[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error

2009-05-24 Thread emarkay
"Hello mrwizer, it seems that you're using wodim, could you please try to burn with growisofs (remove wodim) and test again? that could be the cause of the problem, thanks!." I am getting this error also - how do I do the above? I confirmed that there are no MD5 entries in Gconf-Editor > Apps >

[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error

2009-05-24 Thread emarkay
Also see: "Solution to checksum error and md5 sum error in Brasero, K3B and other burning software" http://www.zyxware.com/articles/615/solution-to-checksum-error-and-md5-sum-error-in-brasero-k3b-and-other-burning- software Still not a unified solution but may indicate a problem. -- Brasero Ch

Re: [Bug 285603] Re: MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first

2009-04-30 Thread emarkay
Adam Niedling wrote: > emarkay: I think this bug is about the possible problems when people > with Ati video cards are upgrading from Intrepid to Jaunty. But maybe it > should be repoorted as a separate bug that the new ati driver is > freezing when using 3d apps. > Yea - I

[Bug 369621] Re: ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid

2009-04-30 Thread emarkay
** Description changed: Tried both the native 9.04 drivers, then removed them as shown here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 and then installed the latest ATI/AMD driver from here: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.

[Bug 285603] Re: MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first

2009-04-30 Thread emarkay
sorry - I replied to an email forgetting it posts, too - ignore this dupe post - the new bug report is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/369621 -- MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first h

[Bug 369621] Re: ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid

2009-05-01 Thread emarkay
I reinstalled 9.04 completely and was not able to reproduce this condition, and was able to get a satisfactory display - GLXGEARS running at over 1000 FPS. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36962

[Bug 273558] Re: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid

2009-05-02 Thread emarkay
This may be a dupe - or that one is a dupe to this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323745 Confirming that the developers of third party programs need to change their code? If so, is the "1" version a "Drop-in" for the ")" and all they have to do is rename their link in their code? Regardless I

[Bug 285603] Re: MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first

2009-04-29 Thread emarkay
Folks, this bug is logged in for 8.10 Intrepid. There's (apparently) a new set of issues that MAY be related, but IMHO need another bug report for 9.04 Jaunty. See details here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1133931 Can anyone confirm that this is a separate issue? -- MASTER: xserver

[Bug 369621] [NEW] ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid

2009-04-29 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Tried both the native 9.04 drivers, then removed them as shown here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 and then installed the latest ATI/AMD driver from here: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.2&lang=Engli

[Bug 344879] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3

2009-03-18 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: I did not see the bug report automatiaclly generated - I am just filing this in case it's not s a dupe - if so - sorry ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 Nonfree

[Bug 344879] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3

2009-03-18 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050663/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050664/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050665/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 344879] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3

2009-03-18 Thread emarkay
This was based on a "Crash Report". -- package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 267376] Re: [intrepid] Package OpenOffice.org 3.0 for Backports

2009-03-08 Thread emarkay
Therefore - what it the procedure to get OO3.X into Intrepid, for those that want it. We know it's not officially supported, but want it, and would like to have the "best" suggestions from the "source". This site seems to be the "top of the pile" in regarding the process , FWIW http://news.softpe

[Bug 339450] Re: Problems with bookmarks in Firefox 3.0.7

2009-03-08 Thread emarkay
I think I have the same issue. I just noticed that some bookmarks I added are not being stored in "unsorted bookmarks" and therefore they disappear when i reload a new FF session? I thought I was being forgetful, but I just checked this. This seems to be happening only recently - maybe since 3.0.7

[Bug 347735] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2009-03-23 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: I get an error 17 on the 2.6.17-7 Linux Generic, when updating the "Live USB" that is created when I "Make USB Startup Disk". I thought it was because I wasn't allocating enough disk space but I gave it a persistent 10 gigs, and it still seems to be happening. This will be t

[Bug 347735] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2009-03-23 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298829/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298830/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298831/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 347735] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2009-03-24 Thread emarkay
The Package manager "gear" icon is always there when I am running this USB disk, but there is no update available when i check, and EVERY method I can think of from Synaptic, to "apt-get autoclean" and even enabling backports and cleaning out residual packages, that one xxx.x.xx.x.x.7 kernel item

[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed

2009-04-05 Thread emarkay
Tim Waugh, curious as to what this is? I thought Ubuntu was Debian based or is CUPS a Fedora based application, or what? Thanks. -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 350575] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3

2009-03-28 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Updating to 9.04 and doing 3-way merge (experimental)... Remove that option if it doesn't work!! ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 MachineType: Dell Inc.

