[Bug 87969] undefined entities in packagingguide -- cron errors

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-docs I dist-upgraded my dapper system (amd64) on Jan 30. Predictably (I'm afraid) there are now scrollkeeper errors in the monthly cron job again. This looks vaguely similar to bug #74555 and #84050 but differs in the specifics. See also #74481 an

[Bug 87969] Re: undefined entities in packagingguide -- cron errors

This was a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy. vnix$ dpkg -l ubuntu-docs Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version

[Bug 89207] Undeclared bashism in dpkg.postinst

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg The use of [^x] in a shell glob is not Bourne-compatible. I only found out because those scripts of my own which had this bashism stopped working on dist-upgrade to Edgy ... To fix this, either (a) change to use [!x], or (b) change /bin/sh to /bin/b

[Bug 25830] Re: Option to display file in browser, treat as text/plain

For the record, the "Open in Browser" extension does this, and gets it exactly right. Why this cannot be implemented natively in Firefox is beyond me, but a workaround and model implementation exists. http://www.spasche.net/mozilla/ The canonical related upstream bug is https://bugzilla.mozilla.o

[Bug 44016] Re: grep: /var/lib/locales/supported.d/*[^~]: No such file or directory

It would seem to me that the script needs to take into account the possibility that /var/lib/locales/supported.d/ is empty. Mine contains "en" and "local", of which "en" is indicated as being installed by "language-pack-en-base" (and I guess "local" gets updated dynamically when you install a langu

[Bug 49222] Re: Screensaver password dialog does not indicate keyboard layout

Simos: When you run sudo, won't the keyboard preference need to be set for the root user as well in order to work as you wish? -- Screensaver password dialog does not indicate keyboard layout https://launchpad.net/bugs/49222 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists

[Bug 93199] Can't submit a bug against gnome-applets

Public bug reported: When trying to report a bug against gnome-applets in Ubuntu (from the package's bugs overview page, ) I get a rather blunt message: gnome-applets does not use Malone as its bug tracker. To report a bug about gnome-applets, ple

[Bug 93199] Re: Can't submit a bug against gnome-applets

(Actually bug #90341 of March 7 is the newest; don't know why I thought #89029 was.) -- Can't submit a bug against gnome-applets https://launchpad.net/bugs/93199 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 93203] Re: "Package: I don't know" radio button fails if package name field non-empty

Sorry, thought I had found a bug in Launchpad which would have prevented this bug from ever being submitted. Never mind, feel free to reject / trash / close / punish. -- "Package: I don't know" radio button fails if package name field non-empty https://launchpad.net/bugs/93203 -- ubuntu-bugs ma

[Bug 93203] "Package: I don't know" radio button fails if package name field non-empty

Public bug reported: Testing, please ignore ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- "Package: I don't know" radio button fails if package name field non-empty https://launchpad.net/bugs/93203 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 61629] Re: SSL stuff in description -- red herring?

Hello? It is still the case that SSL appears to work fine without w3-el (... thank goodness) ... But it also appears that the package description has changed (in Dapper already, in fact) and no longer includes the passage I was complaining about. -- SSL stuff in description -- red herring? http

[Bug 61360] Re: Email message identified as "Bio-Rad .PIC"

Still broken in Edgy -- how about at least getting this forwarded upstream before Feisty+1? I'm not a seasoned magic(5) hacker but I could try to produce a patch if that's what it takes; I imagine moving the detection towards the end of the file might be sufficient. I don't have access to genuine

[Bug 61360] Re: Email message identified as "Bio-Rad .PIC"

I did some googling. has a couple of zip files with bio-rad samples. Like I sort of suspected, typical values for image size are more like 512 x 512 and maybe a dozen images tops in a file; the numbers reported by file(1) above are way outside the typical

[Bug 61360] Re: Email message identified as "Bio-Rad .PIC"

http://web.archive.org/web/20050317223257/www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/ladic/text/biorad.txt has an actual spec. Note in particular the offsets 14 and 62 (per this description, should be either 1 or 0) and the file name buffer at offset 18. The six reserved bytes starting at offset 70 are all zeros in the

