Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ca-certificates
When installing the package, it failed. Sorry, I didn't see exactly what
happened, as I was running an update with 44 packages
I am using a fully patched Intrepid system, x86 arch.
The installation of the package failed.
ProblemType: Pa
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20284073/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20284074/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
package ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess post-
importance bug since it disables a working system!
Does anyone agree with me, or am I missing something here?
--mobrien118
--
hald segfault when using a raid volume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
FYI, it looks like Chris's PPA packages fixed it, though.
Thank goodness! If I had been remote from this machine (which I will be
for the next few months) it would have been a nightmare!
--
hald segfault when using a raid volume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689
You received this bug notifi
I think I can get you started.
I mean, the first step to creating a RAID volume is to think it out.
Where do you need redundancy? Where do you need speed? Then map out your
partitions (especially if you have different sized disks).
Remember that RAID will cause a slight (in the case of RAID0 or R
To the main Ubuntu repos or to your PPA?
--
hald segfault when using a raid volume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
e license compatibility of having NTFS drivers
running on the linux kernel? Surely, if that can be accomplished, they
can make a driver fore ZFS. And the point about NVidia drivers, surely
their license is more restrictive than the CDDL.
Just my thoughts in support of solving this bug ;-)
Cheers,
--mo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image
When I asked to use a shell session to evaluate the situation, it "soft"
froze. Finally the shell appeared. I exited the shell and the window
that spawned it had frozen. After about 10 minutes, I forced it to
close, then the "terminal" portion
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949555/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949556/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949557/Dependencies.txt
** A
I see that the status is changed to "Fix Released" but I am not getting
it from the repos.
This is probably due to my ignorance on the meanings of the status
choices, but I would assume that "Released" means that it is in the
repos, while "Fix Committed" would mean that it is ready to be added and
Matthew,
Thanks for helping me understand the release process. I really
appreciate it!
--
package ubuntu-docs 9.04.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353117
You received this bug notification because you
Ahhh! Is this bug back?
The server I was having a problem with is 1000 miles away from me now
and I rebooted it and it didn't come back up. Thinking back a few hours,
I remember that "update-manager" installed a HAL update.
N! I need my server and this is going to force me into weeks
Didn't mean to sound upset at anyone in my previous post. I know that
Chris did an awesome job with the first patch. I'm just upset and
looking for a support group :-)
The sooner we can get a permanent fix for this issue, the sooner I can
get a good night's sleep.
Please, anyone who is capable, h
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
I ran a set of updates a few weeks ago that caused my (remote) ubuntu
Jaunty system to not boot up.
It was installed off of the "alternate" CD, with "md" (RAID) devices
enabled. I have had a number of problems with it, getting it
oing,initially, and
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586950/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "LsMod.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586951/LsMod.txt
** Attachment added: "LsPci.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586952/LsPci.txt
** Attachment added: "Xorg
"error: dbus_bus_get: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.FileNotFound: Failed to
connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or
directory"
OK, but this is expected, I believe, because I am running in "Drop to
root shell with networking" right now.
When I try to start normally, I can't
Yeah, that'show I logged in when I got this error from a "root shell
with networking".
But when I boot normally, there is no network, so SSH doesn't work. I
can't even ping the machine. The desktop "appears" normally, but with
the "Failed to load HAL" (I think, not sure of the phrasing) error
mess
Thanks Timo.
I'm anxious to figure this one out, since my fresh install of a system
has been unusable 90% of the time since I installed Ubuntu on it.
Please, HAL guys,let me know what I need to do next.
--mobrien118
--
HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (nu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bugzilla3
When I try to install bugzilla3 (3.2.5.1-2) it makes it to the step
"run-parts: executing /etc/bugzilla3/pre-
checksetup.d/50patchtemplatefordebian" and then hangs indefinitely.
There is a process running called "/bin/sh
/usr/share/bugzilla3/li
I had this bug, but downloaded the *BETA* 64bit Flash Player for Linux
and replaced the link to the 32bit "wrapped" one in Mozilla's plugin
directory, and now the error is gone. I *didn't* remove the flash player
package, though.
I wonder why Ubuntu didn't use the 64bit flash plugin for this relea
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dbconfig-common
During upgrade to lucid... update manager froze, no mouse or kbrd
response. had to kill update-manager in ssh terminal and run dpkg
--reconfigure -a
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: dbconfig-common 1.8.44
ProcVers
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019780/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019781/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019782/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub
I'm not sure if this is a grub error, kernel error or ext4 error.
I recently ran apt-get upgrade on karmic and ended up with the grub
error "Error 13: Invalid or unsupported executable format" after
installing kernel 2.6.31-12-generic. If I select 2
I have the same problem when trying to install plone3-site. Work through
the unmet dependencies only to find that zope-common 0.5.49 is required
but only 0.5.46ubuntu1 is available in the repos.
