply against going back from a >> potent

[Ubuntu-phone] FALSE ALERT - Re: New Landing Plan format!

Hi, this was not a not coordinated step by Rob. The format and process was not agreed and algined with Landing Team. While I know that everyone waits for something like this, but for now we will not use this format. Landing Team will revert the changes done and lets talk about this next year when

[Ubuntu-phone] ANN: Changes to our Upstream Landing and Merge Review Practices in January

Hi all, hope you had a great start in this exciting year 2014. To start off this amazing new year, I wanted to share a slide deck that outlines two exciting improvements to our engineering process that we will roll out during January. - https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/presentation/d/1

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Image 117 touch smoke results

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Paul Larson wrote: > I apologize for not being around most of the afternoon due to illness, > so I didn't get around to looking at these results until pretty late > this evening. > > Mako - all passing again, with the exception of the memevent test > which doesn't n

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: Changes to our Upstream Landing and Merge Review Practices in January

Sorry for not replying earlier, but somehow the reponses to this mailthread didnt make it in my inbox until today? really odd... On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Ted Gould wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 11:51 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > > To start off this amazing new year, I wanted t

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: Changes to our Upstream Landing and Merge Review Practices in January

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 07, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > >>2. The second change unifies our upstream and distribution landing >>process by wrapping the landing activity into the merge review process >>as the final step bef

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Touch smoke test results with 119

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 09.01.2014 11:37, Para Siva wrote: >> >> Unity8: >> >> test_application_lifecycle.ApplicationLifecycleTests.test_app_moves_from_unfocused_to_focused >> >> >> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Trusty/view/Smoke%20Testing/job/trusty-touch-ma

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Touch image 120 results

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Paul Larson wrote: > = Mako = > 100% pass (no reruns for anything) > But we saw several crashes - dialer-app (which has been going on for a > while) as well as unity8 crash in default and in click-image-tests. > Default tests also saw a crash in whoopsie: > http://

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 09.11.14

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Didier Roche wrote: >> >> notes_app (Bill): >> >> http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/112:20140105:20131223.2/5882/notes-app-autopilot/638428/ > > > This test fails very early on (in setUp), waiti

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Touch image 120 results

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:10:14AM +, Evan Dandrea wrote: >> There's a deeper problem here. Didier informs me that they were seeing >> a lot of crashes in unity8 with a smashed stacktrace. They realised >> the dying unity process was get

[Ubuntu-phone] ANN: Ubuntu Core/Touch Android 4.4 support & touch engineering platform/devices/hardware going forward

Hi all, the Ubuntu Core - Phonedations team used their first days during this new year to work on enabling the Android 4.4 enablement stack for our Ubuntu Touch efforts. As moving our platform to a new Android baseline means that we would have to reinvest into all currently supported devices, it's

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 14.01.14

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Didier Roche wrote: > Hey! > > Another landing day in the ubuntu phone world. We had images 126 and 127 > produced. Those contains: > - the latest HUD unblocked from -proposed > - the fix from Martin in python-gobject getting the unity8 AP tests back on > shape \o/

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Fwd: ANN: Ubuntu Core/Touch Android 4.4 support & touch engineering platform/devices/hardware going forward

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Shuduo Sang wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Зонов Роман wrote: >> Sorry. but your decision about manta is minimum...strange. IMHO, manta is >> very important for development. Not because I have one, because manta is a >> tablet with 10-inch display. M

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: Ubuntu Core/Touch Android 4.4 support & touch engineering platform/devices/hardware going forward

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 01/13/2014 08:40 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> 1. Ubuntu Engineering (UE) will make a strong push on the _emulator_ >> during the month' ahead. Goal is to support the emulator for arm and >> x86 as a _primary

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Back on shape, touch image 132 will be promoted

Great! Thanks to everyone who helped getting this back on track. Next week we start with rolling out the new landing process to initial teams and having things green was very important for that. So thanks again! Have a great weekend everyone! On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Didier Roche wrote:

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 01/22/2014 11:10 AM, Colin Watson wrote: >> As I understand it, the agreement from the app-frameworks discussion at >> UDS was that we wanted to be able to offer slightly more fine-grained >> framework declarations, and allow apps to re

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] How to find current framework version (for the click scope, not an app)

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Mike McCracken wrote: > The click scope currently has a hard-coded string > "framework:ubuntu-sdk-13.10" which it uses to query the click store for apps > to display. How about apps that are already installed? Do we take this into account and disable/grey-out apps

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:48:07AM -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> This affects click-apparmor and while we did talk about this a bit at UDS, I >> want to restate it here. I realize click doesn't care about this, but will we >> expect thing

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> How do we find and define what the "sane" combinations are? > > That's trivial - we can start by saying that you only get to use > combi