[Bug 93500] Wrong Finnish translation in xorg.xml

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xkb-data The Finnish translation for "International (with dead keys)", curiously, means "International (without dead keys)". This is on Dapper, xkb-data 0.8-7ubuntu2 ** Affects: xkeyboard-config (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Uncon

[Bug 61360] Re: Email message identified as "Bio-Rad .PIC"

Hmm, reordering the stuff in the magic file doesn't help at all, and there doesn't seem to be a facility for specifying an AND. Maybe this very vaguely defined magic detection should simply be disabled until perhaps a new version of file(1) allows it to be better specified. -- Email message iden

[Bug 91628] Re: magic data for PowerTab files

A short plain ASCII magic string is prone to produce false positives. Any chance this could be made longer / tighter / more specific? -- magic data for PowerTab files https://launchpad.net/bugs/91628 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi

[Bug 93495] Re: wifi-radar freezes the system

By the looks of the symptoms, I had the same problem with the config file; it had overwritten /etc/wifi-radar.conf with an empty file and then would refuse to run. Curiously, and contrary to what the documentation says, it didn't seem to be able to recreate the file from scratch, so simply removin

[Bug 97328] wifi-radar: --version is bogus

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar vnix$ dpkg -l wifi-radar Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Vers

[Bug 97329] wifi-radar --help

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar Would be nice if at least it reported an invalid option instead of start up a GUI and start spewing errors about access problems with /etc/wifi- radar.conf (when not run as root). ** Affects: wifi-radar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 97333] Re: Zaps /etc/wifi-radar.conf occasionally

Oh and of course, WIBNI it would take more care when overwriting the file with new data. Write to a temp file, move atop the old file only if successful? -- Zaps /etc/wifi-radar.conf occasionally https://launchpad.net/bugs/97333 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://l

[Bug 97333] Zaps /etc/wifi-radar.conf occasionally

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar I am unable to repro this, but it happened to me and the guy in bug #93495. Occasionally /etc/wifi-radar.conf will get overwritten by an empty file. When this happens, you are no longer able to run wifi-radar; you get a cryptic Python error m

[Bug 97337] Long AP names force the dialog to grow; no way to resize back

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar Just for fun, I left wifi-radar open during my morning commute ... (It became unresponsive when it had been running for some ten to twenty minutes. I guess that's not how it's supposed to be used, so not reporting that as a bug.) Some of the

[Bug 97380] wifi-radar.conf(5) installed in man8

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar Manual pages in section 8 are for system administration commands, not configuration files. The "SEE ALSO" in wifi-radar(1) even suggests wifi-radar.conf(5) even though it is currently installed in /usr/share/man/man8 ** Affects: wifi-radar (U

[Bug 97390] wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar The manual page for wifi-radar.conf looks like basically a copy/paste of the wifi-radar manual page. The NAME, SYNOPSIS, FILES, BUGS, and AUTHOR sections look like duplicates; they are mostly redundant here, to the extent that they are not erro

[Bug 97393] Broken link to discussion forum in manual page

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar The manual page directs users to http://www.x1000forums.com/index.php?showforum=8 but this site now appears dead (typical domain-squatter / domain parking page, no forums there). ** Affects: wifi-radar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 97328] Re: wifi-radar: --version is bogus

Looks like debian/rules should make wifi-radar.localized and install that instead of simply grabbing the skeleton with the bogus version number. (Would have been nice, of course, if upstream had named it wifi- radar.in.py or something like that to alert you to the fact that it is not fully built.)

