Re: Consistency of package versioning in Ubuntu-only packages

2025-04-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 02:56, Robie Basak wrote: > > Could we agree that all Ubuntu-only packages SHOULD always contain > `ubuntu` in their version string (this would usually be -0ubuntuX or > 0ubuntuX[1] if native) then, so that we don't have to think about it? > I think this definitely makes se

Re: Consistency of package versioning in Ubuntu-only packages

2025-04-02 Thread Robie Basak
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:09:32AM -0300, Renan Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to > comply. Yes - I'm far less worried about ubuntu-advantage-tools - it seems unlikely that would get added to Debian, given what it is :) But having

Re: Consistency of package versioning in Ubuntu-only packages

2025-04-02 Thread Renan Rodrigo Barbosa
Hmmm looking at `ubuntu-advantage-tools`; we use a very simplified version string, and it's highly unlikely that Debian will ship some `ubuntu-advantage-tools` isn't it? However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to comply. []s Renan On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:56 AM R