On 09/18/2015 10:57 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > > Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 18:40 +0300 schrieb Roman Shchekin: >> Hello guys! >> >> >>>> that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the >> implementation has to be improved >> But for now it's near to unusable (in my opinion). I've developed >> cloud storage service client (called YaD) and it's pain. Really. >> >> >> Why did you choose so strong limitations? I don't know any mobile OS >> with so strong restrictions. And why did you do that before actual >> implementaion of "plenty of ways to achieve this"? >> > > no idea why it was done this way, I can just point to the security team > again, but I belive IOS does it in a similar way ... as I said, snappy > fixes that issue, as soon as the phone switches to a snappy base on teh > way to 16.04 you get such stuff for free. > The security team didn't dictate the implementation-- we said apps need to be isolated and that sharing should be possible via user interaction. The sharing mechanism currently does copies aiui via content-hub. It could do, for example, hard links. Ken Vandine (in CC) might be able to comment further on this point. I can say that the upcoming storage framework specification deals with (vastly) improving sharing as well.
As for snappy fixing things-- well, content-hub could in theory do the same thing today on Touch (and it will have to be updated for snappy). -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