[Bug 97413] Manual page formatting errors

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar The OPTIONS section in the wifi-radar manual page and the EXAMPLE section in the wifi-radar.conf manual page have odd indentation and spurious non-text content: It will always look for the config file in /etc/wifi-radar.conf. Yo

[Bug 97413] Re: Manual page formatting errors

The attached diff implements the following changes: * Remove the "Linux Software for managing WIFI profiles" footer * Trim empty paragraphs in the beginning and straighten out some quirks * Use .PP instead of .PP for regular paragraphs; remove asterisks (presumably put in for emphasis) *

[Bug 97390] Re: wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless

... So, could you bring this upstream, or shall I? -- wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless https://launchpad.net/bugs/97390 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 97390] Re: wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless

Attached please find an overhauled manual page. Diff available on request but it didn't make much sense to diff, because it's basically rewritten. ** Attachment added: "New wifi-radar(5) manual page" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7035366/wifi-radar.conf.5 -- wifi-radar.conf manual page mostl

[Bug 97390] Re: wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless

Oh, and for the record, see also bug #97413 -- wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless https://launchpad.net/bugs/97390 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 97413] Re: Manual page formatting errors

I uploaded a new manual page for wifi-radar.conf to bug #97390 -- Manual page formatting errors https://launchpad.net/bugs/97413 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 97333] Re: Zaps /etc/wifi-radar.conf occasionally

During its use. I believe I may have interrupted it with ctrl-C at some point, or it could have gone sour without my noticing -- hadn't needed it for a while, and only noticed today that the program would no longer work. -- Zaps /etc/wifi-radar.conf occasionally https://launchpad.net/bugs/97333

[Bug 97443] AP name not necessarily valid UTF8

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar Stumbling over an access point with invalid UTF-8 in its name produces this warning: /usr/sbin/wifi-radar:798: PangoWarning: Invalid UTF-8 string passed to pango_layout_set_text() There is no requirement that access point names be valid UTF-8

[Bug 97390] Re: wifi-radar.conf manual page mostly useless

Also notice that there are a couple of FIXME comments and a couple of commented-out parts. I suppose the FIXME comments could be fixed by redirecting to one of the wireless-tools pages for more information. The "channel" setting could be uncommented. I meant to check but forgot. The "signal" se

[Bug 97446] Close button unresponsive when running as non-root

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar I know wifi-radar should be run as root, but it should also be possible to quit if you start it as a regular user by mistake. Currently the Close button doesn't work, although it is possible to force quit with alt-F4 or the window manager's cl

[Bug 97447] Formatting error in GUI

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar Please accept this informal diff. wifi-radar line 849: -self.current_network.set_text( "Connected to %s ip(%s)" % ( current_ssid, current_ip ) ) +self.current_network.set_text( "Connected to %s (IP address %s)" % ( current_ssid, current_ip )

[Bug 97443] Re: AP name not necessarily valid UTF8

http://lists.apple.com/archives/macnetworkprog/2006/Nov/msg00026.html and an informal perusal of the documents via ieee802.org seems to confirm that there is no firm standard on this. (However, bug #27171 would seem to allege that Latin-1 is in fact the standard. I seriously doubt this, though.)

[Bug 97560] Double-clicking on an access point does nothing

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wifi-radar I would have expected double-clicking on an access point in the main dialog to attempt to connect to that network (if it's configured, else configure, then connect). This should not be a very complicated addition to make, should it? ** Affect

[Bug 97413] Re: Manual page formatting errors

The following patch should be applied after the previous one. It cleans up the wpa-supplicant discussion and moves it from the OPTIONS section to the DESCRIPTION. I'm not sure if I have broken the customizations made by the upstream Makefile; I believe it tries to do an in-place replacement of th

[Bug 97413] Re: Manual page formatting errors

Sorry, the previous patch still contained some minor annoyances. )-: Here is a replacement, still to be applied on top of the first patch. ** Attachment added: "Second patch v2, supersedes previous" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7037546/wifi-radar.diff -- Manual page formatting errors https

[Bug 97413] Re: Manual page formatting errors

Finally, this patch adds a description of the GUI. Even though the GUI is mostly self-explanatory, the (gratuitous) color-coding in the "Signal" column is IMHO worth documenting, and I managed to get the rest in there too. I hope the description of the "Close" button and the daemon mode, in parti

