On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimonov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti
> 
> <michael.zane...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4 is
> > reasonably fast to enter, but too easy to guess for an attacker).
> 
> How about to place digits randomly, differently on every unlock ?

In that case you'll end up rotating the wheel for half a minute before being 
able to access your phone...



-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to     : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to