[Bug 350575] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3

2009-03-28 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464655/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464656/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464657/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed

2009-03-30 Thread emarkay
Now this is elementary - if something is WRITING the data to a location , then something can ERASE data from that location. Having any sort of history that is unremovable (even with "under the hood tinkering" could preclude Ubuntu from ever being used in a secure or restricted environment. I cons

[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed

2009-03-30 Thread emarkay
This MAY have something to do with the CUPS Printing system interface: http://127.0.0.1:631/ as I can see teh jobs there, too, but can not clear or cancel them. -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 352032] [NEW] Beta Testers need complete info on new/changed features

2009-03-30 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: For those not in the development loop, or the alpha testing, the Beta Technical Overview page needs to be more comprehensive: http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta For example, how can I be a Beta Tester of 9.04 if I am both unsure what a new feature does and what the te

[Bug 352035] [NEW] Fundamental flaw in "Update Manager"

2009-03-30 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Open it and it says, EVERY TIME at the top: "Your system is up to date" However, if I click "Check" and enter my password, 70% of the time I get some updates. How about if the default become: "Your system appears to be up to date, but cli

[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed

2009-03-30 Thread emarkay
Thanks Eric, now how to clear the remaining 46 job data - Like I said, this is a SECURITY issue - will someone ensure this is flagged as such? -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 35009] Re: Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated

2009-03-30 Thread emarkay
>From Duplicate #352035: "Open it and it says, EVERY TIME at the top: "Your system is up to date" However, if I click "Check" and enter my password, 70% of the time I get some updates. How about if the default become: "Your system appears to be up to date, but click the "Check" button to confirm

[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch CSE breaks l18n+setfocus+images+cached+I'm feeling lucky functionality and "violates user trust"

2009-08-17 Thread emarkay
What ever happened to the users? (Where's TRON when we need him?) Anything that sends information OUT of my computer that I have not pre- authorized is in violation of many privacy policies, regardless of the aggregate. Yes, I am aware of much that goes out (IP address for one), most necessary, som

[Bug 81208] Re: LiveCD 6.06.1 requires big download to update

2007-01-23 Thread emarkay
While it's not a "bug" in the classical sense, the developers and other 'gurus' there need to know that having to do a 140MB ADDITIONAL download on EVERY "new" install (for the new O.O. version, security and library updates, and any other additions since August, '06) both sucks YOUR bandwidth, and

[Bug 516412] Re: Pressing causes X to freeze

2010-02-09 Thread emarkay
FWIW it happens with both ATI (HD2600) and NVIDIA (FX1500M) graphics here. -- Pressing causes X to freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon

2010-05-06 Thread emarkay
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon

2010-05-06 Thread emarkay
Still using the following hardware configuration: "2.8 G/2G RAM/ATI HD2600,512VRAM/SIS AC97 OB Audio" Tested this morning with current Karmic and Lucid releases, at 32, 64, 256 & 512 Aperture settings as well as current "Live CD" of Lucid and had no problem booting, getting into the "X" GUI, or o

[Bug 134672] Re: installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work

2010-02-17 Thread emarkay
This appears to still be a valid issue. Curious to see if this could be investigated before release of Lucid? -- installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 134672] Re: installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work

2010-02-17 Thread emarkay
Addition to prior comment - the note in #4 should be added in some manner to the documentation of this plugin , possibly here? : https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-launchpad-plugin/0.4 Also, the maintainers of this package's URL appears to be dead. http://www.alveonet.org -- installi

[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.

2010-01-06 Thread emarkay
Can we get this marked as NOT "Invalid" and "Low" priority?? -- Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2010-01-24 Thread emarkay
2 different Fujitsu MHY2160BH drives affected here. OK so who's going to elevate the priority on this one - over a hundred affected users here... ;) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 493685] Re: Disk has many bad sectors

2010-01-24 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 438136 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 438136 palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- Disk has many bad sectors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493685 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 413673] Re: Palimpsest disk utility is annoying

2010-01-24 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 438136 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 438136 palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- Palimpsest disk utility is annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413673 You received this bug notification

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2010-01-24 Thread emarkay
Duplicate bug reported and found this info - no resolution as of now, although I am updating the Karmic Laptop before doing further debugging. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-220231.html -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You receive

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2010-01-24 Thread emarkay
Contrary to statement: "The upstream fix is in karmic. Changed in libatasmart (Ubuntu): status: New → Fix Released " In marked duplicate bug, this issue is still affecting Karmic as of today's updates on a new install. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/413673 --

[Bug 509729] [NEW] LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default.