[Bug 94392] Broken URL in /etc/firefox/firefoxrc

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox The comments in /etc/firefox/firefoxrc reference bug #29760 but the URL is wrong. For the record, bug #29760 is a flashplugin-nonfree bug, but this file belongs to the Firefox package. No doubt this is a tangential symptom of the classic bug #21

[Bug 29760] Re: Sound does not work properly in Flash in firefox

So what is the status of this now? I have Edgy, flashplugin-nonfree (as far as I can tell, this now installs Flash Player 9), no esound-clients, no ALSA dmix hack, libesd- alsa0 installed automatically (I presume because flashplugin-nonfree Recommends: it, perhaps others too) ... and I still exper

[Bug 29760] Re: Sound does not work properly in Flash in firefox

Yep, I have the backports repo, and the Adobe site displays "You have version 9,0,31,0 installed". -- Sound does not work properly in Flash in firefox https://launchpad.net/bugs/29760 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65656] Re: zenity does not display libnotify message bubble

Reproducible here too, since forever. IIRC I tried to get notifications already under Breezy, but reverted to using regular dialog boxes instead. Now on Edgy I get the alert sign (triangular European "!" traffic sign) and the exact same three assert messages, but no actual message. This particular

[Bug 57099] Re: [Edgy] Sawfish not usable

Sawfish in its default configuration is in fact rather sparse. The middle mouse button should bring up a menu, though. -- [Edgy] Sawfish not usable https://launchpad.net/bugs/57099 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 61054] Re: Show sizes of created partitions

I'm not sure I follow. If you don't know how large the partitions are, and they turn out to be too small, your installation will be botched, automatic or no. (Again, please see the description of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/60511 for an illustration.) All I'm asking for i

[Bug 60511] Re: Creates too small swap for hibernate

I believe I have posted all the information I have available. Do you still need more from me, or could you please remove the "Needs info" tag now? -- Creates too small swap for hibernate https://launchpad.net/bugs/60511 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

[Bug 57284] Re: examples/pbuilder-distribution.sh: Funny shell error

Sorry for failing to mention the version. It appears that pbuilder 0.145ubuntu4.1 was current in Dapper when I reported the bug. -- examples/pbuilder-distribution.sh: Funny shell error https://launchpad.net/bugs/57284 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

[Bug 60512] Re: Timezone picker crash on double-click on slow system

I posted the info you requested; do you need anything more from me? -- Timezone picker crash on double-click on slow system https://launchpad.net/bugs/60512 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 60516] Re: Time zone & locale should also affect Gnome time applet 12/24 preference

This bug is still tagged "Needs Info" -- do you need something from me still? -- Time zone & locale should also affect Gnome time applet 12/24 preference https://launchpad.net/bugs/60516 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu

[Bug 60511] Re: Creates too small swap for hibernate

Could we at least have a fix for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/61054 then? Or maybe (/me goes haywire) an animated high-resolution full-color graphical 3D wizard with 19 steps to select whether you want one or the other, with no way to cancel and no way to operate it from the

[Bug 57035] Re: uninstallable: 'rep' manpage is also in librep9.deb

Just for emphasis and clarification, librep9 in Edgy should IMHO deserve an update with Conflicts: rep (<= [whatever is in Dapper]) in order to solve the dist-upgrade problem. I'm not sure how this should be addressed, as this issue is not a security problem, but I hope there is a way to get stuff

[Bug 57035] Re: uninstallable: 'rep' manpage is also in librep9.deb

Please fix this in Edgy too, as it prevents a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy if you have rep installed. ** Changed in: librep (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- uninstallable: 'rep' manpage is also in librep9.deb https://launchpad.net/bugs/57035 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 71915] Re: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

I had this too. The offending package was xli and it's reported in bug #57035 -- subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/71915 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 70382] Re: x11-common update breaks because of xli files in /usr/X11R6/bin

