On 12/17/2013 04:31 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello, > > On 17.12.2013 10:13, Daniel Holbach wrote: >> Were there some discussion or does anyone have thoughts about: >> >> - Where we expect binaries or modules (for both QML and HTML5 apps) >> to live, for a case of multiple architectures in one click? >> - How apparmor (and friends) will deal with this? >> - Which impact it's going to have on Unity and upstart-app-launch? >> - Which changes will have to be made for our development tools? >> - Which review tests we want to implement? >> - <Your other open questions here.> > > Colin pointed out that we already had a discussion about this on the > ubuntu-appstore-developers list and he was right. > > [1] has a lot of the details and it seems like with [2] Ted is working > on getting the upstart-app-launch bits resolved. > > Are there any other outstanding work items regarding this work? Do the > apparmor tools need tweaks? How about Unity? The SDK? > The apparmor policy already allows for loading libraries under the install directory, so there should be no adjustments needed for policy. aa-exec-click needs to follow upstart-app-launch for updating LD_LIBRARY_PATH and QML2_IMPORT_PATH, but I'm not sure how to do that yet. upstart-app-launch uses dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_MULTIARCH to generate the triplet during the build, but I need to determine the triplet at runtime because click-apparmor is 'Architecture: all' (and therefore I can't set it during the build), and I'm not sure yet how to properly find the triplet at runtime on the readonly image yet. Suggestions welcome-- I just don't want to repeat the logic in dpkg-architecture if I don't have to.
-- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