2010-01-19 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups CUPS is not loaded, and it is not possible to print. When selecting "System>Administration>Printing", there is no option to add new printer (It is grayed out). Also, see attachment for inconsistency in wording in help screen; there is no "System>Ad

[Bug 509729] Re: LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default.

2010-01-19 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "Screencapture details." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38092872/Screenshot.png -- LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 425394] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

2010-03-02 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 518891 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518891 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 518891 nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() https://bugs.laun

[Bug 387184] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

2010-03-02 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 518891 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518891 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 518891 nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() https://bugs.laun

[Bug 518891] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

2010-03-02 Thread emarkay
Just a "FYI" post - Lucid, Nautilus crash while copying files, Apport triggered, many dupes found. Other bugs with same title - some marked as duplicate here, some duplicated elsewhere. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/439694 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nauti

[Bug 481413] Re: KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.

2009-11-25 Thread emarkay
The crashes were submitted automatically to Mozilla. I have since reformatted and reinstalled Karmic, and now using only the Ubuntu supplied FF3.5.x, I am still getting this. There is much online talk about Karmic/FF/Flash issues, and even though I haveNoScript and FlashBlock, I am still affected,

[Bug 481413] Re: KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.

2009-11-25 Thread emarkay
Micah, accepting my COC, ahem: "bovine fecal matter!" I do NOT get ANY Ubuntu indication or ANY Firefox indication - it just goes INSTANTLY to the desktop; no notes, no crash indication no bells or whistles except the occasional Firefox "oops we are embarassed... do you want to start a new se

[Bug 481413] Re: KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.

2009-11-25 Thread emarkay
Micah, OK, tell me what did "your" Apport tell you about the crashes this morning, yesterday, the day before, as well as all those that happened wewn I submitted this report, as well as the other users here, and on the forums with thje same issue... You are not showing integrity and proactivity,

[Bug 481413] [NEW] KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.

2009-11-12 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 This is in a reformat install, nothing changed but the usual suite of add-ons: "AskForSanitize, BetterPrivacy, FireFTP, FlashBlock, ImageZoom, NoScript, ReloadEvery, take me to this URL, Littlefox and OpenDNS for Firefox." It is not a Flash

[Bug 512268] Re: systray.py crashed with SIGSEGV

2010-04-08 Thread emarkay
Concur with comments above. Lucid only. Consistently appears immediately on boot, yet causes no evident problems. I have a hp psc-1350 printer, which is rarely powered on at boot. -- systray.py crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512268 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 439694] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

2010-04-17 Thread emarkay
Crashed while copying 4 directories on 2 disks - yea that's multitasking, but... - did I loose any data Also see this Forum post for info on unmarked duplicates and more info: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1456604 -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

[Bug 295199] Re: system-config-samba.py crashed with KeyError in getSection()

2010-04-17 Thread emarkay
Another Samba issue - in Lucid? Naw, it just works... Well, not really... :) How do I attach the Apport automatically generated data? -- system-config-samba.py crashed with KeyError in getSection() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295199 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 555158] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()

2010-04-05 Thread emarkay
I also just got an Apport created bug on this. Let me know if any of the data it collected is needed. -- glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program

2010-05-19 Thread emarkay
It is STILL not functioning, even in Lucid with version 2.5.2! One would think that the ONLY Linux Video editor [that used] to]have this feature would ensure that this useful and "modern" feature would be fixed by now! Alessio Treglia, I have returned this to "Confirmed". ** Changed in: avidemux

[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program

2010-05-19 Thread emarkay
Also, it may not now always crash the program, but it's still missing and there is no legit workaround. See: http://avidemux.org/admForum/viewtopic.php?pid=43849# -- Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461350 You received this b

[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program

2010-05-19 Thread emarkay
Also, the newest version (via GetDeb) 2.5.3 still crashes as originally submitted. "Segfault at line 0, file ??ADM_backTrack sig_segfault_handler(int) [0x259400] CONFcouple::lookupName(char const*) CONFcouple::getCouple(char const*, unsigned int*) ADMVideoPartial::ADMVideoPartial(AVDMGenericVideo

[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program

2010-06-10 Thread emarkay
Returned to Complete - I am not Alpha testing Maverick, and will not update to it when it is released. This does however affect Lucid which is a LTS as well as Karmic, both which are still active products and are affected by this bug. I also have confirmed that this is also an issue in the late

[Bug 593352] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-06-13 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Darn launchpad "Timed Out" again. Will someone PLEASE address this! Anyway, "Yea, what I said before... G!" Second time I tried to make a boot USB with "Create Startup Disk" in an updated Lucid. This is a 16GB USB with 4GB persistence. Will get more data as available.