This prevents a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy. Is it possible to make an update to Dapper with Conflicts: x11-common (>=nnn) where "nnn" stands for the version where /usr/X11R6/bin was removed? I'm thinking the fix should actually go the other way around, with a high-priority fix for x11-commo

[Bug 71915] Re: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

Sorry (slaps self), that one is vaguely related, but I meant to paste in a link to bug #70382 and also now discovered bug #67996 which is even more to the point. -- subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/71915 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 67996] Re: x11-common preinst script fails (was: aborts /usr/X11R6/bin not empty)

Upgrading from Dapper to Edgy is prevented by any package which has stuff in /usr/X11R6/bin in Dapper. IMHO there should be an update to Edgy where x11-common is marked as being in conflict with the Dapper version of all offending packages. Any chance to implement that? See also bug #70382 and bu

[Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

I just went through a relatively nightmarish dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy. Unfortunately, I was unable to capture the exact message which scrolled by -- the significance of it was unclear to me at the time -- but during the dist-upgrade, there was a message to the effect that I had duplicate U

[Bug 62195] Re: edgy update-grub destroys kopt

Also found out about bug #6 while Googling around. For the record, my /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf contains a single line, just "DEVICE partitions". Er, ahem, tap tap tap, is this thing on, should I submit a separate bug report? -- edgy update-grub destroys kopt https://launchpad.net/bugs/62195 --

[Bug 82468] dash doesn't understand the function keyword

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dash Not sure if this is properly a POSIX conformance bug, but all of my shell scripts where I have used "function fnord { ... }" stopped working after I upgraded to Edgy. Turns out dash does have functions, but it only understands the "fnord () { ... }"

[Bug 83125] FTBFS: debian/rules: whitespace issue in POD rules

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: equivs The rules for buliding the POD seemed to hang on Ubuntu 6.06. Turns out the whitespace was somehow eaten up so that pod2man sat there waiting for input on standard input. Steps to repro: vnix$ apt-get source equivs vnix$ cd equivs-2.0.6 vnix$ dpkg

[Bug 83125] Re: FTBFS: debian/rules: whitespace issue in POD rules

I'm not at all sure this is a problem in Ubuntu specifically but I figured this should have been reported in the Debian BTS by now if it was an issue ... ** Attachment added: "patch for debian/rules" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6176977/ftbfs.patch -- FTBFS: debian/rules: whitespace issue

[Bug 70382] Re: x11-common update breaks because of xli files in /usr/X11R6/bin

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 67996 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 67996 x11-common preinst script fails (was: aborts /usr/X11R6/bin not empty) -- x11-common update breaks because of xli files in /usr/X11R6/bin https://launchpad.net/bugs/70382 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 63011] Re: opera breaks dapper->eft upgrade

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 67996 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 67996 x11-common preinst script fails (was: aborts /usr/X11R6/bin not empty) -- opera breaks dapper->eft upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/63011 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 67029] Re: x11-common complains about /usr/bin/X11/ being used by Opera

If you really mean /usr/bin/X11R6 then this is a duplicate of bug #67996 -- x11-common complains about /usr/bin/X11/ being used by Opera https://launchpad.net/bugs/67029 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 71915] Re: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 67996 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 67996 x11-common preinst script fails (was: aborts /usr/X11R6/bin not empty) -- subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/71915 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 67996] Re: x11-common preinst script fails (was: aborts /usr/X11R6/bin not empty)

Actually, since you can't know which packages in multiverse and what not might still have spurious files in /usr/X11R6/bin it's probably better to go with the suggestion in comment #6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/67996/comments/6 In other words, installation should not fail;

[Bug 83692] /usr/share/man/man1/c++.1.gz is a dangling symlink

Public bug reported: I'm not sure which package is responsible for this, but after I did a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy, I received (started receiving, I expect) the following from cron.daily: /etc/cron.daily/man-db: mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/c++.1.gz is a dangling symlink The syml

