Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kernel-image-2.6-32
I have found a problem whereby all the 2.6.20-xx kernels cause a Sun
Ultra 40 I manage to hang on boot.
The system is running a fully patched Feisty desktop installation.
Nothing appears in the logs, the system completely freezes dur
Later releases fixed issue
** Changed in: live-com (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Flight 3 does not detect RTL8169 network card
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31472
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
u
Changed package hint...
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: kernel-latest-2.6-hppa => linux-source-2.6.20
--
Kernels 2.6.20 cause Ultra 40 to hang on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129714
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cupsys
Now and again cups seems to go into a spinloop (massively filling log
files) with the error "Too many open files".
Maybe related to cups bug #194368 which has recently been fixed (just a
new package needed?)
** Affects: cupsys (Ubuntu)
Impo
Ermm... sorry my fault.
I read a Red Hat update note, obviously the bug number relates to a Red
Hat bug tracker and noi a cups one.
Fedora Update Notification
FEDORA-2007-1219
2007-03-14
update notification is here:
http://lwn.net/Alerts/226296/
Bug described as:
- Prevent 'too many open file
Just to give an update on the severity - when this occurs the machine
grinds to a halt. It happened Friday and SMB clients failed (request
timeout) email timed out, postgres slowed to a crawl - the cups service
was using 100% and created a 3GB log file logging the error.
--
cups: Too many open fi
i am using Feisty (fully patched) - I assumed as the fix went into the
Red Hat release note for March it just took a long time to get around
to.
I didn't say it WAS that bug, just did a search and noticed that bug was
fixed in RD cups 1.2.8-1.fc5 and noticed that dpkg reports 1.fc5.
If thats not
Is there going to be an official backport/fix for Fiesty ?
--
MASTER [Feisty] cupsd leaking file descriptors (was: Multiple jobs are not
printed)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112803
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu
Is this expected to make it into 10.04 beta2? if not, is it expected to
be included in the final release?
--
New Apple iMac (Core i5) fails to boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542660
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Milestone = none? Does this mean the fix is not scheduled for the final
release?
--
New Apple iMac (Core i5) fails to boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542660
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
Lucid beta 1 fails to boot on my Apple iMac 27" (Core i5 model).
I am happily running Karmic (had to download backport Alsa to get sound
working), but Lucid beta 1 fails to boot. You initially see the new
purple Ubuntu loader, then it goes black - C
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41411277/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41411278/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41411279/Dependencies.txt
** A
Also affects upstream Debian 10/Buster (4.18.0-2-amd64)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723150
Title:
[Alienware Area-51 R2, Creative CA0132, Green Headphone Out, Front]
Very low fr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1723150 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723150
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1723150
[Alienware Area-51 R2, Creative CA0132, Green Headphone Out, Front] Very low
front headphones volume
--
You received this bug notification because
>From above comment
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2396042
Installed from latest Ubuntu Studio 18.04 ISO.
Boots to grub> prompt
Also fixed by copying /boot/efi/EFI/grub/grub.cfg to
/boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Now over 2 weeks without a failure, and up until this kernel it never
lasted anywhere near this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
[BTRFS] hard lockup on filserver
To man
Happy to close as fixed in 3.13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
[BTRFS] hard lockup on filserver
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
As my last posting hinted at, this was fixed in 3.6.0 - happy to close
off.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042369
Title:
SCSI bus errors with 3TB HDDs + data corruption
To manage no
This problem was not reproducible with the 3.12 kernel, happy to have
closed as fixed in 3.12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238658
Title:
rsync between two btrfs filesystems causes
** Description changed:
$ /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_memory -vvv
[extra-opts] check_memory -vvv
Running: '/usr/bin/free -b'
Output from /usr/bin/free:
- totalusedfree shared buff/cache
available
- Mem: 970764288 20107264013131776
Any idea when this package/fix is going to hit the Xenial repos? 23/07
and 16.04.1 and package still not available
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558196
Title:
ypbind not able to soc
Is this going to be back ported to Xenial ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579834
Title:
update-apt-xapian-index-dbus fails because of wrong import
To manage notifications about thi
Upgraded 11.10 KVM and NIS host to 12.04:
Unpacking nis (from .../nis_3.17-32ubuntu4_amd64.deb) ...
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/nis not found.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nis_3.17-32ubuntu4_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess new pre-installation script returned
Very painful issue - system NIS server non functional and whole network
is on a go slow (with timeouts), I do not know of a workaround. I tried
force etc. but it all still fails.
Interestingly nis installed on the clients - just seems to be this
server upgrade so it may be a dependency (?) type th
Still not resolved for the reason above
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431581
Title:
NIS does not start on 15.04
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
Still not fully resolved
** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431581
Title:
NIS does not start on 15.04
To manage no
Thanks Martin - good guess.
