Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-07-07 Thread John Vivirito
On 07/06/2009 06:15 PM, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote: > Olá Mackenzie e a todos. > > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 22:33:07 Mackenzie Morgan wrote: >> I don't actually know anybody that used OOo on Windows before they used it >> on Linux. > > I did, and I've set *many* windows users to use OOo, even i

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-07-06 Thread (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo
Olá Mackenzie e a todos. On Tuesday 16 June 2009 22:33:07 Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > I don't actually know anybody that used OOo on Windows before they used it on > Linux. I did, and I've set *many* windows users to use OOo, even if they never run linux in their lives! -- Hi, I'm BUGabundo, an

UDS Remote Participation (Was Re: about empathy as the default IM application)

2009-06-19 Thread Andrew SB
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Andrew Sayers wrote: > I'll try to listen in during the next UDS, but it looks like there > aren't many archives kept around for those of us that want to go in and > see what happened in the past.  Is it worth asking Canonical to archive > the IRC logs next time, an

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-19 Thread Andrew Sayers
Thanks for these links. Now you remind me, I do remember a flurry of activity in August, which I'd put out of my mind when it didn't get any traction. I'll try to listen in during the next UDS, but it looks like there aren't many archives kept around for those of us that want to go in and see

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-19 Thread Andrew Sayers
Peteris Krisjanis wrote: > > I like this idea. This could be not only limited to Pidgin, but other > software, like Xchat, for example. > > Go ahead, create blueprint for this. > With apologies for the delay, please see: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/install-programs-from-

Re: Browser chat (was Re: about empathy as the default IM application)

2009-06-19 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Danny Piccirillo wrote on 17/06/09 21:13: >... > What would Midori need to replace Firefox? It has plugin support, so > let's forget about the number of actual plugins (similar to Empathy > vs Pidgin, it would be unreasonable to expect that gap to clos

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-19 Thread Martin Pitt
Danny Piccirillo [2009-06-19 4:31 -0400]: > It seems ubuntu-desktop recommends Empathy but still only includes Pidgin, > so it is not actually included in Karmic yet. Who can fix this? We need to > iron out as many bugs as possible! The CDs didn't build because of missing dependencies, see http:

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-19 Thread Danny Piccirillo
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 20:14, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:46, Martin Pitt wrote: > >> Danny Piccirillo [2009-06-17 2:22 -0400]: >> > I'm noticing that in the latest daily build of Ubuntu, Pidgin in still >> > included, who makes the actual change and when will that hap

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-18 Thread Danny Piccirillo
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:46, Martin Pitt wrote: > Danny Piccirillo [2009-06-17 2:22 -0400]: > > I'm noticing that in the latest daily build of Ubuntu, Pidgin in still > > included, who makes the actual change and when will that happen? > > I went through the MIRs last week, and changed the see

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-18 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 14.40 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto: > > Daniel would know better, but based on what he's explained: I'd guess > Empathy > would deal better with audio than Skype would simply because Empathy > doesn't > try to abuse the ALSA API or do silly things to /proc li

Re: Browser chat (was Re: about empathy as the default IM application)

2009-06-17 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 4:56:16 pm Evan R. Murphy wrote: > not sure I fully understand the rendering issue (could > someone elaborate on that, please?), Webkit has, I believe, the fastest Javascript engine. It also has better CSS2 & CSS3 support than other rendering engines (along with a few

Re: Browser chat (was Re: about empathy as the default IM application)

2009-06-17 Thread Evan R. Murphy
2009/6/17 Danny Piccirillo : > Wow, yeah that was a long time ago...definitely grab the newest version > using the WebKit and Midori PPAs. It's really great and it's GNOME too. I > find it to be much faster and sleeker than Epiphany, and seems to have more > features. IMHO, it's just designed bette

Re: Browser chat (was Re: about empathy as the default IM application)

2009-06-17 Thread Danny Piccirillo
Wow, yeah that was a long time ago...definitely grab the newest version using the WebKit and Midori PPAs. It's really great and it's GNOME too. I find it to be much faster and sleeker than Epiphany, and seems to have more features. IMHO, it's just designed better. It is certainly not ready to take

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
> Hi Dan, > > About halfway through this reply, a compromise occurred to me: get > migration-assistant to install Pidgin if it's detected.  If that works, > it would get rid of many of the issues I've been complaining about, at > least for migraters that plan to dual boot.  This post covers some >

Browser chat (was Re: about empathy as the default IM application)

2009-06-17 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 3:31:09 pm Danny Piccirillo wrote: > What about Midori instead of Epiphany? I have yet to see a chart comparing > the two, but from what i've read, Midori is much better, and i've been using > it as my main browser for a while now. I've only used the Hardy version...that

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Danny Piccirillo
What about Midori instead of Epiphany? I have yet to see a chart comparing the two, but from what i've read, Midori is much better, and i've been using it as my main browser for a while now. On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 14:44, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 2:27:31 pm Vincenzo Ci

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Andrew SB
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Sayers wrote: > I've not been able to find any discussion of Empathy online before this > week, and I can't find it in the schedules or the list of discussions. > Could you point to somewhere that the arguments are laid out? > >        - Andrew It can be har