I'm actually just trying to install zope2.10 with mine and it still has
this unmet dep.
** Package ch
I changed the affected package to zope2.10 since it is likely to gain
more exposure (maybe?) and it is more relevant since it is the default
zope in karmic.
This seems like a no brainer. The maintainer for zope needs to update
the version of zope-common in the repos or change the dependency.
Than
I was getting these messages filling up my root hard drive very quickly.
I discovered that my heat sink was all clogged up with dust and cleaning
it fixed the errors, but it shouldn't be doing this anyway. Eventually
my heat sink is going to get gunked up again and the only way I'm going
to know i
The exact error, which I'm sure you guessed, is:
Could not calculate the upgrade
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
This can be caused by:
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Unofficial software pack
Public bug reported:
I've been trying for months and always get the same error that may be
caused by using a pre-release or unapproved packages. This is a VERY old
install (started at 8.04) so things are a little crazy, but I don't even
know how to troubleshoot this issue...
ProblemType: Bug
Dist
Suggested solution did not work.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458
Title:
Can't upgrade from
I did not have that ppa enabled (and haven't since a prior version of
Ubuntu) but I went ahead and re-added it wiat "apt-add-repository" and
then used "ppa-purge" to remove it again. Then i tried to process the
upgrade again and it still failed with the same error. I'm sorry, I am
pretty handy with
Following along the same logic, I id the same for
ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates, which actually DID have some packages installed
already. Same result, though.
Is the best thing to just keep going through PPAs and purging them? I
don't have too many, but some of them shouldn't conflict with official
pack
Bot (I don't expect you to actually respond, so, anyone else, please
help me out here): I have followed the instructions given. I didn't have
that repo enabled to begin with. If there are remnants of it somewhere,
please let me know how I can remove them.
--
You received this bug notification bec
Never mind. Looked at the apt.log, which was filled with garbage, and
realized it was some old packages that were the same version as the
Ubuntu ones only with "git[some other stuff]" as the version. Tracked
them all down in Synaptic and forced the official versions (a
"downgrade").
Ran d-release-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862129 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Simply running "apt-get dist-upgrade" succeeded in installing the
package immediately after the Oneiric upgrade (even before rebooting).
Not sure what caused this issue...
--
You received this bug notificat
This happens to me when I load Google-Chrome. Once it loads, it asks me
for my password to unlock the keyring, the it's off to the races!
It doesn't seem to ever stop using 100% CPU (on my 3.4GHz Pentium D).
If I kill it, everything seems fine.
I have a fully updated Precise installation.
Is th
Public bug reported:
Samba simply failed to install during Oneric upgrade.
I'll see if it was a corrupted package download by removing it from the
cache and trying the upgrade again.
All other packages installed without issue.
Here is the string suggested for the bug name: "package samba 2:3.5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874994
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/u
I'm definitely not a network guru, so I don't have a lot to offer toward
a solution, but if I see a possible solution posted here, I'm bound to
try it.
Cheers,
--mobrien118
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695
Public bug reported:
Doing software update on Maverick beta (3 days before RC release
scheduled). This package failed to install.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: python-virtkey 0.60
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806/+attachment/1643219/+files/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806
Public bug reported:
I ran the Natty upgrade on several systems, but, of course, it only
fails on my Server (which is running desktop edition 64bit, fyi)
During the upgrade, it failed when installing "Python" which let to
roughly 1100 unconfigured packages and an unbootable system.
I was able to
Sorry, I should have requested that this bug be closed.
I used dpkg to remove and purge the python package, then apt-get
installed "ubuntu-desktop" which, aside from losing a very few custom
settings, worked perfectly.
I don't know if that indicates a package corrupted during download, or
if, by
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-virtual
I have a *relatively* unaltered install of Ubuntu Desktop running in
VirtualBox 4.0.4 and I recently upgraded from a working Maverick to a
working Natty beta1.
I decided to try the "linux-image-virtual" kernel, so I installed it,
alon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752701
Title:
ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/---- does not
exist
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
Is there any chance to get this fixed before release?
Is there any more information I can provide?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752701
Title:
ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/-
This issue was fixed.
It had something to do with the fact that I have a RAID 1 array with a
MBR on it (because I treat the raw array as a raw drive for a VirtualBox
VM I'm running on the machine).
In the next version of Ubuntu immediately following this one, HAL was
able to deal with this scenar
Actually, this might have been another bug (I have quite a few Ubuntu
systems that I like to mess around with) Either way, they're all working
now. Sorry for not keeping on top of the bug report, and thanks for
asking about it.
Cheers!
--mobrien118
--
HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: cou
47 matches
Mail list logo
