[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown

2009-06-02 Thread lavinog
Like CylnZ said, my fan seems to not spin as fast as it used to. I don't have a way to get actual numbers, but I can tell by the sound the fan makes that it doesn't reach its maximum speed now when at 100% cpu for a couple of mins. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launch

[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown

2009-06-01 Thread lavinog
My laptop has not reached a critical temp yet, but I can feel alot of heat coming from the keyboard when idle. This was not the case with hardy-32bit (Clean install of jaunty-32bit currently) AMD Turion 64 ML-32 ATI 200m (currently using xorg-ati drivers, while in hardy I was using fgrlx, which

[Bug 336108] Re: Notification is blanked on mouse over in vmware

2009-05-03 Thread lavinog
With no compositing, if my mouse is in the region originally I get a quick flicker (<100ms) of the notification. This does not seem to be the expected behavior per David's link: "Whenever the pointer moves into a bubble, whatever is behind the bubble should instantly become no longer blurred" I

[Bug 133139] Re: update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow

2009-05-08 Thread lavinog
This seems to be still an issue in jaunty. I scrolled down the update list using the down key, and when it got to the bottom, the update panel was displaying change logs for every package. Also it gets stuck on kernel packages for a second, but causes 100% cpu on one core. (most likely because of

[Bug 373974] [NEW] Dialogs steal focus during update

2009-05-08 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager During an update, I was writing an email. A window came up just as I pressed the spacebar. The window disappeared before I could read it. The window was most likely asking about what to do about menu.lst since there was a kernel update.

[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update

2009-05-08 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26492120/Dependencies.txt -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 244110] Re: python2.5-dev cannot be installed

2008-07-14 Thread lavinog
Why is this marked as invalid? If manually installing the deb file fixes this shouldn't this be an easy fix to correct the repositories? -- python2.5-dev cannot be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 349084] Re: Soft reset failed, AMD SB750

2009-04-10 Thread lavinog
I have the same errors: Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H rev 1.0 (ATI 780G chipset) There is a bios update that I can do, I will give that a try and see if there are any changes. ** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25234073/lspci-vnvn.log -- Soft reset f

[Bug 349084] Re: Soft reset failed, AMD SB750

2009-04-10 Thread lavinog
uname -a: Linux Shredder 2.6.28-11-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 8 04:39:23 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux (don't know how to post multiple files in one comment) ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25234095/dmesg.log -- Soft reset failed, AMD SB750 https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2009-07-07 Thread lavinog
Looking at load-graph.cpp: load_graph_expose() looks to be using cairo_curve_to() for every point on every refresh. This interpolation seems to me to be wasteful when there is no change in data. Memory usage tends to be a straight line. I propose doing a quick check in the for loop to compare th

[Bug 392073] Re: update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning

2009-07-17 Thread lavinog
It has happened a couple of times on two of my computers. I can't seem to recreate the issue. It has only happened on the automatically launched update manager, and it seems like it only happens when it sits for a while. My update settings are: All 4 Ubuntu updates are checked Check for updates:

[Bug 369650] Re: gtk_spin_button bugs in gnumeric

2009-07-31 Thread lavinog
looks like this bug was caused by this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323228 -- gtk_spin_button bugs in gnumeric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 398552] Re: longhaul is loaded despite being reported broken

2009-07-27 Thread lavinog
I would like to request loading it as a module. According to VIA: http://www.viaarena.com/displaydownload.aspx?PageID=1&DSCat=32&DCatType=3 "The Power Saver feature is considered experimental at this time and users are advised to visit VIA Arena regularly for the latest update. An IDE lockup iss

[Bug 43233] Re: "sudo -k" fails when timestamp is in the future

2007-09-24 Thread lavinog
This has been a problem on my server at work. It turned out that a hard drive was corrupting the hwclock. I don't know how it was doing this but every time the machine rebooted with the hd connected the date in cmos would reset to 00/1/1983. With the any other drive in its place it works fine. T

[Bug 43233] Re: "sudo -k" fails when timestamp is in the future

2007-09-24 Thread lavinog
edit to previous post: Actually I am not able to use sudo -K at all through ssh I had to go into /var/run/sudo/username/ as root using sudo su where i had: -rw--- 1 root root 0 2008-04-20 12:05 0 -rw--- 1 root root 0 2007-09-24 13:59 1 -rw--- 1 root root 0 2007-09-24 13:58 tty1 then i