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Andrew Sayers
As promised, this reply will concentrate on working around problems faced by migraters by patching migration-assistant. I would be willing to put programming time into the ideas suggested here. As I stated in another post, the best Linux migration strategy involves two stages: new apps/same OS

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Andrew Sayers
Hi Dan, About halfway through this reply, a compromise occurred to me: get migration-assistant to install Pidgin if it's detected. If that works, it would get rid of many of the issues I've been complaining about, at least for migraters that plan to dual boot. This post covers some underlyin

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 2:27:31 pm Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 14.01 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis ha > scritto: > > What I meant that Empathy, maybe not complete now, but it is the way > > to go, it fits more in scheme of things for Ubuntu and GNOME. > > The same could

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Danny Piccirillo
www.ThePoint.com ? www.COfundOS.org ? Both are good for this On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 14:25, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 08.29 -0700, George Farris ha scritto: > > > > > > I agree and use OTR all the time, however, if more people start using > > Empathy then hopefull

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 2:30:20 pm Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 13.16 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto: > > > > > > Nevermind the fact that Empathy replacing Pidgin eventually was > > discussed at > > UDS *Jaunty* 6 months ago with a "let's aim for Jaunty+1" outco

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 13.16 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto: > > > Nevermind the fact that Empathy replacing Pidgin eventually was > discussed at > UDS *Jaunty* 6 months ago with a "let's aim for Jaunty+1" outcome and > then re- > discussed at UDS Karmic. There's been 6 months to ge

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 14.01 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis ha scritto: > What I meant that Empathy, maybe not complete now, but it is the way > to go, it fits more in scheme of things for Ubuntu and GNOME. The same could be said about epiphany, yet firefox is the default browser. V. -- Ubu

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno mer, 17/06/2009 alle 08.29 -0700, George Farris ha scritto: > > > I agree and use OTR all the time, however, if more people start using > Empathy then hopefully an OTR plugin will be ported sooner rather than > later. > Yes I agree. Another option would be for Canonical or Gnome to fi

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 11:39:22 am dan wrote: > Regarding UDS, and the decisions made there, I dont see how those sessions > could be any more inclusive. There is news and blogs and information > flowing out of there almost 24x7 for a week. The session schedules are > published. And there are

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread dan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Andrew Sayers < andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote: > I guess my previous message wasn't clear - I'm not making an argument > here from personal preference, I'm trying to file a bug in Ubuntu > itself. Specifically, that dropping Pidgin will cause a regres

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread George Farris
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:18 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > On 16/06/2009 Ken VanDine wrote: > > If > > you really need OTR, you can install pidgin. > > All the users I've shown OTR to agreed it's an extremely good thing to > have. You can not know if your boss is watching you. Cryptography tool

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On 16/06/2009 Ken VanDine wrote: > If > you really need OTR, you can install pidgin. All the users I've shown OTR to agreed it's an extremely good thing to have. You can not know if your boss is watching you. Cryptography tools available for the masses in an easy way is another way to distinguis

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On 16/06/2009 Alexander H Deriziotis wrote: > > > This would be a pretty bad move regarding Ubuntu's development model. > With a 6-month release cycle, things need to remain cutting edge. If > every release is just going to be a rehash of a previous one, then > Canonical should be releasing a

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
What I meant that Empathy, maybe not complete now, but it is the way to go, it fits more in scheme of things for Ubuntu and GNOME. So it felt to me that some of arguments presented in this thread were more about keeping Pidgin, not about problems of Empathy which sure must be addressed before final

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Andrew Sayers
Peteris Krisjanis wrote: > I think it is quite clear that so called 'regressions' about Empathy > is more like 'We are so used to Pidgin, let it be there'. Yes, there > are bugs and they should be fixed. And I am quite sure they will be. If you're saying that the complaint is about a specific bug

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-17 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
I think it is quite clear that so called 'regressions' about Empathy is more like 'We are so used to Pidgin, let it be there'. Yes, there are bugs and they should be fixed. And I am quite sure they will be. Empathy team seems to me are aiming for more concrete desktop experience and have done thei

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Danny Piccirillo [2009-06-17 2:22 -0400]: > I'm noticing that in the latest daily build of Ubuntu, Pidgin in still > included, who makes the actual change and when will that happen? I went through the MIRs last week, and changed the seeds now. It should happen on tomorrow's daily CDs. Martin --

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Danny Piccirillo
I'm noticing that in the latest daily build of Ubuntu, Pidgin in still included, who makes the actual change and when will that happen? On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:06, Andrew Sayers < andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote: > I guess my previous message wasn't clear - I'm not making an argumen

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Sayers
I guess my previous message wasn't clear - I'm not making an argument here from personal preference, I'm trying to file a bug in Ubuntu itself. Specifically, that dropping Pidgin will cause a regression in the user experience for migraters. I'm also not arguing that migraters are incapable of

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Danny Piccirillo
The discussion so far has been people arguing about why they prefer Empathy or Pidgin, but at UDS it was already decided that Empathy would ship with Karmic. I humbly request that we all stop bickering about any problems we may currently have with it, and start testing it and filing bug reports so