Oddly, all the machines were working previous (with several slaves),
probably for 2+ years with regular updates.
Anyway, thanks for the assistance, it's all working now as expected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Update : Just went onto a client NIS server that was running 14.10 and
checked the /etc/default/nis file and it was set to master, upgraded to
15.04 and it was changed to NISSERVER=false and all clients couldn't
bind.
Changed manually back to NISSERVER=master and all is OK.
Looks like the upgrade
2 weeks to go an this still has not even been assigned or triaged?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431581
Title:
NIS does not install on 15.04
To manage notifications about this bug
NIS client now starts correctly:
/usr/sbin/ypbind -no-dbus
However on our NIS slave the NIS server is not starting:
ps -ef | grep ypserv
If I start manually> ypserv - it is fine and works as expected:
/usr/sbin/ypbind -no-dbus
ypserv
ypwhich
myserver.mydomain.co.uk
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
After upgrade to 15.04 network services were not working as expected.
Investigation showed NIS was removed during the upgrade and installation
fails with unmet dependencies:
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
nis : Depends: upstart (>= 0.9.7-2)
** Affects: ubun
Update of upstart last night now progresses installation, however
failure is now:
Need to get 0 B/152 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 591467 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to u
Synch'd against the latest packages (which I believe is beta2) - problem
still present
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431581
Title:
NIS does not install on 15.04
To manage notificat
Looks like this is purely the startup - I start bind manually and it all
works fine and dandy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431581
Title:
NIS does not install on 15.04
To manage n
Sorry Joseph, I should have been clearer. It was with the mainline
kernel 3.12.0-999-generic #201310090426, I never gor around to trying
the rc5 kernel as you suggested - this is my company fileserver so I
cannot just do immediate changes (unless of course it has just crashed
and I am recovering).
I am experiencing this with around 7 Ubuntu (unity) desktop installs -
is the bug as reported just affecting XFCE?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190990
Title:
Xfce4 mess up with ico
Upgraded to 3.12.0-999-generic #201310210405 and still get lockups and
still with absolutely nothing on the kernel logs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
hard lockup on f
Situation is intolerable, crashed 2nd time in 12 hrs:
top - 12:06:37 up 1:51, 1 user, load average: 3.33, 0.87, 0.33
Tasks: 226 total, 5 running, 221 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 48.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.9 id, 0.1 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem: 12295372 total, 121
Filled a bug on Kernel.Org -
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63571
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #63571
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63571
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Now running 3.13.0-031300rc3-generic (from Mainline/Trusty RC) and have
had the longest continual uptime since moving to 3.11 (i.e. upgraded to
Ubuntu 13.10) - 8 days.
Will keep and eye on the situation, but I also have had backups running
and so far it looks stable.
Will continue to monitor.
--
Done.
Good luck
Regards
Sean Clarke
-
SEC Consulting Limited
Phone: +44 (0)23 8040 5599
Website: http://www.sec-consulting.co.uk
Email: sean.cla...@sec-consulting.co.uk
On 26 September 2015 at 18:32, Christopher M. Penalver <
christopher.m.pe
Public bug reported:
Since upgrading to latest kernel (4.2.0-11-generic) multi screen setup
no longer works. It does seem intermittant, but in 9/10 cases it will
not drive triple monitor setup, however with some unplugging and
replugging of the DP one screen "may" appear which mirrors the local
di
Public bug reported:
I am compiling some of my existing small apps in Ubuntu 15.10 and I am
getting what looks like ABI errors when linking against the packaged
libodb and libodg-pgsql.
I downloaded the source and compiled libodb-pgsql with the provided
g++5.2 and it seems to work fine, so at a f
** Tags added: ubuntu-15.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492755
Title:
ABI issues when used in 15.10
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt
Same issue in Dell XPS 2013 however XPS 2015 is unaffected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492764
Title:
[drm:intel_pipe_config_compare [i915]] *ERROR* mismatch in ips_enabled
(exp
Just to confirm I have updated to the official release and although nis
does now start without error, the ypserve process does not get started
(as described above) meaning that NIS clients work, but NIS server
master and slaves do not work properly.
--
You received this bug notification because
See if this fixes it for you as root:
apt-get update
apt-get clean
apt-get install -fy
dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
dpkg --configure -a
apt-get install -fy
apt-get dist-upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1268257 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257
Public bug reported:
Got crash when restarted laptop - as soon as I logged into Ubuntu, unity
started and the crash dialog appeared.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: nvidia-331-upd
Public bug reported:
After running 14.04 LTS through beta etc. I updated to teh latest this
morning and all was well. I then went into a running container, changed
it's sources.list to pint to the trusty repos and upgraded (the
container itself was running 13.10).