[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)

2008-03-12 Thread lavinog
I have the same card in some of my computers...the past couple of drivers have been very buggy for this card. The bar code thing was fixed in last months ATI driver, but you won't be able to get it in the gusty repositories...you have to get the driver directly from ATI. I think the best solutio

[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)

2008-03-12 Thread lavinog
Sorry, wasn't sure how to a link: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Gutsy_Installation_Guide also by any chance are you using the ubuntu ati restricted driver and if so what version? -- Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159594 You received t

[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)

2008-03-13 Thread lavinog
You should probably change the status of this bug report. The ATI restricted driver is not maintained by AMD not Ubuntu developers. you can find out what version you are using by typing in a terminal: dmesg | grep 'fglrx' you should see a line that looks like this: [ 52.012785] [fglrx] module l

[Bug 550515] [NEW] changes to indention options require restart

2010-03-28 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: geany Steps to recreate: open preferences>editor>indentation tab Change type (tabs to spaces or spaces to tabs) click OK The change doesn't take effect until geany is restarted. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: geany 0.18-1 ProcVers

[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart

2010-03-28 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42316282/Dependencies.txt -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 550623] Re: hal-disable-polling assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: hal-disable-polling terminated

2010-03-28 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333874/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333875/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333876/Disassembly.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart

2010-03-29 Thread lavinog
Could some sort of notice be displayed since other options take effect without reloading or restarting. The current behavior appears broken when there is no feedback of any kind. -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-08 Thread lavinog
@james79: if the issue is that you are low on memory, you can release the trace buffer with: echo 1|sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb I wrote a init script that does this automatically after a trace. I can clean it up and post it if it will help. If the issue is that you run ou

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-05-08 Thread lavinog
I am attempting to install Lubuntu, but I am getting the same behavior with the live cd (there is no alt install yet). The problem here is that clicking install causes the screen to flicker and the installation dialog keeps moving down...I suspect this to be caused by this bug since I have exper

[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
What image format is the base image? I just tested with qcow2 format and increased the size from 6g to 10g just fine (of course the file system size remained the same) kvm-img create -b Lucid_64_Base.qcow2 -f qcow2 test_img.qcow2 10G If you don't specify a format I think raw is used: kvm-img cre

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
I am sure it is taken seriously. The dev is likely tending to more important issues at the moment. The issue isn't a security issue, and it doesn't seem to cause any data loss. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile

2010-01-22 Thread lavinog
I noticed that the first lines of dumping the pack file show the size of the pack which is pretty close to the size of the missing memory: Fri Jan 22 10:22:38 CST 2010 total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1021768 444560 577208 0

[Bug 319146] Re: When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information.

2010-02-03 Thread lavinog
I am affected by this. I have installed Ubuntu on many computers for people that just wanted a basic computer. Ubuntu was perfect for them, and I rarely get any calls for help. Many of these users would want me to handle any major upgrades. I shouldn't have to keep records of who has what versi

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile

2010-03-02 Thread lavinog
This may need to fall under another bug report: Today I booted into recovery mode to recover some data from a failed drive, then resumed the normal boot into a console. I then moved a large number of files from one drive to another. During the transfer I thought that the system was acting slug

[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update

2009-12-03 Thread lavinog
This seems to have become worse: Both the "Downloading Updates" and "Applying Updates" windows steal focus. This might fix itself if the update manager is going to be replaced by the software center. -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2009-11-12 Thread lavinog
>From what I have learned about SMART over the past 2 years is that SMART >doesn't fail until the Normalized value falls below the threshold. In my case my reallocated sector count is: Normalized: 179 Worst: 179 Threshold: 140 Value: 161 palimpsest is giving me a warning that my disk has many bad

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2009-11-12 Thread lavinog
Looking at atasmart.c in libatasmart-0.17: is this the section that causes the warning: starting at line 1269 if ((!strcmp(a->name, "reallocated-sector-count") || !strcmp(a->name, "current-pending-sector")) && a->pretty_value > 0)

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2009-11-12 Thread lavinog
disregard my above comment: strcmp returns 0 for match. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt

[Bug 483847] [NEW] Search history cleared after an install

2009-11-16 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic Search for a package using the search button or ctrl-f. Then install a package. The panel on the left that shows the recent searches is cleared, and the user needs to redo the search. The panel acts as a search history, but fails to keep the his

[Bug 483847] Re: Search history cleared after an install

2009-11-16 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35761369/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35761370/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35761371/ProcStatus.txt -- Search

[Bug 562774] [NEW] (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed

2010-04-13 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp When starting yelp from the command line I get the following: --- (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MI

[Bug 562774] Re: (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed

2010-04-13 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44114436/Dependencies.txt -- (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-04-14 Thread lavinog
@Petar: I don't think this bug is your issue if uninstalling ureadahead didn't help. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
It was mentioned in this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 that once online profiling is implemented, this issue will go away. I am wondering if a bug needs to be filed for the kernel because there is nothing to indicate that the memory is being used for tracing memory. Usi

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
I see 128000 kb was hardcoded into the source of ureadahead. I also see in mmiotrace.txt where this is used as an example: --- Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either $ grep -i lost mydump.txt which tells you exactly how many events were lost, o

[Bug 552165] Re: ureadahead should be disabled by default

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
Disabling ureadahead by default does not seem like a reasonable solution. There might be another problem that is compounded by ureadahead. It might help if you post a bootchart. You might want to look at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 -- ureadahead should be disa

[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
Could ureadahead have something to do with this? I noticed this on my laptop when fooling around with ureadahead. After testing in a vm I can do the following: sudo touch /forcefsck reboot. fsck stalls at 70% for a sec, and the screen jumps directly to the desktop. ls / shows forcefsck still exist

[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
also after a successful reboot, I get a crash report for plymouthd (#553745) -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
Nevermind about ureadahead. I uninstalled it and got the same behavior. -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 557887] [NEW] URL in description ends with a period

2010-04-08 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notification-daemon Viewing the information for popup notifications with ubuntu software center: The hyperlink includes the final period in the description. This is minor, but should be an easy fix. The simple solution is to remove the period. A better

[Bug 559525] [NEW] Trace should ignore files in /var/log

2010-04-09 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Looking at the dump of my pack file, I see many log files listed. These files are constantly changing so it doesn't make much sense to store their information in the pack file. The files are more likely stored in more distant locations of the

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
kvm /storage/greg/vm/Lucid_64.qcow2 -m 1024 -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
I get the same result booting from the live cds: kvm -m 1024 -cdrom ubuntu-10.04-beta1-desktop-amd64.iso kvm -m 1024 -cdrom lucid-desktop-amd64.iso lucid-desktop-amd64.iso is the daily-cd md5sums: d88edd4c3640e2c90dd2bce16dbe86ae lucid-desktop-amd64.iso 7341b637218cf9a9b2334293c3df7e94 ubuntu-1

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
If I attempt to move the mouse from one end of the screen to the other, it pauses half way in between and cpu usage goes to 80% - 100% (measured in htop) The lack of responsiveness makes it unusable. I will try jaunty and see...I don't recall having this issue with it. Removing vmmouse is a solut

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
vmmouse_detect; echo $? produces 1, should that mean something? -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
If I am using kvm-qemu and not VMware, should the vmmouse driver be active? I will double check with the vmmouse_detect thing, but xorg is logging: (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_INIT (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_ON (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enabled ... (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enable absolute mode

[Bug 548996] Re: high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized

2010-04-18 Thread lavinog
The issue seems to be fixed now. -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 137388] Re: LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set when it shouldn't be

2010-03-30 Thread lavinog
I just noticed this in a qemu vm with lucid. Desktop effects is not enabled, but launching the terminal with ctrl-alt-T I get direct rendering: No (LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set) If I launch from the menu or alt-f2 then gnome-terminal I get yes. I am trying to troubleshoot some other weirdness and

[Bug 553081] [NEW] [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse Running lucid beta1 64bit in kvm-qemu vm: Sometime prior to beta1, system was responsive. Now I can barely move the mouse without causing one of the cpus on the host machine to peg out. And /usr/bin/X using all of the cpu resou

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754836/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754837/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754838/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment ad

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
I removed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 and installed 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4 from launchpad, and the system was responsive after reboot. Then, I installed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 back and the system had poor response again after reboot. What I don't understand though is that prior to today I had 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4, but

