Hi,
I am a little late to the party.
On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 11:49 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:29 AM Julian Andres Klode
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the vers
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> I've prepared a - not necessarily complete - conversion of this
> discussion to a PR [3].
Thanks - this is great!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:29 AM Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
> > which automatically stops autosync, which is probably what we want.
> >
> > Other such Ubuntu-o
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
> which automatically stops autosync, which is probably what we want.
>
> Other such Ubuntu-only packages do not, so if Debian were to package
> something with the
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:46 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > I've prepared a - not necessarily complete - conversion of this
> > discussion to a PR [3].
>
> Thanks - this is great!
Already polished for the feedback of Sally - thanks
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 07:02:06AM +, Simon Quigley wrote:
> I can think of one specific case where an exception to the rule would be
> warranted, and it is somewhat rare.
>
> Sometimes, we need to introduce a brand-new source package late in a cycle,
> for a good reason. Take the extreme ca
Hi Robie!
Firstly, thank you for driving this! This is also something that has been on my
mind this cycle.
Responses inline.
On 4/2/25 08:55 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
which automatically stops autosync, which is probably wha
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 12:14 AM Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 02:56, Robie Basak wrote:
>>
>>
>> Could we agree that all Ubuntu-only packages SHOULD always contain
>> `ubuntu` in their version string (this would usually be -0ubuntuX or
>> 0ubuntuX[1] if native) then, so th
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 02:56, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> Could we agree that all Ubuntu-only packages SHOULD always contain
> `ubuntu` in their version string (this would usually be -0ubuntuX or
> 0ubuntuX[1] if native) then, so that we don't have to think about it?
>
I think this definitely makes se
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:09:32AM -0300, Renan Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to
> comply.
Yes - I'm far less worried about ubuntu-advantage-tools - it seems
unlikely that would get added to Debian, given what it is :)
But having
Hmmm looking at `ubuntu-advantage-tools`; we use a very simplified version
string, and it's highly unlikely that Debian will ship some
`ubuntu-advantage-tools` isn't it?
However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to
comply.
[]s
Renan
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:56 AM R
11 matches
Mail list logo
