On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:29:39 Alexander Antimonov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Zanetti > > <michael.zane...@canonical.com> wrote: > > or is too insecure (1, 2, 3, 4 is > > reasonably fast to enter, but too easy to guess for an attacker). > > How about to place digits randomly, differently on every unlock ?
In that case you'll end up rotating the wheel for half a minute before being able to access your phone... -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp