Hello, On 17.12.2013 11:31, Daniel Holbach wrote: > On 17.12.2013 10:13, Daniel Holbach wrote: >> Were there some discussion or does anyone have thoughts about: >> >> - Where we expect binaries or modules (for both QML and HTML5 apps) >> to live, for a case of multiple architectures in one click? >> - How apparmor (and friends) will deal with this? >> - Which impact it's going to have on Unity and upstart-app-launch? >> - Which changes will have to be made for our development tools? >> - Which review tests we want to implement? >> - <Your other open questions here.> > > Colin pointed out that we already had a discussion about this on the > ubuntu-appstore-developers list and he was right. > > [1] has a lot of the details and it seems like with [2] Ted is working > on getting the upstart-app-launch bits resolved. > > Are there any other outstanding work items regarding this work? Do the > apparmor tools need tweaks? How about Unity? The SDK? > > Is this also going to work for Cordova plugins? > > [1] https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-appstore-developers/msg00703.html > [2] > https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/tracking-arch/+merge/196194
Does anyone have a project which already uses cmake to install binaries and modules all into the right directories (as specified in https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-appstore-developers/msg00703.html)? It'd be great if we could have a look at this together and figure out implementation issues together. Thanks a bunch in advance. Have a great day, Daniel -- Get involved in Ubuntu development! http://packaging.ubuntu.com Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/G+ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
