Hmmm looking at `ubuntu-advantage-tools`; we use a very simplified version
string, and it's highly unlikely that Debian will ship some
`ubuntu-advantage-tools` isn't it?
However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to
comply.

[]s
Renan

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:56 AM Robie Basak <robie.ba...@ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
> which automatically stops autosync, which is probably what we want.
>
> Other such Ubuntu-only packages do not, so if Debian were to package
> something with the same source package name, it may autosync, which is
> probably not what we want.
>
> Unless it's in the sync blocklist, but now there are three possible
> states for an Ubuntu-only package to be with respect to autosync, which
> is just unnecessary work for concerned reviewers.
>
> I just reviewed the following SRUs, which (sort of) uses a mix of both:
>
> lxd-installer | 1          | focal                       | source
> lxd-installer | 1          | jammy                       | source
> lxd-installer | 4          | noble                       | source
> lxd-installer | 4ubuntu0.1 | noble-updates               | source
> lxd-installer | 4ubuntu0.2 | noble/unapproved/39f530b    | source
> lxd-installer | 8          | oracular                    | source
> lxd-installer | 8.1        | oracular/unapproved/74f18e3 | source
> lxd-installer | 12         | plucky                      | source
>
> Could we agree that all Ubuntu-only packages SHOULD always contain
> `ubuntu` in their version string (this would usually be -0ubuntuX or
> 0ubuntuX[1] if native) then, so that we don't have to think about it?
>
> Are there any reasons for an exception to this rule, where an autosync
> would actually be desirable if Debian were to introduce such a package?
> If it's not for a common reason, then perhaps an additional policy might
> be that there SHOULD be something in debian/README.source that explains
> any deviation from this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robie
>
> [1] No need for an epoch to comply though I don't think.
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Reply via email to