Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread Arwyn Hainsworth
Hello, There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I would like to do it 'right'. I have outlined my basic ideas and proposals in the following S

Re: Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Quoting Arwyn Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones > currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a > result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I > would like to do it 'right'. > > I

Re: Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread Forest Bond
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:35:23AM +, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Quoting Arwyn Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://oss.gonicus.de/project/?group_id=6 > The spec says "robust" and "extensible"; I'd say PHP is pretty much ruled out. Also, I'm not sure if Arwyn is interested in writing a

Re: Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread Arwyn Hainsworth
On 16/01/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:35:23AM +, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > > Quoting Arwyn Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > http://oss.gonicus.de/project/?group_id=6 > > > > The spec says "robust" and "extensible"; I'd say PHP is pretty much ruled

Re: Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 18:43 +0900 schrieb Arwyn Hainsworth: > Hello, > > There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones > currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a > result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I > would like to

Re: Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread George Farris
On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 17:44 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 18:43 +0900 schrieb Arwyn Hainsworth: > > Hello, > > > > There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones > > currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a > > result I'

Re: Remote Admin Server Spec. Request for discussion.

2007-01-16 Thread Jan Claeys
Op dinsdag 16-01-2007 om 18:43 uur [tijdzone +0900], schreef Arwyn Hainsworth: > There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones > currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a > result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I > would like to

Re: FAT32 marked as dirty flag - dosfsck

2007-01-16 Thread Onno Benschop
On 09/01/07 08:30, Onno Benschop wrote: > A number of current bugs[1] exist related to dosfsck within Ubuntu. > Stefan Potyra[2] and I[3] have been working through issues that are > causing file corruption and deadlocks on some FAT32 partitions with > some files. > Did this message actually arrive

Re: FAT32 marked as dirty flag - dosfsck

2007-01-16 Thread Daniel Robitaille
On 1/16/07, Onno Benschop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09/01/07 08:30, Onno Benschop wrote: > > A number of current bugs[1] exist related to dosfsck within Ubuntu. > > Stefan Potyra[2] and I[3] have been working through issues that are > > causing file corruption and deadlocks on some FAT32 part