[Bug 18661] Re: Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp

2010-04-23 Thread lavinog
/tmp was a subdir of / in Karmic on my systems. -- Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.u

[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)

2010-05-17 Thread lavinog
This could be a bug with the drive itself. 32MB/s seems really slow for a SSD. Maybe it would help if you post the specifics about your drive: sudo hdparm -i /dev/sda -- ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577763 You received this bug no

[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)

2010-05-17 Thread lavinog
According to this site: http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2008/05/asus-eee-pc-ssd-read-and-write-tests-4g.html 32MB/s seems about right for a 16g 900. The 4g version reaches 44MB/s. I thought kerneloops was disabled in the final release, but it is shown in your bootcharts. Are you sure you are runn

[Bug 582102] [NEW] Provide a method to ignore certain files

2010-05-17 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Wishlist: I noticed that dropbox can have a significant impact on boot time. I personally do not consider it to be essential to the boot loading experience, but if I happen to have the daemon set to start automatically, ureadahead will trac

[Bug 582432] [NEW] update manager should cache changelog information by url

2010-05-18 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Currently update-manager will download the same changelogs multiple times if there are multiple packages with the same changelog. Example: Today I started wireshark to capture packets. Started update manager The first package listed was ap

[Bug 582432] Re: update manager should cache changelog information by url

2010-05-18 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48674263/Dependencies.txt -- update manager should cache changelog information by url https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 575877] Re: gnome-keyring mysteriously asks for keyring password on startup

2010-06-10 Thread lavinog
There are three bugs here: - Keyring is not unlocked when user logs in with password. - Keyring steals focus with always on top dialog (frustrating when you are in the middle of typing something) - Keyring doesn't provide information about what application is requiring the keyring. This should b

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-05-14 Thread lavinog
Setting the live cd to run in safe mode works around the issue. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-05-14 Thread lavinog
The high cpu usage was on the host only when the mouse on the guest was being moved rapidly. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 133139] Re: update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow

2010-06-04 Thread lavinog
I cannot recreate the issue in lucid. -- update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 392073] Re: update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning

2010-06-04 Thread lavinog
Refreshing the package list by clicking "Check" button in update-manager allows the installation of the updates with the "Install Updates" Button. -- update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392073 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 363550] Re: mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup

2010-06-06 Thread lavinog
Just running mountmanager clears all comments from my fstab without asking the user about saving any changes. Combined with running with admin privileges without the users knowledge, this is very dangerous. -- mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup https://bugs.

[Bug 590455] [NEW] mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.

2010-06-06 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountmanager If sudo has been used for another program within the sudo time limit, starting mountmanager will automatically run with root privileges. For example the following commands will cause fstab to be rewritten without user consent: sudo ls mm T

[Bug 590455] Re: mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.

2010-06-06 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49775389/Dependencies.txt -- mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 301203] Re: slabtop --once seems to exit without output

2010-06-07 Thread lavinog
This appears to still be an issue in Lucid slabtop -V procps version 3.2.8 slabtop --once > slabtop.txt cat slabtop.txt shows nothing, but the file size is 1518 bytes. head slabtop.txt will show the file as long as the last line isn't displayed. top -n 1 > top.txt creates a readable file -- s

[Bug 345374] Re: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet

2010-05-28 Thread lavinog
Why is this bug marked incomplete? Doesn't incomplete mean that more information is needed? -- Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears

2010-05-30 Thread lavinog
A couple of my family members liked the timer for the same reason Hellenion mentioned. It would seem that allowing the user to configure this behaviour would be the best way to go about this even if it is only configurable with gconf. -- Shutdown timer no longer appears https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 577592] Re: qemu-kvm dependencies require X

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
The guest is not required to use SDL though. The guest could use a vnc connection (I don't think audio is available when using a vnc connection either.) Although I am not sure of the actual issue with having X installed though. Is the issue the extra space used? If so, wouldn't the extra space

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
@Petar: I replied to your comment at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1363165 I do not think this bug is related to your issue. I would like to help you figure out what is going on, but not here. To everyone else: The cause of the bug is known. Maybe Scott can give us so

[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller

2010-05-10 Thread lavinog
"should really raise a warning if ../base-dont-touch.img is smaller than 10GB" Here you are saying if the forked image is larger than the base image. "If QEmu doesn't handle a differnent size, even a bigger one, I don't see why qemu-img create -b ... should take a size argument at all." I just sh

