On 17/01/07, Jan Claeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op dinsdag 16-01-2007 om 18:43 uur [tijdzone +0900], schreef Arwyn
> Hainsworth:
> > There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones
> > currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a
> > result I'm going to h
Op dinsdag 16-01-2007 om 18:43 uur [tijdzone +0900], schreef Arwyn
Hainsworth:
> There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones
> currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a
> result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I
> would like to
On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 17:44 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 18:43 +0900 schrieb Arwyn Hainsworth:
> > Hello,
> >
> > There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones
> > currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a
> > result I'
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 18:43 +0900 schrieb Arwyn Hainsworth:
> Hello,
>
> There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones
> currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a
> result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I
> would like to
On 16/01/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:35:23AM +, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> > Quoting Arwyn Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > http://oss.gonicus.de/project/?group_id=6
> >
>
> The spec says "robust" and "extensible"; I'd say PHP is pretty much ruled
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:35:23AM +, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> Quoting Arwyn Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://oss.gonicus.de/project/?group_id=6
>
The spec says "robust" and "extensible"; I'd say PHP is pretty much ruled out.
Also, I'm not sure if Arwyn is interested in writing a
Quoting Arwyn Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> There is a need for a remote administration program. The ones
> currently available do not suit my needs or those of my clients. As a
> result I'm going to have to implement my own. However this time I
> would like to do it 'right'.
>
> I