-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew schrieb:
> One idea for a session I'd like to see, maybe along with some new
> documentation added to the wiki, would be something on the new dh auto
> stuff added with debhelper 7.
Sounds like a good idea. I noted this down.
Have a great day,
(``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Olá Matthew e a todos.
>
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 09:54:05 Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
>
>> The Design team has just discussed this and we agree it's confusing. The
>> two-monitors icon sucked, but our first try at a replacement wasn't so
>> hot. :-) We will hav
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mat Tomaszewski wrote on 07/03/09 13:17:
>
>> Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
>>
>>> I totally agree that it's confusing
>>>
>> Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used
>> to? I know it
Olá Mat e a todos.
On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
> That's an interesting feedback, thanks. However, I would not treat Linux
> Class students as representative for the population of all potential
> Ubuntu users :)
Most of them are brand new users, using a GNU/Linux dis
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:24 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
...
> On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
...
> > The request to change the icon came originally from various OEMs we
> > cooperate with
>
> So OEMs now count more then Community?
> Thanks, that was exactly what
Mat Tomaszewski [2009-03-16 10:02 +]:
> OS X shows "0 signal" icon for both no signal and disconnected. Not sure
> what I've missed?
Even if that is really so, I really don't think that we ought to copy
such confusions from OS X,
I had a quick look at OS X in 2004, and it definitively did *
On Monday 16 March 2009 2:13:34 am Null Ack wrote:
> Gday folks :)
>
> There is difference between what I foresee as sensible security
> defaults for our desktop build against what is being currently
> delivered. It may very well be that there is aspects to the current
> setup that I am not fully
>
> backed up by their studies (not available for public,
> unfortunately). We'll now be very closely looking at all feedback we're
> getting for the new icon. I encourage everyone to keep their eyes open,
> too :)
>
Personally, a survey that nobody has access to from a 3rd party who is
initiating
I agree that using the zero signal icon for "no connection" is really confusing.
Is there some easy way to revert this on my system?
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modi
Hello Matthew,
> As a couple of small corrections to this, it's not a metaphor, and it's
> not what OS X does.
>
> The Design team has just discussed this and we agree it's confusing. The
> two-monitors icon sucked, but our first try at a replacement wasn't so
> hot. :-) We will have another go,
2009/3/16 Mackenzie Morgan :
> Oh, and um...ufw enabled *for IPv6* as well.
If not already done, depends on a separate blueprint for enabling ufw
with a default deny policy.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://li
On 16/03/2009 Martin Soto wrote:
> Canonical's design team
> is definitely paying attention to us (as we can see from their active
> participation in this list) but they are aren't making their decisions
> solely based on our input, which, in my opinion, is also the right
> thing
> for them to do.
Hi,
I was thinking of making a package that depends on privoxy and tor being
installed, and basically sets up a version of privoxy that forwards
everything through tor.
I won't need any binaries; I'm thinking of making both privoxy and tor
prerequisites, so that all I need to do is supply config
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 02:13:24PM +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Olá Michael e a todos.
>
> On Friday 13 March 2009 18:19:28 Michael Vogt wrote:
> > during the last UDS we talked informally about using the "aufs"
> > overlay filesystem layer for release upgrade testing. I build a
> > prot
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 02:27:16AM -0400, John Vivirito wrote:
> On 03/14/2009 10:13 AM, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> > Olá Michael e a todos.
[..]
> > This idea seems like a really nice idea, and one that in some other form is
> > requested by users/testers.
> > I would like to add to points:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:51:52AM +0100, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> When doing something like this one should be careful because here you
> have a copy of all files that are modified during the upgrade.
> Applications keeping these files open will write to the old copies, and
> applications whic
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:33:20PM +0100, surfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>2009/3/12 Travis
>
> However, that page also doesn't give much hint on how to proceed.
>
>See:
>
> [1]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Packaging%20it%20yourself
Thanks! I have uploaded th
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Mat Tomaszewski [2009-03-16 10:02 +]:
>
>> OS X shows "0 signal" icon for both no signal and disconnected. Not sure
>> what I've missed?
>>
>
> Even if that is really so, I really don't think that we ought to copy
> such confusions from OS X,
>
Absolutely, hen
Martin Soto wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:24 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> ...
>
>> On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
>>
> ...
>
>>> The request to change the icon came originally from various OEMs we
>>> cooperate with
>>>
>> So OEMs now count
(``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Olá Mat e a todos.
>
> On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
>
>> That's an interesting feedback, thanks. However, I would not treat Linux
>> Class students as representative for the population of all potential
>> Ubuntu users :)
>>
>
> M
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:59 + Mat Tomaszewski
wrote:
>I hope by saying *we* you mean *you*, or maybe other community members
>have already chosen their representative to speak for them? :)
>
Even with the smiley I think this kind of response discourages constrcutive
dialogue and is not in
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:59 + Mat Tomaszewski
> wrote:
>
>> I hope by saying *we* you mean *you*, or maybe other community members
>> have already chosen their representative to speak for them? :)
>>
>>
>
> Even with the smiley I think this kind of response
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:59 +
Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
> (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> > Olá Mat e a todos.
> >
> > On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
> >
> >> That's an interesting feedback, thanks. However, I would not treat
> >> Linux Class students as representati
Hello,
I have updated the tth package for inclusion in jaunty, and attempted
to remedy the various problems with it that were found by REVU.
However, I am a bit at a loss about what to do regarding the two
remaining lintian warnings:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/tth-0903162054/linti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mat Tomaszewski wrote on 16/03/09 10:02:
>
> Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
>...
>> and it's not what OS X does.
>
> OS X shows "0 signal" icon for both no signal and disconnected. Not
> sure what I've missed?
>...
Yes, but Bugabundo's original complain
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:28:46 + Mat Tomaszewski
wrote:
>Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:59 + Mat Tomaszewski
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I hope by saying *we* you mean *you*, or maybe other community members
>>> have already chosen their representative to speak for them? :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dylan McCall wrote on 15/03/09 02:59:
>...
> Here a screenshot:
> http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/3484/keyboardlayoutnotificia.jpg
>
> Is it on the right track? Suggestions, etc. would be great :)
>...
Nice idea!
You could probably use both title a
27 matches
Mail list logo