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 5:25:12 pm Andrew Sayers wrote: > I'm not usually one to stand in the way of progress, but it seems like > there are grave issues here for people migrating from other OSes. > > Migration to Linux from another OS is best done in two stages: first you > keep your old OS and

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Andrew Sayers
I'm not usually one to stand in the way of progress, but it seems like there are grave issues here for people migrating from other OSes. Migration to Linux from another OS is best done in two stages: first you keep your old OS and switch to cross-platform apps, then you switch your OS and keep

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Jordan Mantha
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Ken VanDine wrote: > Personally I don't see anything about empathy that is worse than pidgin. > Empathy has the plus of being extremely well integrated into GNOME and > the telepathy framework opens up such huge potential.  Sticking with > Pidgin keeps us locked in

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Ken VanDine
Personally I don't see anything about empathy that is worse than pidgin. Empathy has the plus of being extremely well integrated into GNOME and the telepathy framework opens up such huge potential. Sticking with Pidgin keeps us locked in the corner, we could be so much cooler if we can get out of

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Jordan Mantha [2009-06-16 9:57 -0700]: > Well, but we basically already did that for Jaunty. At the time it was > decided to wait for Karmic. At some point we have to just bite the > bullet and do it. I'm not a huge empathy fan (it's OK, but pidgin is > better for me) but I think it's clearly the

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Danny Piccirillo
What this? Apparently at UDS this was already discussed and Empathy is going to replace Pidgin-- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Karmic/MessagingAndCommunicationSelection On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:04, Asif Youssuff wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:39 +0100, Alexander H Deriziotis wro

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Asif Youssuff
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:39 +0100, Alexander H Deriziotis wrote: > This would be a pretty bad move regarding Ubuntu's development model. > With a 6-month release cycle, things need to remain cutting edge. If > every release is just going to be a rehash of a previous one, then > Canonical should be

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Alexander H Deriziotis
2009/6/16 Danny Piccirillo > Wait, I have a new proposal! Let's *not* include Empathy in Karmic, but > plan on including it in Karmic +1 (and *announce* this) > Why? Well, it will still give Empathy the attention it needs from > developers to fix the bugs that would be considered regressions duri

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
reading this discussion I decided to give a try. when I want to set status to Hidden using my yahoo account, it's setting it to busy. looking into launchpad I found same problem also for gmail, which I'm not sure yet. and this bug is reported to empathy bugzilla. https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
Empathy itself is ok with version 2.27.3 for an average user. The problem is telepathy: some protocols are behind pidgin's (such as MSN which is poorly supported and developers don't respond to bugs quickly) -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify setting

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Jordan Mantha
Danny Piccirillo wrote: > Wait, I have a new proposal! Let's *not* include Empathy in Karmic, but > plan on including it in Karmic +1 (and /announce/ this) > > Why? Well, it will still give Empathy the attention it needs from > developers to fix the bugs that would be considered regressions during

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Danny Piccirillo
If we decide to go with this, who can make the final call, and how/where can it be announced? On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:43, Asif Youssuff wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:37 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > > Wait, I have a new proposal! Let's not include Empathy in Karmic, but > > plan on inc

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Asif Youssuff
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:37 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > Wait, I have a new proposal! Let's not include Empathy in Karmic, but > plan on including it in Karmic +1 (and announce this) > > Why? Well, it will still give Empathy the attention it needs from > developers to fix the bugs that would

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-16 Thread Danny Piccirillo
Wait, I have a new proposal! Let's *not* include Empathy in Karmic, but plan on including it in Karmic +1 (and *announce* this) Why? Well, it will still give Empathy the attention it needs from developers to fix the bugs that would be considered regressions during the switch without actually replac

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-15 Thread Asif Youssuff
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 17:36 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > IMHO Empathy is great for most users, especially new ones, and it can > replace poth pidgin AND ekiga. It lacks the basic features like the > ones you mentioned, but i don't think they are showstoppers and > including it in Karmic or the

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-15 Thread Danny Piccirillo
Just blogged this here: http://pinstack.blogspot.com/2009/06/replace-pidgin-with-empathy-in-karmic.html I referenced Rick and Nicolò-- hope that's okay with you two! On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 18:22, Rick Spencer wrote: > I think switching to empathy is a fairly substantial change, and people > in g

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-15 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Heya I've started using Empathy as my default IM messenger with Hardy or interpid (can't remember i was compiling it by hand, it wasn't in the repo's back then). MSN is evil =D those that try to send me files or start audio/video chat I just tell them it's not supported on my platform and then ma

Re: about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-15 Thread Danny Piccirillo
Ah, yes-- this discussion will keep coming up until it finally happens =] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7462614 IMHO Empathy is *great* for most users, especially new ones, and it can replace poth pidgin AND ekiga. It lacks the basic features like the ones you mentioned, but i don't thi

about empathy as the default IM application

2009-06-01 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
Hello everyone, I'm really interested in the new version of empathy which will have video and audio support. This will be a really great feature and a step towards a complete IM experience. But on the other hand I'm quite worried of the empathy and telepathy status about basic features, which seem