[Bug 83692] Re: /usr/share/man/man1/c++.1.gz is a dangling symlink

Turns out apt-file was barocquen too. Not investigating that any further. As expected, g++ provides usr/share/man/man1/g++.1.gz ... other packages which at a glance look like they might be interested in providing an alternative (aspectc++, gcc-avr, mingw32, manpages-ja [sic]) are not familiar or us

[Bug 519260] Re: package xemacs21 21.4.22-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zur?ck

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 467446 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467446 Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.gz: > update-alternatives: error: Alternativen-Pfad /usr/bin/xemacs21 existiert > nicht This is a know -- albeit not yet properly analyzed -- problem; marking as a duplic

[Bug 117757] Re: Cannot view exported SVG in Firefox

When you link to an image from an HTML document, are these on a server somewhere or on your local hard drive? The logic for determining file types is different for local files (this is why people include http- equiv meta tags in HTML documents) than for served files, whose type in turn also depend

[Bug 569270] Re: package xemacs21-mule 21.4.22-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

The error messages in the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt seem to implicate the slime package as the culprit. Reassigning accordingly. ** Package changed: xemacs21 (Ubuntu) => slime (Ubuntu) -- package xemacs21-mule 21.4.22-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installatio

[Bug 568923] Re: package emacs23 23.1+1-4ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: подпроц есс установлен сценари й post-installation возвратил к од ошибки 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531 The error messages in the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt seem to implicate ecb. Reassigning accordingly. ** Package changed: emacs23 (Ubuntu) => ecb (Ubuntu) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 466

[Bug 573602] Re: package emacs23 23.1 1-4ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt: > In toplevel form: > sepia-w3m.el:37:13:Error: Emacs-w3m of this version does not support Emacs > 23; try the > development version > Wrote /usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp/sepia/sepia.elc > Wrote /usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp/sepia/snippet.elc > emacs-install

[Bug 572336] Re: package xemacs21-mule 21.4.22-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 515630 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515630 I don't read Japanese but the messages in the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz seem to indicate slime as the culprit. Reassigning accordingly. ** Package changed: xemacs21 (Ubuntu) => slime (Ubuntu) ** T

[Bug 543191] Re: package slime 1:20090616-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 478418 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478418 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 478418 slime: Required feature arc-mode was not provided (xemacs21) -- package slime 1:20090616-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-insta

[Bug 569270] Re: package xemacs21-mule 21.4.22-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 478418 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478418 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 478418 slime: Required feature arc-mode was not provided (xemacs21) -- package xemacs21-mule 21.4.22-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installe

[Bug 577505] Re: package emacspeak 29.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 491101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491101 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 491101 /usr/bin/emacspeak.emacs{22,23,-snapshot} doesn't exist -- package emacspeak 29.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation

[Bug 558925] Re: package emacspeak 29.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス in stalled post-installation script はエラ ー終了ステータス 2 を返しまし た

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 491101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491101 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 491101 /usr/bin/emacspeak.emacs{22,23,-snapshot} doesn't exist -- package emacspeak 29.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス installed post-installation scr

[Bug 577505] Re: package emacspeak 29.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 491101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491101 Thank you for your bug report. However, this problem had already been reported, so your bug report has been marked as a duplicate of the existing report. Furthermore, the problem appears to be fixed in the l

[Bug 558925] Re: package emacspeak 29.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス in stalled post-installation script はエラ ー終了ステータス 2 を返しまし た

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 491101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491101 Thank you for your bug report. However, this problem had already been reported, so your bug report has been marked as a duplicate of the existing report. Furthermore, the problem appears to be fixed in the l

[Bug 162954] Re: void variable with ctypes.el

I'll mark it as "Fix Committed" for now. ** Changed in: emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- void variable with ctypes.el https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 391188] Re: CWEB major mode does not work under Emacs

The version in Lucid should most certainly no longer have this bug. Marking as Fix Released. The linked Debian bug task has morphed into an unrelated problem and should in theory be removed, but I don't think I can do that. ** Changed in: emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fi

