Yes, all fine meanwhile - don't know precisely when it went away.
--
Boot-splash not centered in frame-buffer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196468
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Meanwhile I upgraded to Hardy and no longer use 'cups-lpd'.
So I cannot comment any more on this.
Ingo
--
cups-lpd results in freezing of Gusty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17110284/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17110285/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17110286/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
The intermittent hot-fix (new restricted-modules) obviously was too hot:
The networking module 'vm-bridge' does not load. Forcing it with
'modprobe vm-bridge' gives following:
# modprobe vm-bridge
FATAL: Error inserting vm_bridge
(/lib/modules/2.6.24-21-generic/kernel/drivers/misc/parallels/vm-br
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19812857/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19812858/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19812859/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Additional information:
1. I did not select 'check partitition prior to backup'
2. Hardy brings version 0.6.4 which crashes, Lenny contains v0.6.7 which
works fine.
--
partimage crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300356
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
tried with installing the Debian-Lenny 'partimage_0.6.7-1_amd64.deb' in Hardy:
all works smoothly.
As it is essentially only one file, the binary /usr/sbin/partimage and
all dependencies are fulfilled, I consider this a good fix.
Just put said Debian version to updates solves all.
** Attachment
It is essentially just 1 file, the binary /usr/sbin/partimage
** Changed in: partimage (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
partimage crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
'man cups-lpd' tells me:
DESCRIPTION
cups-lpd is the CUPS Line Printer Daemon ("LPD") mini-server that sup‐
ports legacy client systems that use the LPD protocol. cups-lpd does
not act as a standalone network daemon but instead operates using the
Internet "super-s
Today we got another kernel update to 2.6.24-22
Parallels- modules are still missing :-(
Does nobody care whether sold software is adopted and usable?
** Changed in: parallels (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Partner Developers
(canonical-partner-dev)
Status: New => Conf
** Changed in: parallels (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Partner Developers (canonical-partner-dev) => Brian
Thomason (brian-thomason)
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The package already has been fixed, just those who are using
[b]Hardy[/b] still have to wait for the backport - that's [b]Long
Term[/b] (Support)
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug notification because you ar
I am still with Hardy and have no intention to use Intrepid. Hardy will
survive Intrepid by more than a year with regard to updates.
So, I am awaiting to get it fixed in Hardy's kernel 2.6.24-21 - keep in
mind, it is a LTS version!
--
/boot/config-{uname -r} does not contain correct kernel confi
I still get it on a dayly base and can easily predict when apport will
pop up and report it:
When after logging in the icon for a nfs-mount on my desktop is
displaced in a different position, it only takes minutes until apport
reports the crash.
Hardy with all available an proposed fixes.
--
na
if the problem had been fixed for some intermittend time as stated
above, does that not mean it is not caused by nautilus-achtins and
instead should be assigned to nautilus?
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug
do not have any samba shares
available, nor configured.
Instead I mount some nfs-export upon start of my GNOME-session using a starter
with this command:
'mount :/'
Corresponding entry in /etc/fstab is:
:/ /home/ingo/Ingo nfs
noauto,rw,user,soft 0 0
I did not fi
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18922739/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18922740/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18922741/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
I don't know about Intrepid, but in Hardy-amd64 it still persists:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev$ ls -l cd*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2008-10-27 12:13 cdrom -> scd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2008-10-27 12:13 cdrom1 -> scd0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2008-10-27 12:13 cdrw -> scd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2008
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 204272 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204272
Got some problem with the backtrace - however I do attach it here anyhow
Installed debug symbols for totem-gstreamer.
But I am unable to call totem with a parameter like 'totem /dev/video0' This is
not accep
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 204272 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204272
And here I do attach the gdb output when opening totem first under control of
gdb.
Then with totem running I try to open /dev/video0 which resunlts in a lot of
error messages.
This output is attached here a
Many thanks, seems this fix really cures the bug.
My 'apport' has become unempoyed since then ;-)
--
gvfs-fuse-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235698
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: parallels-modules
I have installed here fully licensed Parallels-Workstation in
Ubuntu-Hardy from the 'partners repository'. It worked fine for me all
the time with kernel 2.6.24-19.
A few days ago there was a recommended kernel update to 2.6.24-21.
As k
Congratulations to Sebastian for the fix!
Hardy-amd64
I upgraded these packages from hardy-proposed::
gvfs-fuse
gvfs
gvfs-backends
and tried all the things which prior lead to the crash, like switching user,
(u)mounting nfs-exports, several reboots, ...