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:48:07AM -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> This affects click-apparmor and while we did talk about this a bit at UDS, I >> want to restate it here. I realize click doesn't care about this, but will we >> expect thing

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:28PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> Q: does the click package manager also take care of disabling apps >> that are incompatible after you get an image update that stops >> shipping a speci

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >> How about adding such safety belts to our click packaging tools as well? >> >> e.g. bail out or present big warnings if someone tries to package up >&

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Alejandro J. Cura wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Colin Watson wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: >>>> How do we

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 23.01.14

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Sebastian Gomułka wrote: > Hi, > > Recently promoted image 144(on mako) is really unusable. phone hangs up > after about a minute of use, while the proposed image 145 is running pretty > good. > Reproducible? Anyone else sees this? > kr > > /sebastian > > > 2014/

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Ubuntu-appstore-developers] Multiple frameworks for apps

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Alejandro J. Cura wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Alejandro J. Cura > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Jamie Strandboge >> wrote: >>> I think this a great approach. Like Alexander and I have mentioned, >>> something >>> like this could get

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 31.01.2014

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 31.01.2014 18:37, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: >> >> I have tried looking >> into one of the unity8 crashes on install-and-boot tests, but it seems >> the crash file is corrupt. > > > Please whenever you see a unity8 crash, make sure to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.2 info, fixes and rebuilds needed

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Timo Jyrinki wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Holbach > wrote: >> With the project almost ready to land, could we relax the "no regressions" >> policy for this particular landing? > > I agree with your rationale and a part of me would like to see "

[Ubuntu-phone] CITrain jenkins outage

Hi all, Unfortunately, we have an all-stop outage for landings through the CI Train. The team is working with high priority on finding a way to restore service, but there is a chance the we won't be able to bring this back before tomorrow EU morning. Hence, if this means big troubles for you, ple

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] CITrain jenkins outage

Hi, good news is that we managed to bring CI Train back up. Please continue your work. We will do a post-mortem and send more info tomorrow. Thanks and sorry again! On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > Hi all, > > Unfortunately, we have an all-stop outage for

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Summarizing up issues on current touch 4.4 based image

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ted Gould wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:00 +0100, Didier Roche wrote: > > As told yesterday in landing team email, we are blocking any landing > impacting Touch right now to get all focus and energy on fixing issues > without introducing newer one. > > > Not tr

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 25.02.14

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:36:44PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote: >> 3. QMLScene crash (Timo + SDK team) >> -> Timo told that this is in the V8 code and the experts don't have >> time and want to get Qt 5.2 asap rather. > > I agree that debuggin

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 25.02.14

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Timo Jyrinki wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Steve Langasek >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.tag=qt5.2 includes quite a large >>> list of 'critical

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 26.02.14

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Bill Filler wrote: > On 02/26/2014 05:22 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Didier Roche wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Some desktop only update are still flowing in through CI Train, however, we >>> are still blocked by not being a

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Ubuntu Download Manager broken since #213

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Manuel de la Pena wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken >>> ubuntu-download-manager). This

[Ubuntu-phone] vUDS session on landing process/rules/practices

Hi all, wanted to point you to a session we will run at vUDS next week that will focus on iterating and discussing how the landing process currently works and how our rules and practices should look like going forward. - Title: Landing process rules for ubuntu Touch - Time/Place: 2014-03-12 19:

[Ubuntu-phone] ANN: TRAINCON-0 - CITRAIN all stop starting Friday

Hi, I am sending this as a proxy for the not-yet existing TRAINCON bot that will give you updates about our touch image alert state that come with individual landing rules. The TRAINCON levels that were discussed at UDS are: - TRAINCON-2 - everything green, normal landing rules apply - TRAINCON-

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: TRAINCON-0 - CITRAIN all stop starting Friday

Hi, On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thursday, March 20, 2014 18:58:28 Alexander Sack wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am sending this as a proxy for the not-yet existing TRAINCON bot >> that will give you updates about our touch image alert state t

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: TRAINCON-0 - CITRAIN all stop starting Friday

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2014, 18:58 +0100 schrieb Alexander Sack: >> Hi, >> >> I am sending this as a proxy for the not-yet existing TRAINCON bot >> that will give you updates about our touch image

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: TRAINCON-0 - CITRAIN all stop starting Friday

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Freitag, den 21.03.2014, 14:09 +0100 schrieb Alexander Sack: > >> >> The TRAINCON levels that were discussed at UDS are: >> >> >> >> - TRAINCON-2 - everything green, normal landing rule

[Ubuntu-phone] image 250 and TRAINCON level going forward

Hi all, as more data become available, we re-revisited the current management override of QA's earlier decision to not block our promotion for the issue at hand and how we could resume landings. For those that haven't followed this case, the blocker bug this is: - upstream: https://bugreports.qt