[Bug 593352] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-06-13 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272557/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272558/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272559/ArecordDevices.txt

[Bug 593352] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-06-13 Thread emarkay
Upon rebooting I get" "Kernel Panic. Not synching VFS. Unable to mount root on unknown block (8,1)" and the a hang. This happens when I update the USB install with "Update manager". I did the same thing last night, and the same result this morning on a completely "erased" USB stick. I get a me

[Bug 548415] [NEW] Shutdown timer no longer appears

2010-03-25 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gshutdown The former 60 second timeout to autoshutdown Ubuntu has apparently been removed. I do not recall this noted as an upcoming change to the OS. If this is intended, please confirm, and if not please investigate. This is in an updated Lucid Beta 1

[Bug 495726] Re: CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid

2010-01-28 Thread emarkay
Why is this bug marked "incomplete"? What more information is needed? Why has an importance/priority not been assigned? Being unable to print anything is a rather serious problem - even for an Alpha release. -- CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495726

[Bug 513938] [NEW] LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel

2010-01-28 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: In all versions, including the initial Lucid Alpha 2, one could click on the "Home Folder" icon in "Places" and move it to a Panel, then release the mouse to place a "shortcut" there. This is now not possible. See attachment to see intended operation. ** Affects: gnome-deskt

[Bug 513938] Re: LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel

2010-01-28 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "Screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38502796/Screenshot.jpeg -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 513938] Re: LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel

2010-01-28 Thread emarkay
Acceptable workaround found, but still interested in why it was changed. "Open your home folder. Then from there drag the folder button to the top panel." -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 513938] Re: LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel

2010-01-28 Thread emarkay
Acceptable workaround found, but still interested in why it was changed. "Open your home folder. Then from there drag the folder button to the top panel." -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 495726] Re: CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid

2010-01-28 Thread emarkay
ls -l /etc/rc*/*cups* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc0.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc1.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc2.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15

[Bug 516412] Re: Pressing causes X to freeze

2010-02-12 Thread emarkay
The last 4 posts are after "Fix Released", are still affected with the same issue. Thus is it safe to conclude that the released fix does not completely solve this problem? FWIW, I have Plymouth removed for now. -- Pressing causes X to freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516412 You receiv

[Bug 498607] Re: [lucid] unable to shutdown

2010-02-14 Thread emarkay
I get periodic partial closing - exits "X" and then hangs on a line (something like error 15 - I will document next time it happens). No recourse but to power off manually. This happens on 2 different machines - and yes I have uninstalled Plymouth. -- [lucid] unable to shutdown https://bugs.lau

[Bug 447426] Re: Crash report of indicator-users-service

2010-02-15 Thread emarkay
Apport triggered this Crash Report, and I presume this bug is pertaining to this. Apport "collected complete information about this crash" and should, apparently attach this to this report. (Did it??) I have seen this a few times recently and after todays Ludid update figured I should report

[Bug 205919] Re: Brasero and nautilus-cd-burner cannot burn 4GiB file to DVD

2010-02-15 Thread emarkay
No action since May 2009. What is the status on this in Lucid? -- Brasero and nautilus-cd-burner cannot burn 4GiB file to DVD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 280395] Re: Synaptics "quick search" and "search button" conflict

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
Agreed. For reference, a Ubuntu Forum post: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9004526 Suggest merging the other similar bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/412526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/269361 https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/299076 -- Synaptics "quic

[Bug 525295] Re: Lucid indicator icons are not shown. Displays the "unknown icon" instead

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
Can't mark the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-applet/+bug/543592 as a duplicate, but it is, and that one is now invalid. -- Lucid indicator icons are not shown. Displays the "unknown icon" instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525295 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 543336] Re: "Mail" icon won't disappear

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543592 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543592 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543592 Volume icon disappears when "Envelope" is removed -- "Mail" icon won't disappear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543336 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 543673] [NEW] Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
iS SI7012] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: emarkay1211 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'SI7012'/'SiS SI7012 wi

[Bug 543673] Re: Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545936/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545937/ArecordDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545938/BootDmesg.txt **

[Bug 543673] Re: Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
May be "same-but-different" as new Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/543580 so I did not mark that one as a Dupe. -- Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 134672] Re: installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
Looks like "Incomplete" is not correct - it's a Documentation issue, not a bug. Brian, agree? -- installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 452218] Re: Recovery Menu-"NTP Server NTP" message appears corrupting menu screen

