On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:39 +0100, Alexander H Deriziotis wrote: > This would be a pretty bad move regarding Ubuntu's development model. > With a 6-month release cycle, things need to remain cutting edge. If > every release is just going to be a rehash of a previous one, then > Canonical should be releasing at least yearly.
Yes, a rehash is so much worse than releasing stuff that is *worse* than what came before. Obviously I disagree -- I think that there is a real problem with the idea that "newer is better" -- I believe that better is better -- and sometimes that means it's newer, and sometimes that means waiting until the newer item is actually better. Ubuntu shouldn't be focused on being newer, it should be focused on being better -- if it's not better, bug #1 doesn't /deserve/ to be closed. -Asif -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