All went well, I restart the con
When teh container is hung and i execute an lxc-stop (from a different
terminal) I see a:
mount: cannot mount block device /export/lxc-lib//rootfs read-only
Might be connected?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Yes, that works!
Many thanks for your help.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307431
Title:
LXC containers fail to start when upgraded to 14.04 LTS
To manage notifications about this
Public bug reported:
Evince appears to ignore a printers default, last and other paper size
details, here is the scenario...
Printer One is an A4 printer and it's paper size is A4
Printer Two is an A3 printer and it's paper size is A3
Printer Three is an A1 plotter and it's paper size is A1
A PD
Problem also present when using Java 8.
My users report this is their number 1 annoyance with our Java
applications.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601871
Title:
doesn't print corect
Fixed in 14.04 (3.13 kernel)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
[BTRFS] hard lockup on filserver
To mana
Fixed in 14.04 (3.13 kernel)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
[BTRFS] hard lockup on filserver
To m
13.04 was installed without issue, I don't have an iMac anymore so
cannot test against 14.04.
Happy to have bug (and duplicates) closed if no one else shouts their
problem exists in 13.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Not present in later release, can we close as fixed upstream?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983543
Title:
Internal Error, No file name for libc6
To manage notifications about this b
Public bug reported:
Hi,
My Core i7 18TB BTRFS file server has been upgraded to 13.10 and since
doing so locks up frequently. Previously it never crashed and was only taken
down for maintenance, Monday we upgraded to 13.10 and since then it locks up
ever 20hrs or so. We were doing a large
Output from:
ubuntu-bug linux
** Attachment added: "Ouput from ubuntu-bug linux"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1237794/+attachment/3871367/+files/apport.linux-image-3.11.0-12-generic.ulc9k4.apport
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
Last nights/this mornings lock up had nothing logged:
Oct 9 20:20:48 enterprise sm-notify[867]: Unable to notify
starbug.sec-consulting.co.uk, giving up
Oct 9 20:20:48 enterprise sm-notify[867]: Unable to notify
subversion.sec-consulting.co.uk, giving up
Oct 9 20:27:49 enterprise kernel: [ 13
Output from:
ubuntu-bug linux
** Attachment added: "output from ubuntu-bug linux"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1238658/+attachment/3874452/+files/apport.linux-image-3.11.0-12-generic.ulc9k4.apport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Now running mainline kernel (3.12.0-999-generic #201310090426) and
restesting
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
hard lockup on filserver
To manage notifications about thi
Now running mainline kernel (3.12.0-999-generic #201310090426) and
restest
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238658
Title:
rsync between two btrfs filesystems causes machines to crash w
Public bug reported:
Using the latest 13.10 (kernel 3.11.0-12-generic) we performed a backup
which is essentially an rsync from a 6 disk array to a USB HDD - both
are BTRFS filesystems
After several hours the machine was unresponsive and the screen full of
out of memory errors and killing lots of
OK, system has run perfectly since I installed the 3.12.0-999-generic
#201310090426 kernel.
Changing status as instructed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
hard lockup on
Not status (sorry) adding tag.
** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
hard lockup on filserver
To manage notifications about this bug go
Installed 3.12.0-999-generic #201310090426 kernel and backup runs and
completes as expected.
Adding tag as instructed
** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
hard lockup on filserver
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238658
Title:
rsync between two btrfs filesystems causes machines to crash with
** Tags removed: kernel-fixed-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238658
Title:
rsync between two btrfs filesystems causes machines to crash with
symptoms of memory leak
To ma
OK, after a week of further testing I don't think the issue is resolved.
I am moving about 150GB of data around and the system gives hard locks.
Nothing in the syslog, however I had a top running at failure and the
BTRFS processes went through the roof:
000 R 100.0 0.0 0:51.50 [btrf
OK, it is reproducible - I have a filserver with 6x 3TB in a BTRFS RAID
1+0 configuration.
>From a client (and using NFS) I copy a 95GB tar file from the fileserver
to a USB HD.
It seems at the very end (when BTRFS deletes the 95GB file on the server
it falls over - btrfs-transaction and btrfs-fl
OK, it is reproducible - I have a filserver with 6x 3TB in a BTRFS RAID
1+0 configuration.
>From a client (and using NFS) I copy a 95GB tar file from the fileserver
to a USB HD.
It seems at the very end (when BTRFS deletes the 95GB file on the server
it falls over - btrfs-transaction and btrfs-fl
Installed 3.12.0-999-generic #201310170405 and retrying.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237794
Title:
hard lockup on filserver
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
Installed 3.12.0-999-generic #201310170405 and retrying.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238658
Title:
rsync between two btrfs filesystems causes machines to crash with
symptoms of
Public bug reported:
This should be simple enough to reproduce..
