On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 09:59:04PM -, Student Driver wrote:
> Same issue for my Dell Mini 9, using the proprietary broadcom-wl driver
> and NetworkManager 0.7.1 (PPA) in Jaunty UNR.
>
this is not your bug. Its almost certainly a driver bug - which
unfortunately can only be fixed by broadcom.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 07:37:34PM -, yang_yi_cn wrote:
> Updates:
>
> 1. Remove n improves, but not eliminates the problem. I was testing
> using ping, which can reach 0% packet loss if you are not doing anything
> else. However, if you have too much Internet activity, such as download
> larg
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:18:18PM -, yang_yi_cn wrote:
> @Krzysztof Janowicz : setting the router from '802.11g and 802.11n' to
> '11g only' solved the problem.
>
> It seems to work for me by change to g only at the router setting, at
> least improves a lot. Will do more testing.
>
yes, the
Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> The patch at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
> manager/+bug/64173/comments/12 actually didn't work for me. I still get
> all the disconnects.
I hope you have understood that the patch itself will not change
anything in network-manager, unless you use
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 05:49:53PM -, Fionn wrote:
> More so if you would place a hint in the not yet existing man-page for
> network-manager (possibly along with some instructions on how to restart
> network-manager properly because it tends to get stuck on some dbus
> queue congestion issue a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:20:11AM -, Kansei wrote:
> Also confirming that this still exists in Gutsy Tribe 3..
>
> confirmed on:
> ThinkPad T42 (IBM A/B/G Atheros / madwifi)
> Dell Latitude D620 (Intel 3945 ipw3945)
> Vaio S-series (Intel 2200 ipw2200)
>
Can you please try if manually setti
Alexander Sack wrote:
> For the patch ... its much appreciated, but making a user-defined
> variable out of this isn't the right way to go imo. In the end it
> would only help expert users, which is not what we want.
Well, changing a hardcoded value to some other hardcoded value isnt
exactly eleg
Lars M Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Although I am the guy who created this bug report, I'm beginning to feel
> like I have to come to the defence of NetworkManager here :)
> [...]
> I have never seen networkmanager completely break an existing connection
> with an access point and go through the whole
My problem is gone too. Problem was in two or more networks on the same
channel. AP was restarting randomly - problem wasn't caused by NM or
ipw3945.
--
Wireless network keeps reconnecting (ubuntu edgy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64173
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
It strikes me that the patch is perhaps not being applied for
political reasons. What's important is that the highest proportion of
users are able to utilise Ubuntu. It's unfortunate but true that users
don't really care about the how and why of the politics, only that the
system works
Can we
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 09:21, Kansei wrote:
> Working Atheros and Intel wireless with WEP/WPA/WPA2-AES support is most
> definitely _critical_ for a new release. If not, ditch networkmanager
> (what else is there that compares? I have CLI scripts that work great
> but that's not doable for most ub
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 17:50 +, mowerm wrote:
> I've recently reverted back to the network manager package offered by
> Fionn after he explained the process of forcing a version in synaptic.
> Setting the timeout to 3 (30sec) has prevented disconnects
> (completely so far). Is there a publi
I encourage those interested in this ticket to consider commenting on
the upstream ticket, in the Gnome bug tracking system:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418065
At least one developer for NetworkManager receives the bug mail from
that, but I'm not sure that any NetworkManager develop
On Do, 2007-03-29 at 02:10 +, pterandon wrote:
> Edgy 6.10 worked fine on my box.
>
> Feisty 7.04 beta does not connect to my WEP-encrypted network.
>
> Here's some useful data: I was able to connect to my neighbor's
> unencrypted (and very weak) wifi signal intermittently as a test. My
> g
Hi Mark,
Thanks for getting back to me. I should probably just follow the
instructions on the thread and maybe learn a little something about
patches :)
Margaret
On 3/26/07, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 19:38 +, Margaret McGaley wrote:
> > Hi Fionn,
> >
>
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 19:38 +, Margaret McGaley wrote:
> Hi Fionn,
>
> Thanks for creating the patch. Have you sent it to the NetworkManager
> team?
Margaret,
There is a corresponding bug in the NetworkManager bug queue upstream,
and I've made them aware of this patch.
In the short term, I
16 matches
Mail list logo
