[Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Bram Geelen
Hi, some time ago, I saw the beautiful lock screen designs by Lucas Romero Di Bendetto , and yesterday I finished implementing them. I hosted the source over at https://github.com/brambram/QML-Lock . Now, I hope that this would be added to the re

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Zanetti
Hi, we already have some prototype implementation for this [1], started even before the videos appeared on the web. We decided to not focus on this unlocking method right now as the code is either too hard to enter (it takes you ages to input something like 2948) or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
The circular lock should make entering codes easier than the keypad. Either way, it's way better than entering password on a touch keyboard. Thanks Michal On 18 September 2013 13:14, Michael Zanetti wrote: > Hi, > > we already have some prototype implementation for this [1], started even > bef

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Bram Geelen
I didn't make it clear in any of the posts, but the amount of numbers is easily configurable: http://imgur.com/s2DOTDT http://imgur.com/OqoJSff That said, this implementation should not be used as a PIN unlocker. The current solution (with a 123 456 789 0 keypad I believe) is much better suited fo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti wrote: > or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4 is > reasonably fast to enter, but too easy to guess for an attacker). How about to place digits randomly, differently on every unlock ? > Br, > Michael -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 18 September 2013 14:25, Bram Geelen wrote: > I didn't make it clear in any of the posts, but the amount of numbers is > easily configurable: > http://imgur.com/s2DOTDT > http://imgur.com/OqoJSff > > That said, this implementation should not be used as a PIN unlocker. The > current solution (wi

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Zanetti
On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti > > wrote: > > or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4 is > > reasonably fast to enter, but too easy to guess for an attacker). > > How about to place digits randomly, differently on ever

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Zanetti
On Wednesday 18 September 2013 14:07:44 Michal Suchanek wrote: > The circular lock should make entering codes easier than the keypad. Exactly, it should. But it doesn't. It makes it more cumbersome. > > Either way, it's way better than entering password on a touch keyboard. No... the number pad

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Alexander Antimonov
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Michael Zanetti wrote: > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimonov wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti >> >> wrote: >> > or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4 is >> > reasonably fast to enter, but too easy to guess for an attacker

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Zanetti
On Wednesday 18 September 2013 17:20:53 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Michael Zanetti > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti > >> > >> wrote: > >> > or is too insecur

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Bram Geelen
I already put this link in my previous mail, but here it is again: 2013/9/18 Michael Zanetti > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 17:20:53 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Michael Zanetti > > > > wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimon

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Combination lock implementation

2013-09-18 Thread Bram Geelen
I already put this link in my previous mail, but here it is again: https://lh3.ggpht.com/-7enUawUTAt8/UdwAEbtbCxI/J_8/p909d-bYlf8/s1600/unlocscreen03B.png It's by the same designer as the combination lock. My implementation is not suited for tapping behaviour. -- Forwarded message

[Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi! Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework yet! This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to 12.04) so that apps in the appstore don't need to be ported to a new API

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Terry
I'm additionally specifically curious about whether qtdeclarative5-qtaudioengine-plugin can be dropped. This is the QtAudioEngine Qml plugin. It would make the MIR for qtmultimedia much easier. Does anyone actually use QtAudioEngine? No packages in the archive claim to. Here's my proposal to d

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Coordinating landings for changes affecting Touch images

2013-09-18 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Looks like even though I'm logged in with my Canonical account, both > sheets are View Only. So Alexander just told me he'd rather keep the sheet writable only to people running the workflow (I originally thought we'd have anyone able to add there, sorry

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi! > > Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on > ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework > yet! > > This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to > 12.0

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread David Barth
Le 18/09/2013 16:31, Loïc Minier a écrit : [...] Also, do we want multiple frameworks, notably for webapps or for cordova? A quick reply on that question: the 2 packages represent the 2 parts of what an HTML5 app can use locally: the UI toolkit (ubuntu-html5-theme), or the low-level platform ac

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Minimum viable google voice integration

2013-09-18 Thread Zisu Andrei
Common sense tells me it's something that an app would do, much like Skype. But, looking at this page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/SdkFeatureStatus I can't really see it being mentioned. Guys? -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net U

