Hi,
( I know this can be made into a bug report. )
On 13.04 64bit with Adobe Flash installed.
Go to youtube.com, play any video, right-click and select "Settings..."
Then a dialog pops up, but it doesn't respond to user click at all;
the only way to "close" it is refresh the page...
I know Adob
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ( I know this can be made into a bug report. )
>
> On 13.04 64bit with Adobe Flash installed.
>
> Go to youtube.com, play any video, right-click and select "Settings..."
> Then a dialog pops up, but it doesn't respond to user click at al
Hello,
I put some time and effort creating this, please read at the very least
introduction and suggestions.
= Introduction =
I am a maintaining the Ubuntu deployment in Tieto company. We have over
500 Ubuntu desktops. I am also trying to gather the Ubuntu Enterprise
community (see https://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Kerensa wrote on 20/05/13 18:02:
>
> On May 20, 2013 8:10 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" >
>> For all the general users I install Ubuntu for (including
>> servers), it's an utter waste of bandwidth for everyone,
>> particularly when automatically ch
I propose we either disable source downloading by default at release
time, but I conclude that developers generally don't care about this
extra overhead (as we have a good setup).
If really we can't see this from a user PoV, I'm happy to start a user
discussion and see how users feel...?
--
Ubun
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>
> On 13.04 64bit with Adobe Flash installed.
>
> Go to youtube.com, play any video, right-click and select "Settings..."
> Then a dialog pops up, but it doesn't respond to user click at all;
> the only way to "close" it is refresh the page...
>
Am Dienstag, den 21.05.2013, 04:30 -0500 schrieb Jordon Bedwell:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ( I know this can be made into a bug report. )
> >
> > On 13.04 64bit with Adobe Flash installed.
> >
> > Go to youtube.com, play any video, right-click and select
(with my personal hat on)
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:48:47PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think that's legally sufficient, but not in the spirit of free software.
I agree that it's legally sufficient.
I also agree that making the sources easily available for download is
part of the essentia
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ( I know this can be made into a bug report. )
> >
> > On 13.04 64bit with Adobe Flash installed.
> >
> > Go to youtube.com, play any video, right-click and select "Settings
Robie Basak [2013-05-21 13:55 +0100]:
> Why don't we talk about ways to make it just as easy, but without the
> requirement that indexes are downloaded locally even when they are not
> being used?
pull-lp-source and pull-debian-source are about as easy as it can be
IMHO, and offer a lot more funct
I'm pretty sure the default encryption is relative week is because the
packages are distributed internationally. Cryptographic software is
consider a munition and subject to ITAR regulation. Many countries restrict
what can be imported and/or used within the country.
I think the most common soluti
Grr - "weak", not "week". Why do I never remember that I should never write
email until I've been awake for at least two hours?!
Embarassingly,
Bear
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Bear Giles wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the default encryption is relative week is because the
> packages are distri
On 21 May 2013 13:55, Robie Basak wrote:
> What if we provided a reasonable message if no deb-src lines are
> defined, with a single simple command to add them and run "apt-get
> update" for you?
I don't think it would even need that - software-properties (Software
& Updates) already has the nece
Am Dienstag, den 21.05.2013, 18:02 +0800 schrieb Daniel J Blueman:
> I propose we either disable source downloading by default at release
> time, but I conclude that developers generally don't care about this
> extra overhead (as we have a good setup).
>
> If really we can't see this from a user
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:04:20PM +0100, J Fernyhough wrote:
> On 21 May 2013 13:55, Robie Basak wrote:
> > What if we provided a reasonable message if no deb-src lines are
> > defined, with a single simple command to add them and run "apt-get
> > update" for you?
>
> I don't think it would even
Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2013, 15:54 -0400 schrieb Felix Miata:
> On 2013-05-16 21:27 (GMT+0200) Thomas Prost composed:
>
> > Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> >> Thomas Prost wrote:
>
> >> > So the question is: What must I do to carry on, seeing all what the
> >> > machine is doing - instead of that nice
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:02:36PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> I propose we either disable source downloading by default at release
> time, but I conclude that developers generally don't care about this
> extra overhead (as we have a good setup).
>
> If really we can't see this from a user Po
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Dale Amon wrote:
> Source is an educational tool.
> Learning command line is a lesson in taking control of your own computer.
> Kids explore.
>
> Make sure J Random's computer is full of things to intrigue and
> lead a 13 year old to the power of the source.
Perso
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:22:50PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:04:20PM +0100, J Fernyhough wrote:
> > On 21 May 2013 13:55, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > What if we provided a reasonable message if no deb-src lines are
> > > defined, with a single simple command to add them a
Am Dienstag, den 21.05.2013, 09:31 -0700 schrieb Dylan McCall:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Dale Amon wrote:
> > Source is an educational tool.
> > Learning command line is a lesson in taking control of your own computer.
> > Kids explore.
> >
> > Make sure J Random's computer is full of thi
On 05/21/2013 04:53 AM, ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com wrote:
Hopefully, the SSL bug in LDAP libraries is now gone (Bug #423252), so
the first 2 can be used productively on desktops and/or servers. Note
that cached credentials (with nss-updatedb and pam-ccreds) are not
officially
Hi,
I'm kind of late to this thread, but I'd like to add my opinion.
Personally, I think we have to many entries in sources.list.
Anyone suggesting that there is little cost to entries simply hasn't
tested things. There is a very real cost to having unused entries,
in bandwidth, load on a proxy
We use nsscache for caching, but this package is also from
universe...except my company wrote and maintains it, so I'm OK with it
being in universe ;)
-A
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 04:53 AM,
> ubuntu-devel-discuss-request@**lists.ubuntu.comwrote:
>
>>
On 21.05.2013 12:37, Bolesław Tokarski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I put some time and effort creating this, please read at the very least
> introduction and suggestions.
Thanks, this was quite a detailed post and brings back memories :)
> We are using SSSD with some success now. Thanks to Timo Aaltonen
Am Mon, 20 May 2013 10:02:41 -0700
schrieb Benjamin Kerensa :
> I think in most parts of the world 4MB is trivial overhead for a user.
Over here in German cheap mobile data tarrifs often get you something
like a few hundered MByte/month.
In some rural areas it's hard to get better than 64k/s if
25 matches
Mail list logo