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
FWIW I still see this as of today. Also - seeing this [unrelated] bug, I believe that this is a Kernel issue .https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/543673 I am not able to assign this to "linux (Ubuntu)" Regardless, Brian, I apologize for not doing the research when this was submit

[Bug 526290] Re: Thunderbird 3 hyperlinks broken

2010-03-21 Thread emarkay
>From http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9006611: "Thunderbird-gnome-support" wasn't installed. (Now I know to do this in the future on any reinstall of Thunderbird - All new installs need to have this added.) But installing it does nothing, until you again reinstall Thunderbird3. (Luckil

[Bug 543673] Re: Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work

2010-03-22 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543580 Recovery mode in lucid fails to load recovery menu -- Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543673 You

[Bug 543580] Re: Recovery mode in lucid fails to load recovery menu

2010-03-22 Thread emarkay
Marked my bug a dupe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/543673 -- Recovery mode in lucid fails to load recovery menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bug

[Bug 444824] [NEW] AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon

2009-10-06 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd In a 2.94 Ghz Celeron with the ATI/AMD Radeon 2600XT AGP8X card (This card is still supported by ATI), Mfg. is: "ati2mag_RV630,PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9586" To boot into live CD or installed Karmic Beta, the BIOS setting of "AGP Aper

[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon

2009-10-06 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33191273/Xorg.0.log -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon

2009-10-06 Thread emarkay
Tormod, this is before the "Restricted Driver" is loaded; on a fresh install or any Live CD. -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon

2009-10-06 Thread emarkay
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33191250/Xorg.0.log.old -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 445654] [NEW] Possible confusion between "Update" and "Upgrade"

2009-10-07 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I know this is trivial, but as I see it, "Updates" update the Repo/Sources list, whereas "Upgrades" actually add, replace or delete apps/packages. Therefore shouldn't it be called "Upgrade Manager"? This could be transparent - leave all t

[Bug 35009] Re: Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Where are we on this? Has this been addressed for "Karmic"? -- Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 446483] Re: Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Oops, this is a "Karmic" 9.10 only issue. -- Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 446483] [NEW] Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Public bug reported: #'ing out the entire line still leaves the Throbber page for a bit before going to the login screen - the pre-"X" stuff is still obscured. This is not how Jaunty appeared, and I want to see the boot process code as long as possible without having to look at logs and all tha

[Bug 444395] Re: 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text)

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Is this an AGP card? If so, see if setting the AGP aperture to 255Mb or greater in your BIOS helps. -- 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 446371] Re: Audio not working

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Unfortunately suggest a clean install to ensure no conflicts, but still can you get the type of hardware/software found in your system for the Audio? If you use Windows you can get that from "System Information" . In Ubuntu you realy need a package like "Sysinfo" - it's in the repositories. L

[Bug 446292] Re: grub under karmic sets up wrong boot situation

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
I see 2.6.28-15 as a Jaunty Kernel. 2.6.31-x is the Karmic kernel. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicKoala/TechnicalOverview Did you do a upgrade or a new install? Did you see any "Partial Update/Upgrade" warnings? Suggest a fresh new install. If you have the disk space you can run the Karmic beta

[Bug 446370] Re: instaling update ?

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
This could be a specific error due to a daily update. Does this still happen after an update? Similar but not exact problem here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1256554 See also this Bug for possible dupe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/445077 -- instaling updat

[Bug 445077] Re: package tzdata 2009n-0ubuntu0.9.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
After a Update/upgrade do you still get this error? Similar but not exact problem here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1256554 See also this Bug for possible dupes. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/446370 -- package tzdata 2009n-0ubuntu0.9.04 failed to install/upgr

[Bug 446208] Re: 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text)

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 444395 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444395 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 444395 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) -- 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446208 You

[Bug 444395] Re: 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text)

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
This same bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/446208 was marked as duplicate of this one. -- 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 446206] Re: (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Software Center

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Confirmed. One in "Applications" the other in "Administration". Suggest this be marked as "Invalid"; This is as intended for temporary testing. ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Sof

[Bug 445313] Re: After recent update unable to boot into karmic

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 439784 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439784 Why is Jaunty (9.04) info attached on a Karmic (9.10) bug? This appears to duplicate this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/439784 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 439

[Bug 437429] Re: Cannot prevent login sound

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
Another vote for NOT having this enabled by default - it should fall in the "Startup Sounds" category. Wouldn't it just be a simple task to remove it in the code where it is now and then add it to where the "Startup Sounds" preferences work? There is no reason for this - libraries and late nigh

[Bug 446483] Re: Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2

2009-10-08 Thread emarkay
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 439284 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439284 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 439284 Please allow for an easy way to disable xsplash -- Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

  1   2   3   >