The crash is gone, was unable to get this
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18048761/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18048762/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18048763/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18049524/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18049525/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18049526/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
An easy solution would be to enable the corresponding feature in the
kernel, so one can read the configuration of the running kernel from
/proc/config.gz.
This feature is disabled in the standard Ubuntu kernels, so we face a
hen/egg problem.
--
/boot/config-{uname -r} does not contain correct ke
I was polite before and submitted a feature request to add it again some time
ago - with absolutely zero response.
I can confirm it is a bug, see here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ingo# apt-get install gtk2-engines-spherecrystal
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
good to know, but please consider:
1. this bug was reported for Hardy
2. Hardy LTS will survive Intrepid by far with regard to updates.
So, when does the fix come for Hardy?
--
gvfs-fuse-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235698
You received this
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18094585/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18094586/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18094587/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18095054/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18095055/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18095056/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18326199/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18326200/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18326201/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18342790/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18342791/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18342792/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Before somebody asks:
meanwhile I have de-installed 'nautilus-actions' so that is no longer
responsible
--
gvfs-fuse-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280376
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18372723/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18372724/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18372725/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment ad
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18374309/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18374310/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18374311/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18213810/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18213811/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18213812/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
I just repeated Daniel's procedure and got apport pop-up with the
information filed as Bug #278021
So, seems the fix is not (yet) applied to Hardy?
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug notification because you
Things are even worse:
when opening nautilus with 'gksudo' a device gets mounted, which is in
/etc/fstab, but with 'noauto option'!
(/dev/sdb1 /media/sdb1 ext2 defaults,noatime,noauto 0
2)
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Things are even worse:
when opening nautilus with 'gksudo' a device gets mounted, which is in
/etc/fstab, but with 'noauto option'!
(/dev/sdb1 /media/sdb1 ext2 defaults,noatime,noauto 0
2)
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239380/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239381/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18239382/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
> Please, try to obtain a backtrace
please help with information how to perform that.
These crashes always happen when I just log in to gdm (GNOME desktop).
I.e. when I first log out from gdm, wait a while and then log in again.
Or when I switch users: staying one user logged in, while another use
GER=local/pp:/tmp/.ICE-unix/17932
ALSA lib control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL front:0
ALSA lib control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL front:0
xmodmap: /home/ingo/.Xmodmap:2: bad keysym in remove modifier list
'Caps_Lock', no corresponding keycodes
xmodmap: /home/
sorry, there ist some German output at the end, I do translate:
seahorse: "läuft nicht" -> "does not run"
If I assume that 'DNS' is with respect to 'Domain Name Servisce':
in my private network there is a DHCP service running on my router, but just
for guests an it distributes informaton o
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18298069/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18298070/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18298071/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=nautilus-actions;dist=unstable
So it is either not nautilus-actions, or it is specific to Ubuntu.
Ingo
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269788
You received this bug notification because yo
ither not nautilus-actions, or it is specific to Ubuntu.
Ingo
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Found a quick solution - will call it patch:
just use e2fsprogs 1.41.0 from Debian-Lenny and all is fine - see Output
of handling and correcting
Result see in attached file QNAP-fsck.txt
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Attachment added: "QNAP-fsck.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16712
Found a quick solution - will call it patch:
just use e2fsprogs 1.41.0 from Debian-Lenny and all is fine - see Output
of handling and correcting
Result see in attached file QNAP-fsck.txt
** Attachment added: "QNAP-fsck.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16712071/QNAP-fsck.txt
** Visibility c
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17783180/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17783181/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17783182/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17841621/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17841622/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17841623/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Confirm same behaviour in Thinkpad T41 for Kubuntu 8.04 (all kernels up
to now, i.e. 2.6.24-19-generic). Again, it worked fine on 7.10
--
Thinkpad frreezes when undocking from Ultrabay if CD/DVD-ROM drive has not been
deleted manually
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242638
You received this bug
happened again today just after login, seems it is somting essential!
--
gvfs-fuse-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235698
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Please kill me, if my change in sensors3.conf for it8716 chip
from
compute in3 ((6.8/10)+1)*@ , @/((6.8/10)+1) (orginal
content)
into
compute in3 ((6.8/10)+1)*(@+0.12) , @/((6.8/10)+1)-0.12 (my calibrated
version)
is not according to documentation and is not supposed to res
What value are you expecting and what values are you getting?
if I change
compute in3 ((6.8/10)+1)*@
into
compute in3 ((6.8/10)+1)*(@+0.12)
I expect the displayed voltage to be increased by (0.12*1.68) = 0.2
volts. This is a compensation for the voltage drop on the wiring of the
motherboard.
is for the reverse
calculation only.