[Ubuntu-phone] Minimum viable google voice integration

2013-09-18 Thread Jorge O. Castro
Hi! I'd like to dogfood ubuntu touch but I am in position where I use my google voice number as my public-facing number. This allows me to screen calls and swap out the real number to other devices, etc. I was thinking that I can switch over if I can just get the phone's caller ID to send out my

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 18 September 2013 09:31, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi! > > Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on > ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework > yet! > > This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to > 12.04) so

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to > 12.04) I guess you mean 14.04 here. > Also, do we want multiple frameworks, notably for webapps or for cordova? We designed click so that it could support multiple

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Defining Click framework(s) for 13.10

2013-09-18 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 09/18/2013 09:31 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi! > > Click packages uploaded to appstore currently declare a dependency on > ubuntu-sdk-13.10, but we haven't defined this ubuntu-sdk-13.10 framework > yet! > > This should be as backwards-compatible as possible (at least up to > 12.04) so tha

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Need picture_files policy in mg app

2013-09-18 Thread Ken VanDine
We are really close to landing enough of the content-hub for you to be able to make that work. To pull pictures from other apps, you would use the content-hub API to get the default peer for pictures, which is gallery-app and provides the UI for picking pictures and returns them back to your app.

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Need picture_files policy in mg app

2013-09-18 Thread Mario Guerriero
I saw the content-hub progresses but I needed that for the contest. No problems anyway as beuno said that he will let the judges know about mine "problem". Regards, Mario — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Ken VanDine wrote: > We are really close to landing en

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Minimum viable google voice integration

2013-09-18 Thread Hoovie
Hi, sorry I don't know much about ubuntu, or if this is the right place for this discussion, but I do know a lot about Google voice, or at least how it works on different clients, and CID masking. As far as I know, you will never get your native # to show a different OUT CID, even if you did, the

[Ubuntu-phone] URL Dispatcher information

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Gould
Hello, Folks have been pushing me (rightfully so) to get a little more user friendly documentation out there about the URL Dispatcher. I went ahead and wrote up this Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/URLDispatcher For those that are looking for the source code for the service it is here: http

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] URL Dispatcher information

2013-09-18 Thread Alexandre Abreu
Hi Ted, thanks for that! It might be a little pedantic, but shouldn't we talk about URI instead of URL? Besides that a few questions: - Is APP_ID going to be used in e.g. the proposed URI application://$(APP_ID).desktop (why specify the ".desktop" btw?), by that I mean w/ the version included?

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] "Can I use the internet?"

2013-09-18 Thread Tony Espy
On 09/17/2013 06:33 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: On 09/12/2013 05:21 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: On 08/01/2013 08:23 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: On 08/01/2013 05:23 AM, Iain Lane wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:42:43PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:18:27PM +0400, Alberto

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] URL Dispatcher information

2013-09-18 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 09/18/2013 01:31 PM, Ted Gould wrote: > Hello, > > Folks have been pushing me (rightfully so) to get a little more user friendly > documentation out there about the URL Dispatcher. I went ahead and wrote up > this Wiki page: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/URLDispatcher > > For those that are lo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Minimum viable google voice integration

2013-09-18 Thread Elias K Gardner
I'm very interested in using google voice on ubuntu touch as well. I also had to disable google hangouts, a move that worries me about the future of google voice. I guess you did know If you’d like to make a call from a different phone > number but want to make your Google Voice number show up on

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Minimum viable google voice integration

2013-09-18 Thread Zisu Andrei
I guess not but should be do-able in a single patch to settings (set the google voice number) and then in telephony. Zisu Andrei On 18 September 2013 23:01, Elias K Gardner wrote: > I'm very interested in using google voice on ubuntu touch as well. I also > had to disable google hangouts, a mo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] URL Dispatcher information

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Gould
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 15:58 -0400, Alexandre Abreu wrote: > It might be a little pedantic, but shouldn't we talk about URI instead > of URL? Yeah, that is a little pendantic :-) Perhaps, but I think for most people they're synonymous. > Besides that a few questions: > > - Is APP_ID going to be

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] URL Dispatcher information

2013-09-18 Thread Ted Gould
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 15:38 -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 09/18/2013 01:31 PM, Ted Gould wrote: > > Folks have been pushing me (rightfully so) to get a little more user > > friendly > > documentation out there about the URL Dispatcher. I went ahead and wrote up > > this Wiki page: > > > >