I already put this link in my previous mail, but here it is again:
2013/9/18 Michael Zanetti <michael.zane...@canonical.com> > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 17:20:53 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Michael Zanetti > > > > <michael.zane...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti > > >> > > >> <michael.zane...@canonical.com> wrote: > > >> > or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4 is > > >> > reasonably fast to enter, but too easy to guess for an attacker). > > >> > > >> How about to place digits randomly, differently on every unlock ? > > > > > > In that case you'll end up rotating the wheel for half a minute before > > > being able to access your phone... > > > > Then, maybe, do not rotate at all, but just tap. Circle with digits > > become just another look for keypad (for those who like it more). > > Yeah, I guess something along those lines will happen at some point. But > as it > doesn't add too much value its not directly in our focus right now. Still, > keep the ideas flowing. > > Br, > Michael > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
