Yes
2013/8/4 Vincent Zvikaramba
> It seems as if Ubuntu Edge will need about $1.5 million a day to reach and
> surpass its target. Is this still possible considering the pace has slowed?
>
> Vincent Zvikaramba
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-p
hi,
On Sa, 2013-08-03 at 17:32 +0200, Max Wällstedt wrote:
> Hi!
> When using my flipped port for i9100, I encounter the following error
> whenever I start some applications:
>
>
> D/libEGL ( 3524): loaded /system/lib/egl/libEGL_mali.so
> D/libEGL ( 3524): loaded /system/lib/egl/libGLESv1_CM_ma
On Fr, 2013-08-02 at 20:35 +0200, Max Wällstedt wrote:
> Thanks, that worked, but I also had to unset CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE to
> get the recovery.
heh, that would have been unset automatically when setting
CONFIG_CMDLINE_EXTEND with something like make menuconfig, sorry i didnt
take into account you
I created the mentioned file, rebooted, but now I got these errors, and
screen is still black:
...
I/ServiceManager( 2361): Waiting for service sensorservice...
I/ServiceManager( 1749): Waiting for service SurfaceFlinger...
...
dmesg [1]. logcat [2]
[1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/5947271/
[2] http:/
Thanks, that worked!
Audio seems to be working as well, just at full volume without any ability
to lower the volume.
The camera is also running fine (with a little hassle) and video also
records audio.
2013/8/4 Oliver Grawert
> hi,
> On Sa, 2013-08-03 at 17:32 +0200, Max Wällstedt wrote:
> > Hi
That was indeed the problem, I managed to get adb after a while.
Now with your hack Ubuntu reboots into graphics just fine!
2013/8/4 Oliver Grawert
> On Fr, 2013-08-02 at 20:35 +0200, Max Wällstedt wrote:
> > Thanks, that worked, but I also had to unset CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE to
> > get the recov
hi,
On So, 2013-08-04 at 13:59 +0200, András Mamenyák wrote:
> I created the mentioned file, rebooted, but now I got these errors,
> and screen is still black:
> ...
> I/ServiceManager( 2361): Waiting for service sensorservice...
> I/ServiceManager( 1749): Waiting for service SurfaceFlinger...
> ..
Not with the current perks.Gabriel Salles wrote:>Yes>>>2013/8/4 Vincent Zvikaramba >>> It seems as if Ubuntu Edge will need about $1.5 million a day to reach and>> surpass its target. Is this still possible considering the pace has slowed? Vincent Zvikaramba Sent from my Windows Phone
And what about my earlier dmesg without the patch? There were no errors
like this.
So, again, without the patch: [1][2]
With patch: [3][4]
Also:
root@ubuntu-phablet:/# ls /dev/disk/by-name/
BOOT BOTA0 BOTA1 CACHE EFS PARAM RADIO RECOVERY SYSTEM
root@ubuntu-phablet:/# ls /dev/disk/by-part
On So, 2013-08-04 at 16:40 +0200, András Mamenyák wrote:
> And what about my earlier dmesg without the patch? There were no
> errors like this.
>
>
> So, again, without the patch: [1][2]
> With patch: [3][4]
>
>
the kernel cmdline is identical in all your dmesg outputs ... and it
looks pretty w
My modification:
-CONFIG_CMDLINE="console=ttySAC2,115200"
+CONFIG_CMDLINE="console=tty1"
CONFIG_CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER=y
-# CONFIG_CMDLINE_EXTEND is not set
-# CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE is not set
+CONFIG_CMDLINE_EXTEND=y
+CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE=y
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote
I'm arguing here that Canonical made a mistake by shunning the Edge as a
phone-only device to begin the Ubuntu-Touch experience with.
Further, I think it is unwise on Canonical's part to "Abandon" the
Edge as a Phone if the Indiegogo campaign for Edge-as-Convergence-Device is
unsuccessful. Cano
hi,
On So, 2013-08-04 at 17:23 +0200, András Mamenyák wrote:
> My modification:
...