[Bug 272810] Re: package emacs-snapshot 1:20080919-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Jack Moffitt: can you still reproduce your problem? If so, please file a separate bug report. I think the emacs-snapshot task for this bug should simply be closed as Invalid. -- package emacs-snapshot 1:20080919-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error ex

[Bug 279775] Re: Screensaver activates in spite of activity in Virtualbox window

dhughes: The upstream bug says this particular problem was fixed in 3.1.2. If you have a slightly different problem in 3.1.6, you should probably file a separate bug report. Also I don't think I understand your problem description, are there some words missing? -- Screensaver activates in spite

[Bug 375042] Re: update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv exists during rc.d purge

** Summary changed: - package virtualbox-ose None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 + update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv exists during rc.d purge -- update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv exists during rc.d purge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37504

[Bug 485298] Re: I have installed Ubuntu 9.10 and I have no sound and I have problems with Firefox

** Package changed: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- I have installed Ubuntu 9.10 and I have no sound and I have problems with Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 420501] Re: Synaptic Package manager remove process is crashes when try select packege for remove, install and upgrade.

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 375042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375042 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 375042 update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv exists during rc.d purge -- Synaptic Package manager remove process is crashes when try select packege for remove, i

[Bug 317798] Re: Synaptic crashes on removing VirtualBox-ose

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 375042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375042 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 375042 update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv exists during rc.d purge -- Synaptic crashes on removing VirtualBox-ose https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317798 You re

[Bug 463476] Re: package emacs-snapshot 1:20090909-1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zur?ck

Thank you for the update. Reassigning to the package gtk-doc-tools, as that appears to be the culprit here. ** Package changed: emacs-snapshot (Ubuntu) => gtk-doc (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gtk-doc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- package emacs-snapshot 1:20090909-1 failed to install/

[Bug 413110] Re: apport emacs bugs should include failed byte-compilation logs

>From the bzr branch: >if report['Package'] in ['emacs22', 'emacs23', 'emacs-snapshot']: Although I don't have any experience with xemacs, I'm wondering if it shouldn't be included here just like the other emacsen, for completeness if nothing else. -- apport emacs bugs should include fai

[Bug 413110] Re: apport emacs bugs should include failed byte-compilation logs

Oh, and by the by, that probably requires the regex a few lines down to be updated a bit as well. Thanks for your work on this, it's much appreciated! -- apport emacs bugs should include failed byte-compilation logs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413110 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 485290] Re: Emacs23 installation trouble with w3m-snapshot.el

Quoting the attachment DpkgTerminalLog.txt.gz: > install/w3m-el-snapshot: byte-compiling for emacs23, logged in > /tmp/elc.CYPSAskr3Dpc If you still have this file on your system, could you please attach it to this bug report via the web interface at

[Bug 485290] Re: Emacs23 installation trouble with w3m-snapshot.el

eword-encode is provided by the flim package. It's currently in Recommends: but should perhaps be upgraded, as apparently you cannot install w3m-el-snapshot without flim. @hiro: Did you install w3m-snapshot-el with --without-recommends? Otherwise, it should have been pulled in by the dependencies

[Bug 460892] Re: emacs version 23.1+1-4ubuntu2+22.2+0ubuntu6 depends on emacs22

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 462936 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462936 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 433397 FFe for emacs23 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 462936 emacs package is version 23 but depends on the older version emacs22 -- emacs ve

[Bug 462936] Re: emacs package is version 23 but depends on the older version emacs22

Confirmed from duplicates etc. Will update description. ** Package changed: emacs23 (Ubuntu) => emacs22 (Ubuntu) -- emacs package is version 23 but depends on the older version emacs22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 462936] Re: emacs package is version 23 but depends on the older version emacs22

(Quoting Launchpad:) 'emacs' is a binary package. This bug has been assigned to its source package 'emacs22' instead. The bug supervisor for emacs22 (Ubuntu) has been subscribed to this bug. ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Description changed: Binary packag

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >