On 09/21/2015 08:38 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 09/18/2015 10:57 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> hi, >> >> Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 18:40 +0300 schrieb Roman Shchekin: >>> Hello guys! >>> >>> >>>>> that doesnt mean the feature itself is bad, but that the >>> implementation has to be improved >>> But for now it's near to unusable (in my opinion). I've developed >>> cloud storage service client (called YaD) and it's pain. Really. >>> >>> >>> Why did you choose so strong limitations? I don't know any mobile OS >>> with so strong restrictions. And why did you do that before actual >>> implementaion of "plenty of ways to achieve this"? >>> >> >> no idea why it was done this way, I can just point to the security team >> again, but I belive IOS does it in a similar way ... as I said, snappy >> fixes that issue, as soon as the phone switches to a snappy base on teh >> way to 16.04 you get such stuff for free. >> > The security team didn't dictate the implementation-- we said apps need to be > isolated and that sharing should be possible via user interaction. The sharing > mechanism currently does copies aiui via content-hub. It could do, for > example, > hard links. Ken Vandine (in CC) might be able to comment further on this > point. > I can say that the upcoming storage framework specification deals with > (vastly) > improving sharing as well. > It could also be done via fd delegation (for a temporary elevation of privileges) or using delegation to extending the security profile associated with the application.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