>
> CONFIG_CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER=y
> CONFIG_CMDLINE_EXTEND=y
> CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE=y
>
only one of these three can be set at a time ...
seriously, use one of the tools the kernel ships instead of hacking the
c
You seem to have missed the point entirely. If you want an Ubuntu Phone,
then there are phones already available on the market. Supported models
now, are LG Nexux 4 and Samsung Nexus Galaxy. But there are many more
unofficial ports.
The reason for the Ubuntu Edge was never to win the market or any
I am so sorry, I really had no clue. Thank you for still trying to help me.
>From now on I am now using make menuconfig to adjust the config.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> On So, 2013-08-04 at 17:23 +0200, András Mamenyák wrote:
> > My modification:
> ...
> >
> >
I didn't miss the point (Canonical is making an erroneous assumption about the
market--let me explain). I am aware of all the Ubuntu "supported models"
available on the market. But frankly, I don't like any of them.
The Edge design is unlike any of the Android phones (AKA supported models) on
No, you missed the point entirely. This is a "halo device." Whether it
sells a single one is entirely irrelevant. Its purpose is not to sell in
large quantities, and it isn't meant for people who are short on cash. This
is a device meant for people who want the very best and have the money to
get i
Okay, now I think I got it right, but still, it sits on samsung logo.
Sorry if I screwed up again.
Is it ok BTW that menuconfig changes some other stuff in my defconfig file
when I only edited the cmdline option?
[1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/5948192/
[2] http://paste.ubuntu.com/5948193/
On Sun, A
My apologies for any "insult" you gleaned from my email. I don't think FOSS
users are poor nor did I in any way mean to say that people use FOSS because
they can't afford a proprietary option. I don't believe this at all and regret
that you came to this idea from what I wrote. My reference was t
I haven't read anything insulting from your mails. :)
I can understand your point of view, but any "low-spec" phone that
Canonical could push would still be a lot more expensive than anything
comparable that's already on the market. So if price is an issue, then it's
unlikely that the Edge would b
Thanks :)
Canonical's influence on the Edge resulted in a great looking/sized/arranged
phone. Hopefully Canonical will exert influence in a Huawei designed phone. I'm
just reading a lot that makes it sound like Canonical will not bother with
hardware design at all unless the Edge succeeds. Yet
On 4 August 2013 23:13, Greg W wrote:
> Thanks :)
>
> Canonical's influence on the Edge resulted in a great
> looking/sized/arranged phone. Hopefully Canonical will exert influence in a
> Huawei designed phone. I'm just reading a lot that makes it sound like
> Canonical will not bother with hardw
Yes, I agree with you on all points :)
From: joerlend.schins...@ubuntu.com
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 23:17:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Ubuntu Edge (constructive criticism/advice on
Canonical's approach)
To: mttbrns...@outlook.com
CC: joerlend.schins...@ubuntu.com; ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpa
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Greg W wrote:
> I'm really impressed with the Canonical influenced design of the Edge. And
> it's because I'm so impressed that it's disappointing to me that the Edge
> will "die" if the campaign fails. It seems like a great design would be
> going to waste. Everyt
"I have never learned anything from any man who agreed with me,".. Dudley Field
Malone (1882-1950)
I personally do not think Edge will succeed in raising more than 20Million (but
I really hope I am wrong), I will of course be disappointed like everyone else,
but the world will not end.
BUT I wo
main problems with the cius:
"unremarkable and overpriced"
http://www.pcworld.com/article/256307/r_i_p_cisco_cius_another_tablet_bites_the_dust.html
In comparison Canonical addressed most of
that:http://iloveubuntu.net/pictures_me/ubuntu%20edge%20comparison%20.png
Anyway they haven't given up:h
I tried out the port on my device (T-Mobile version). I was able to get it
to run without doing anything special. I did find some interesting stuff.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6WIIp8JmreZV1VnbWpGLWEzMmc/edit?usp=sharing
When I first saw this I thought the app was not stretching properly but
t
27 matches
Mail list logo