Ingo
--
sensors-applet ignores /etc/sensors3.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230850
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15404155/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15404156/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15404157/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
is unable to perform the more difficult calculation correctly as the
version in Feisty did.
So it is definitely a lm-sensors bug or which part of it ever is
responsible for calculations.
Best regards,
Ingo
--
sensors-applet ignores /etc/sensors3.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230850
You
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 235698 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235698
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15415956/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15415957/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment adde
to overcome the precision deficiency.
Best regards,
Ingo
--
sensors-applet ignores /etc/sensors3.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230850
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
package libsensors4 needs update to replace faulty libsensors.so.4.0.0
by libsensors.so.4.0.2
** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
sensors-applet ignores /etc/sensors3.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230850
You received this bug notification becaus
tools
like apcupsd and probably also is faulty.
Please update repository and apt data-base!
Richard, thanks for your patience,
Ingo
--
sensors-applet ignores /etc/sensors3.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230850
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
> libsensors3, which seems to have a habit of naming the sensors
slightly differently than previous version
I can exlude that:
Hardy was a fresh install on an empty partition, no old configuration was
migrated. I did just edit 'sensors3.conf and changed:
original paragraph (regarding voltages):
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Ubuntu-Hardy amd64
Nautilus regularly generates segfaults. Here the relevant lines from
/var/log/messages:
May 17 13:34:42 pp kernel: [ 1950.219647] nautilus[6523]: segfault at 8734
rip 7fba97efaf0f rsp 7fffa34a6590 error 4
May 17 15:47:07
I followed your proposal, but while system was up and running I could
not catch any segfaults. As said, I never observed Nautilus crashing.
I now checked the timestamps in /var/log/messages and found/concluded:
it happend when issuing 'reboot' using the graphical way in the GNOME
panel-applet (d
Additional information:
it happens precisely when I logout from current X-session via the button in
GNOME-panel.
I did check with after a fresh boot absolutely no additional x-applications
started (by me).
It also happens (of course) when I logout from x-session, switch to virtual
terminal 1, l
** Attachment added: "/var/crash/*.crash for above bug, apport enabled"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14624207/_usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14624208/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibra
Right, I have nautilus-actions installed.
The only thing I use it for is with 'wipe-selected-schemas' to securely erase
decrypted files after use.
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232253
You received this bug notification because you a
I have the same configuration (nautilus-actions + wipe-selected-schemas)
running smoothly under Feisty without any complaints/crashes!
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232253
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu-Hardy amd64 (GNOME desktop)
I have installed lm-sensors and corresponding 'sensors-applet' for the
GNOME-Panel.
MB (ASUS M2N-E) contains IT8716F chip controlled by module 'it87'.
The sensors output and readings are configured by /etc/sensors3.conf.
However this confi
I think it finally is a duplicate, difference was just how the actual 'fsck'
routine is called?
You may close it,
Ingo
--
fsck.ext3 crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257049
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ingo# dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdc3
dumpe2fs 1.40.8 (13-Mar-2008)
Filesystem volume name:
Last mounted on:
Filesystem UUID: 2854e675-ba59-4084-b530-759a967b4ac2
Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53
Filesystem revision #:1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features
Probably some other usefull information: trying with an older version
of e2fstools (under openSUSE 10.2) resulted in following error-message
(no crash!):
fsck.ext3 -n /dev/sdc3
e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)
fsck.ext3: Das Gerät oder die Ressource ist belegt beim Versuch,
/dev/sdc3 zu öffnen
Filesyste
an still not be mounted - but that is another story and no reason
to crash e2fsck
If you need prove I'll do copy you mtab or whatever you like to show that it is
NOT mounted!
Ingo
--
e2fsck crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257048
You received this bug noti
So, forgot to mention:
if you want to reproduce the crash, you need a corrupted filesystem like
I have it here.
That neiter e2fsck can repair it - its my fault (don't need the data anyhow)
But that e2fsck in Hardy crashes instead of displaying a message and exits, is
a bug!
The filesystem still
xt3
should not crash when operating on such a 'homebrew ext4'.
I do attach/upload the Outputs from Lenny for the 2 runs of e2fsck here
as 'QNAP-fsck.txt'
Many thanks,
Ingo
P.S.: when my NAS is back, I probably can create such a beast of
filesystem for testing ;-)
** Attachment
If you are interested to have a look at QNAP's sources (should all be under
GPL), please check here:
http://europe.qnap.com/download/Storage/TS-209Pro/
I guess, the sources should be in the last archive on that page (277MB).
If you need more information or upload the images of sdc1 and sdc
8] EXT3-fs: sdc3: couldn't mount because of unsupported
optional features (40).
I already googled for that message, but did not find any usefull info.
Ingo
--
e2fsck crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257048
You received this bug notification because you are a member
: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
Passwort:
pp:/home/ingo# tune2fs -E test_fs /dev/sdc3
tune2fs 1.41.0 (10-Jul-2008)
Setting test filesystem flag
pp:/home/ingo# mount -t ext4dev /dev/sdc3 /mnt
pp:/home/ingo#
---
Great: it mounts and I can smoothly access the data on
x27;s more than
expected!
And as said, I cannot create such a virgin reproducible file system right now
as my box is away for repair.
If you do not want to propose upgrade of e2fsprogs in Hardy, we will have to
wait till I can create an untouched/spoiled filesystem to use for tracing.
Many thanks,
I
what me just came up to check the posssibility of other parts of Hardy
interferring with e2fsck:
I do upload here the broken /var/cash/_usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash
which was createt at the very same time when e2fsck crashed - does it help you
further?
Ingo
** Attachment added
Hi Mario,
with resolutions less than 1280x1024 all was ok (i.e. at 1024x768). But
meanwhile after sebveral updates, ... the problem disappeared. But actually I
do not know which piece was responsible for that effect. My curren usplash.conf
contains
xres=1280
yres=1024
But since some time I nev
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253911
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Still happens after today's (2008-08-01) major 'proposed' GNOME-update on
Hardy 8.04.1
Please fix asap.
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238644
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
I have Nautilus-actions installed.
I cannot decide whether it is a duplicate of bug #182345. But usually apport
does not generate a new bug-report for the same occurrence. This can easily be
seen if you look at /var/crash:
ls -l /var/crash
insgesamt 9288
-rw--- 1 ingo ingo 2651333 2008-06
.
Besides that I also have installed 'libsensors.so.3.1.5' because it is
required by 'apcupsd' which I use as well.
Best regards,
Ingo
--
sensors-applet ignores /etc/sensors3.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230850
You received this bug notification because you are a m
now, we have already kernel 2.6.24-23 in Hardy and a new point release
will be available very soon.
And still NO matching parallels-modules !!!
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Nobody seems to care?
Meanwhile this is causing security issues as the only way to run
Parallels is to downgrade the kernel to 2.6.24-19 or -21.
Therefore I mark it accordingly
** This bug has been flagged as a security issue
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bu
sorry, please correct:
you must downgrade to kernel 2.6.24-19 or even 2.6.24-18
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
I cannot judge on Intrepid, but since Hardy 8.04.2 Ubuntu has silently upgraded
to partimage 0.6.7-1 and all is ok now.
I also can confirm restore of a NTFS partition went smoothly.
Ingo
--
partimage crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300356
You received this bug notification
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17163866/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17163867/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17163868/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Sorry, I could not find any debug-(symbol)files for brasero in the Ubuntu
repositories,
neither brasero-dbg nor brasero-dbgsym.
--
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
had the very same crash this morning just after booting and log-in.
To obtain a backtrace we need the -dbgsym or -dbg packages for 'gfs-fuse'.
They are not available in the Hardy repositories :-(
--
gvfs-fuse-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235
And when will the fix be available in Hardy repository?
Please consider that this bug was reported first for Hardy since 1 year.
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
done, see here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/357634
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17210430/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17210431/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17210432/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17309148/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17309149/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17309150/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
It is still present in Hardy! (kernel 2.6.24-24)
Please consider, Hardy is LTS and with regard to maintainence will
survive even Jaunty.
--
/boot/config-{uname -r} does not contain correct kernel configuration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228380
You received this bug notification because you
> Hopefully, next LTS is soon.
It was opened for Hardy, why is it ignored. Hardy is LTS - does that mean 'Long
Term Suffering'?
Do we have to open a new bug report to get that fixed?
** Changed in: nautilus-actions (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Won't Fix => New
--
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
1 - 100 of 1460 matches
Mail list logo