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing process, restoring "trunk" for development

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > Hi all! > At the USD there was a session about the landing process, and some > people brought up the point that having the "trunk" branch synchronized > with the archive was inconvenient for developers: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch

[Ubuntu-phone] TRAINCON-0 (v2) - IMPORTANT landing guidelines inside

Hi all, (UPFRONT: this mail includes guidelines and rules outlined below are only meant to apply for our Ubuntu Touch upstream engineering work that goes through the CI Train. So, if you are not working for Canonical on the Ubuntu Touch, this is almost certainly just a FYI for you. If you are inte

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 10.04.14

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Didier Roche wrote: > Hey, > > 3 new images since yesterday, some new regressions discovered, fixes under > progress, and some old blockers fixed! Good news on most of in progress > blockers as well. We're slowly converging to a promotable image! > > #284: > - got

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] TRAINCON-0 (v2) - IMPORTANT landing guidelines inside

alert level) until release. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > Hi all, > > (UPFRONT: this mail includes guidelines and rules outlined below are > only meant to apply for our Ubuntu Touch upstream engineering work > that goes through the CI Train. So,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 20.05.14

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Still no promotions today, sadly. We still have no solid hints on the > WiFi issue, and we also found 2 other big regressions that appeared > since last promotion. So, our current 'blockers': > > * No contacts show

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Renaming to: Ubuntu App Launch

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ted Gould wrote: > > No reason to take on tech debt if we don't have to. Certainly if a bunch of > people reply that it's an issue it's not impossible to do that. But cruft is > cruft, I'd rather be proactive on cleaning it. You will not be able to find all that m

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Developers: changelog quality

Hi, could we work reviewing the changelog itself into our MR review practices used inside teams? kgunn/bfiller/thostr/etc.: what do you think? - Alexander On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > > Due to new breakage with the upstart-app-launch renaming and thus > (again

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Health check tests landing

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Paul Larson wrote: > We'll soon be landing the health-check tests from Colin King in the CI daily > smoke runs for Ubuntu Touch. These tests will trace processes running on the > device and provide stats on things like cpu, wakeup events, and I/O > operations. The

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] whoopsie-upload-all

Hey, good that you ask this. We don't have that hooked into our process yet, but are working on this as we speak. We basically have to first get a view worked into errors.ubuntu.com that allows us to more effectively use that tracker for touch images. For now I would suggest that you raise your i

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] whoopsie-upload-all

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> Am Montag, den 23.06.2014, 17:54 +0100 schrieb Evan Dandrea: >> > On 23 June 2014 13:26, Alan Pope wrote: >> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 20

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Status update: Planned changes to the developer mode/adb access

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > > with RTM approaching quickly we are working on the developer mode to > make it act in a more secure manner. the following changes were > discussed with the security team and will be implemented soon ... this > will require a bunch of

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Status update: Planned changes to the developer mode/adb access

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On 14-07-07 06:43 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> 3) on request of the security team it should not be possible to enable >> adb access if there is no password or the default password set for the >> phablet user so that there is no predictable

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Status update: Planned changes to the developer mode/adb access

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:47:38PM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote: >> >> 4) you will be able to switch developer mode on/off in the >> >> system-settings in a sub page of the "about this device" section [1]. > >> >> the first bit

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Status update: Planned changes to the developer mode/adb access

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Marc Deslauriers [2014-07-08 7:09 -0400]: >> You can make adb detect when running on the emulator, and allow connections >> for >> testing perhaps. > > I wouldn't like to see this. First, we need to test on real hw as well > and don't want to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANNOUNCING: New CI Train Silo Dashboard!

Very Nice! On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Robert Park wrote: > Hi all, > > Some of you may already be familiar with the silo dashboard that I created: > > http://people.canonical.com/~rbpark/citrain/ > > > Well, today I pushed out a major overhaul that has a lot of killer new > features! (those

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] No cellular service from image #113

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Elias K Gardner wrote: > Thanks for your response Alan. In the past these emails have always been > sent directly to me only, not to the entire mailing list. Should I be > passing them on to somebody? I'm not to worried about it and am happy to > just ignore them b

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] RTM silo management in CI Train

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > For the plan to deliver the phone RTM from a derived "ubuntu-rtm" > distribution, we'll need to use a different set of silo PPAs, since PPAs > are attached to a particular distribution (which is clearer now that the > PPA URL format has been c

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] RTM silo management in CI Train

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Colin Watson wrote: >> >> For the plan to deliver the phone RTM from a derived "ubuntu-rtm" >> distribution, we'll need to use a different set of silo PPAs, since PPAs >> are attached to a particular dist

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] RTM silo management in CI Train

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Robert Park wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> if we use the numbers to infer if its stable vs. devel, please make a >> big buffer (e.g. make all stable silos start with 5XX) so we can grow >> silos witho

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 24.07.14

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: > Hello everyone, > > As expected, no image promotions happening today - but we're currently > getting rid of most of the blockers without any new ones appearing. > Today we have landed Ubuntu UI Toolkit staging which, besides many >

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 19.08.14

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > Hi all, > so the blockers are in my bucket > >> >> * Blocking issues: >> >> ** Clock out of sync on resume from suspend >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328646 >> => Merge requests present >> -> Merge ready. Waiting for review. >> > > We ha

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team: TRAINCON-0 is over!

Hey all, IMPORTANT: this promoted image is our branchpoint and branching is ongoing as we speak. MEANING: keep in mind that all things landed in devel now need to go into ubuntu-rtm archive too. An announce with details will follow once we are ready to accept landings for that. Thanks! On Thu,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANNOUNCEMENT: Landing team - RTM landings now officially open!

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak > wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> As we have now officially branched for ubuntu-rtm, we would also like to >> announce that landing for RTM-targetted images is now officia

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANNOUNCEMENT: Landing team - RTM landings now officially open!

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Bill Filler wrote: > On 08/21/2014 03:47 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak >> wrote: >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> As we have now officially branched for ubuntu-rtm, we would also like to >>> announce

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANNOUNCEMENT: Landing team - RTM landings now officially open!

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Pat McGowan wrote: >>> >> >> The idea is to land in utopic first and then copy the source+binaries to >> an rtm silo for retesting; and if the changes actually require a rebuild due >> to the nature of the divergent paths of the archives, push the source >> packag

[Ubuntu-phone] Updates on RTM branch landing details

Hi all, Since we branched off last week there has been a good amount of productive and emotional discussion about the difficulties the ramp up the new RTM landing process puts on landers and landing team. After discussing with the wider team and stakeholders, we identified three key points that w

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Updates on RTM branch landing details

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: >> 1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE >> >> This wasn't clearly an

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Updates on RTM branch landing details

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 07:27 +0200 schrieb Martin Pitt: > >> For the record, "copy-package" from ubuntu-archive-tools can copy a >> source (with our without binaries) from anywhere to anywhere, in >> particular from ubuntu to ub

[Ubuntu-phone] please test your stuff in RTM silo before asking QA sign off

Hi, more than once I saw a failed RTM landing attempt where it turned out that the lander didn't even bother to take the time to test his stuff in RTM silo before asking precious QA folks to spend their time looking at the silo. What some of you did makes us loose precious time that could easily

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] image #275 devel-proposed channel - MAKO

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Sebastian Gomułka wrote: > Hi, > > Is it just me, or in general there is a problem with upgade to image #275 in > the devel-proposed channel? > Can you tell more specifics about this? In particular describe the symptoms you see. Thanks! -- Mailing list: https://

[Ubuntu-phone] DO NOT UPGRADE PHONE & image server taken down temporarily

Hi, while we recover from non booting image incident on our proposed image channels, we have taken the image server temporarily down to avoid further downloads of the broken image. Team is working on recovering from this; once fixed image is available we will bring the system-image server back ag

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] DO NOT UPGRADE PHONE & image server taken down temporarily

om server is up and has the new image. >> >> PS: Sorry to Alexander, I forgot to click "answer all" again :x >> >> 2014-10-11 15:37 GMT+02:00 Alexander Sack : >>> Hi, >>> >>> while we recover from non booting image incident on our propo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] DO NOT UPGRADE PHONE & image server taken down temporarily

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 11, 2014, at 03:48 PM, Vojtech Bocek wrote: > >>I've just removed the broken image (version 82) from my >>s-i.tasemnice.eu server (the one for hammerhead and deb). The same >>thing applies - if you've already downloaded it, don't instal

[Ubuntu-phone] IMAGE FIXED & server back online

Hi all, good news. We pushed a fixed image and brought system-image.ubuntu.com server is back online. This means you can happily upgrade on ubuntu-rtm/proposed to > #99 on krillin and > #83 on mako. Remember that it might take a while until your device sees and has downloaded that new version, s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] vivid landings

Phabulous! This is clearly world record time from release to first image! Well done everybody! Rock on! On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Sebastian Gomułka wrote: > Vivid image #1 booted successfully on mako. > > kr > > /sebastian > > 2014-10-29 22:28 GMT+01:00 Oliver Grawert : >> >> hi, >> >>

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN ubuntu-device-flash changes

Hi, thanks for cleaning and grouping the udf commands up. Will you keep the current cli API available (supported as deprecated) for a while or is that not possible? Thanks! On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > I'll soon be landing a change to ubuntu-device-flash that will ch