Essential I have 2 machines, an NFS server and single client - I
configure rhe client to use nfs v3 and it all works fine, i can
rsync1.5+TB of data without issue.
Change client to use nfs v4 and the system hangs - if i use TCP
I receive these errors, however on my system(s) it is accompanied by a
network dropout - Is this not a genuine bug related to debian bug
#669184
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669184
[37288.613730] kvm: 2620: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0xc0010001
[37922.460334] nfs: server enterpris
No information received from upstream regarding bug report - very
disappointing considering the seriousness of this bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042369
Title:
SCSI bus errors w
I see that 12.10 beta 1 has been released and this contains an updated
kernel (3.5.0-14), is it worth testing with this or as I have confirmed
the bug is in the 3.6 upstream release there is no need.
Still no response from upstream, should this bug not be marked as
critical as it has been reproduc
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I am building a NAS unit with 6x Seagate 3TB HDDs. When using the drives I
get a flood of errors in the kernel log.
I have replaced the motherboard and even upgraded to 12.10 'Quantal
Quetzal' and still the broblem remains.
Aug 25 19:06:58 enterprise kernel: [ 595
More erros from the syslog
Aug 27 20:55:53 enterprise kernel: [ 3444.340015] sd 0:0:0:0: [sdc]
Aug 27 20:55:53 enterprise kernel: [ 3444.340016] Sense Key : Aborted Command
[current] [descriptor]
Aug 27 20:55:53 enterprise kernel: [ 3444.340021] Descriptor sense data with
sense descriptors (i
apport-collect data to follow - I need to reconfigure network since
changing motherboard.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042369
Title:
SCSI bus errors with 3TB HDDs + data corruption
Updated 12.10 kernel to current (3.5.0-12-generic #12-Ubuntu SMP)
When I insert disks they get recognised as:
[ 513.407420] ata6: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
[ 513.407496] ata6: hard resetting link
[ 515.646653] ata6: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
[ 515.654462] ata6.
kernel-unable-to-test-upstream at present
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042369
Title:
SCSI bus errors with 3TB
OK - network now operation and tested with 3.6.0 rc3:
eg linux-
headers-3.6.0-030600rc3-generic_3.6.0-030600rc3.201208221735_amd64
Bug still exists: kernel-bug-exists-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
More info:
/usr/bin/lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RD890 PCI to PCI
bridge (external gfx0 port B) (rev 02)
00:02.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RD890 PCI to PCI
bridge (PCI express gpp port B)
00:04.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD]
#Benjamin Tegge (livewirebt) - I have 2 "models" of ST3000DM001...
1 off ST3000DM001-1CH166
5 off ST3000DM001-9YN166
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042369
Title:
SCSI bus errors wi
I have not filed an upstream bug before - I have read the instructions
from your link (thanks) who is the maintainer for this area who I email
the report to?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042369
Title:
SCSI bus errors with 3TB HDDs + data corruption
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so
Interestingly I have a Thecus NAS running a modified 2.6.33.7 kernel -
and it recognised and formatted one of the 3TB drives and I was able to
copy 300+GB of data to it without any errors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Anyone "in the know" want to look at this ti see if this is related or
similar? it does talk of ext3 specifics, but might be worth a look:
View topic - [SOLVED] kernel 3.5 towo produces filesystem errors ..
http://siduction.org/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=2613
--
You received this b
Ok progress
I downloaded the latest main branch kernel (3.6.0-030600rc5-generic
#201209082035 SMP Sun Sep 9 00:36:02) and I no longer get bus resets!!!
It isn't all plain sailing, I did notice that the hot swappable function
didn't appear to work (when I inserted disks Linux did not detect it
Still present in 11.04, 11.10 and 12.04 (development) - also, changing
to Oracle Java 7 has no effect.
I can't ascertain if we are looking at a Java bug or a Java->Gnome bug.
i suspect the latter, as on other systems where i have different
printers installed I see correct default page size selecti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 856583 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856583
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 856583
disabled networkmanager replaces resolv.conf with null
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Yes, can confirm - happens on a dozen desktops and servers I manage.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856583
Title:
disabled networkmanager replaces resolv.conf with null
To manage not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 856583 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856583
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 856583
disabled networkmanager replaces resolv.conf with null
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 155689 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155689
Still present in 10.04.2 (2.6.32-32-generic-pae #62-Ubuntu SMP )
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 155689
nuking initramfs contents: Kernel panic at boot
--
You received this bug notificatio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 784335 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 784335
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Is there an appropriate work around, patch or kernel for test with a
fix? I have several P55 Core i% systems with this NIC and they are
displaying this fault - crashes can be weekly or even daily.
At a push I can try the PPA, but these are production systems.
--
You received this bug notificatio
Bug derived from this?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32962
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #32962
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32962
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
