On 12/17/2013 04:31 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 17.12.2013 10:13, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>> Were there some discussion or does anyone have thoughts about:
>>
>> - Where we expect binaries or modules (for both QML and HTML5 apps)
>>to live, for a case of multiple architectures in
Hello,
On 17.12.2013 11:31, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 10:13, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>> Were there some discussion or does anyone have thoughts about:
>>
>> - Where we expect binaries or modules (for both QML and HTML5 apps)
>>to live, for a case of multiple architectures in one cli
Hello,
On 17.12.2013 10:13, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Were there some discussion or does anyone have thoughts about:
>
> - Where we expect binaries or modules (for both QML and HTML5 apps)
>to live, for a case of multiple architectures in one click?
> - How apparmor (and friends) will deal wi
Hey!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> - Where we expect binaries or modules (for both QML and HTML5 apps)
>to live, for a case of multiple architectures in one click?
I would like to propose we apply similar namings to the multiarch-ed
directories in / and /usr for Click wit
Hello everybody,
Dimitri just announced his great work surrounding cross-compiling apps
with the cmake [1]. With that out of the way and chroot management
support having landed in click [2], we're a lot closer to offering "fat
packages" to our app development community.
Zoltán is currently workin
5 matches
Mail list logo