AG Restringere wrote:
>> If you have a support contract with Canonical, then maybe Canonical
>has a
>> support obligation, but Ubuntu, in particular for proprietary
>software,
>has no
>> support "obligation".
>
>No, that's not it, let's not confuse the issue, the commercial side and
>Canonical has
> If you have a support contract with Canonical, then maybe Canonical has a
> support obligation, but Ubuntu, in particular for proprietary software,
has no
> support "obligation".
No, that's not it, let's not confuse the issue, the commercial side and
Canonical has nothing do with what I'm curren
> Similar to raring cycle, ubuntu desktop & server & core are not
> participating / pushing out Beta 1 image.
> To see which flavour participated see:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1
>
...
Please see the details on the release schedule:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro
wrote:
> Yes, that is what I was trying to say.
> They want it work and to be as fast as it can be, without worrying about it.
I'm out of this one, the straw man just came out.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-dis
> You aren't talking about open source. You're talking about proprietary
software distribution. From a FOSS perspective, the best
> practice is not to use it.
>
> Scott K
Agree with you on that one, ideally if only Nvidia drivers and the many
wireless cards had open-source drivers this would be s
2013/9/6 Sergio Schvezov
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro <
> p.oliveira.cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2013/9/6 Jordon Bedwell
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro
>>> wrote:
>>> > 2013/9/2 Jordon Bedwell
>>> >>
>>> >> my su
It's very simple:
Nvidia "certifies" a driver in the "long lived branch", when it releases a
new stable driver it recommends every Linux user to install that driver
immediately for the best experience. Ubuntu has a support obligation make
the latest most up-to-date "certified" drivers available t
If you have a support contract with Canonical, then maybe Canonical has a
support obligation, but Ubuntu, in particular for proprietary software, has no
support "obligation".
Scott K
On Friday, September 06, 2013 15:14:55 AG Restringere wrote:
> It's very simple:
>
> Nvidia "certifies" a drive
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro <
p.oliveira.cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/9/6 Jordon Bedwell
>
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro
>> wrote:
>> > 2013/9/2 Jordon Bedwell
>> >>
>> >> my suggestion is your realize the real facts
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro
wrote:
> 2013/9/2 Jordon Bedwell
>>
>> my suggestion is your realize the real facts
>> that all operating systems provide outdated drivers and it's your job
>> to update them if you want the latest drivers and to expect the distro
2013/9/2 Jordon Bedwell
> my suggestion is your realize the real facts
> that all operating systems provide outdated drivers and it's your job
> to update them if you want the latest drivers and to expect the distro
> to be able to keep up like that is silly to say the least.
>
That's a lie.
On
2013/9/6 Jordon Bedwell
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira Castro
> wrote:
> > 2013/9/2 Jordon Bedwell
> >>
> >> my suggestion is your realize the real facts
> >> that all operating systems provide outdated drivers and it's your job
> >> to update them if you want the
On 6 September 2013 15:05, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I'm a bit confused, sorry
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Kate Stewart wrote:
>>
>> Welcome to Saucy Salamander Beta 1 release, which will in time
>> become the 13.10 release.
>>
>
> Ok, Beta 1
>
>>
>> This alpha features images for Edubunt
I'm a bit confused, sorry
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Kate Stewart wrote:
> Welcome to Saucy Salamander Beta 1 release, which will in time
> become the 13.10 release.
>
>
Ok, Beta 1
> This alpha features images for Edubuntu, Kubuntu, Lubuntu,
> Ubuntu GNOME, UbuntuKylin, Ubuntu Studio and
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:23:13PM +0800, Ray Sun wrote:
>1. In step 5, we already can generate the deb packages without '-S', but
>why we finally use 'sbuild' to generate it? Is this only for signature?
>2. What's the difference between 'bzr builddeb' and 'sbuild'?
The answer to both
15 matches
Mail list logo