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-10 Thread lavinog
I posted a upstart script that can recover the memory used after a profile: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9271524&postcount=9 -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller

2010-05-10 Thread lavinog
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-11 Thread lavinog
This bug exists in karmic also. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
I don't think the space makes a difference: Without the space: ionice -p 3477 idle with the space: ionice -p 3525 idle -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
some commands don't really need a space for values: ps aux|head -n1 is the same as ps aux|head -n 1 -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 563076] Re: apt-xapian-index should live in /var/cache

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
If you delete the index, does it automatically rebuild itself, or does the user have to manually initiate the updater? The information is automatically generated on a weekly basis. Also it isn't a cache file, so why should it be stored in the cache folder? -- apt-xapian-index should live in /va

[Bug 579523] [NEW] update should avoid being run when on the battery

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt-xapian-index Currently apt-xapian-index uses a significant amount of cpu while updating. If the battery level is low at the time of the update, the sudden increase in cpu usage could lead to a loss of the users data. I propose doing a check for if

[Bug 579523] Re: update should avoid being run when on the battery

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
I stand corrected, anacron does avoid running when on battery. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- update should avoid being run when on the battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 528543] Re: Optimize battery lifespan option

2010-03-08 Thread lavinog
The 40% limit is for if you plan to store your battery. I would not recomend operating a portable device at such a low capacity. Most manufactures seem to agree that charging a battery to the full capacity can reduce the life expectancy of the battery, but this seems to be in 80-95% area. Sho

[Bug 523072] Re: No longer able to resume from suspend with the Lucid kernel

2010-03-23 Thread lavinog
I am having the same problem except I am using the open source radeon driver. enabling pm_trace yielded this result: [0.601249] Magic number: 0:523:740 [0.601295] hash matches /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/drivers/base/power/main.c:471 Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu lucid

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile

2010-03-23 Thread lavinog
Just found out about /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb It reads 128000 on my vm which is currently showing about 322M (tracing on) 182M (tracing off) diff=140M so it looks like it is the tracing buffer. Some questions: 1. Why is it that no application can differentiate memory used by the

[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears

2010-03-25 Thread lavinog
Looking at the source of gtk-logout-helper.c from indicator-session-0.2.7: in session_action(): if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_LOG_OUT) { res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy, "Logout", INT_MAX, &error,

[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more

2010-03-25 Thread lavinog
Just noticed this today on my lucid -32bit machine. Open software center, maximize the window, choose a package and click more info. Cpu usage jumps really high until you restore the window size or get out of the info page. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more

2010-03-25 Thread lavinog
I guess my issue requires a separate bug report. The issue I have only occurs when you view details of a package when the package doesn't have a screenshot and the window is maximized. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notif

[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Strike my last comment, it does it with packages that do have a screenshot. Openoffice.org Word Processor is one. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 548911] [NEW] package details shows a shadow when no image is available

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Steps to reproduce: Find a package that doesn't have a screenshot such as Biloba or 7zip. Click on "more info" to go to view the package details. A blank white screenshot is displayed with a drop shadow. The drop shadow gives the appearan

[Bug 548911] Re: package details shows a shadow when no image is available

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42064045/Dependencies.txt -- package details shows a shadow when no image is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 548920] [NEW] resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center If I resize the left pane back and forth, the forward and back buttons get distorted. I tested this on my laptop which is using the opensource radeon driver, and also using a qemu vm. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26

[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066220/Dependencies.txt -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "screenshot of button corruption" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066750/Screenshot-Ubuntu%20Software%20Center.png -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 548937] [NEW] image not saved correctly on close

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot Steps to reproduce: Take a screenshot. Note the file size (mine were usually about 560k) Open the file in f-spot. Crop the image as small as possible. Exit f-spot, and click save. Look at the file size of the image: It didn't change. (560k for a 1

[Bug 548937] Re: image not saved correctly on close

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42067469/Dependencies.txt -- image not saved correctly on close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 537418] Re: Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Something to also note is that clicking on the empty box displays an Ubuntu logo. So it seems that the logo should be displayed here, and not a blank image. -- Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537418 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 548386] Re: Wrong Ubuntu Icon used

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Isn't it still the official logo? -- Wrong Ubuntu Icon used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

  1   2   >