On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Jamie Strandboge
wrote:
I can say that the upcoming storage framework specification deals
with (vastly)
improving sharing as well.
Is this specification available somewhere for public comment? I've
been frustrated by the content hub many times, so I'd like
On 09/21/2015 08:38 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 10:57 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 18:40 +0300 schrieb Roman Shchekin:
>>> Hello guys!
>>>
>>>
> that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the
>>> implementation has to be improved
>
On 09/18/2015 10:57 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 18:40 +0300 schrieb Roman Shchekin:
>> Hello guys!
>>
>>
that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the
>> implementation has to be improved
>> But for now it's near to unusable (in my opinion). I've
+1 for hard links
> On 21 Sep 2015, at 17:38, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>
> On 09/18/2015 10:57 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 18:40 +0300 schrieb Roman Shchekin:
>>> Hello guys!
>>>
>>>
> that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the
>>> imple
Hello guys!
>> that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the implementation has
to be improved
But for now it's near to unusable (in my opinion). I've developed cloud
storage service client (called YaD) and it's pain. Really.
Why did you choose so strong limitations? I don't know any m
hi,
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 18:40 +0300 schrieb Roman Shchekin:
> Hello guys!
>
>
> >> that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the
> implementation has to be improved
> But for now it's near to unusable (in my opinion). I've developed
> cloud storage service client (called YaD)
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 13:48 +0200 schrieb Jelmer Prins:
> If you have a file that is 500mb
> And you open it in 3 apps
> it will be in 4 locations, taking up 2gb
> and on a phone 2gb is a lot
>
that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the implementation
has to be improved
On 2015-09-17 19:46 , Oliver Grawert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 13:36 +0200 schrieb Jelmer Prins:
>> It doesn’t change the fact that when you have a document in de documents
>> folder and you pen it with an app it is copied to the local files of the app
>> instead of editing that fil
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 13:36 +0200 schrieb Jelmer Prins:
> It doesn’t change the fact that when you have a document in de documents
> folder and you pen it with an app it is copied to the local files of the app
> instead of editing that file on its current location.
> Or has that been fix
It doesn’t change the fact that when you have a document in de documents folder
and you pen it with an app it is copied to the local files of the app instead
of editing that file on its current location.
Or has that been fixed already ?
greetz
carakas
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 13:14, Oliver Grawert
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 13:05 +0200 schrieb chg 1:
> I'd like to have some documents (in PDF, txt...) with keys and private
> things.
> If I open them with Document Viewer, PdfjsViewer, edit... then they
> appear in diferent places and I fear they could be read by someone who
> reached t
I'd like to have some documents (in PDF, txt...) with keys and private things.
If I open them with Document Viewer, PdfjsViewer, edit... then they appear in
diferent places and I fear they could be read by someone who reached the phone
or even through the net.
I'd agnodelge if someone could say s
12 matches
Mail list logo
