see my comment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/864750/comments/34
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kerne
Subjectively, the system chokes more under load (unresponsive to local
input, etc). nolapic_timer is not a complete fix: I can reproducibly
oops my machine ("transmit queue 0 timed out") in less than a second,
just by using iperf, even with nolapic_timer.
--
You received this bug notification bec
nolapic_timer seems to fix the problem for me too (which I have been
experiencing on my 11.10 system). what side effects should I watch for
when using this option?
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Paul R. <784...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> "nolapic_timer" is the best kernel parameter. It enable
"nolapic_timer" is the best kernel parameter. It enables SMP, but still
stops the MCE panics, "softirq_pending", etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utiliz
I have been plagued by this too: the kernel's r8169 driver would panic
with machine-check-exceptions after about 300KB of transfer, while the
Realtek r8168 driver would similarly panic after ~4GB. I'm having good
luck so far after adding "nolapic" to my kernel command line, to disable
the local API
I can no longer reproduce this issue with the oneiric kernel, so I'll go
ahead and close.
(For those of you that are still having issues, whatever issue you're
having is apparently different from mine, so please file a new bug)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Release
I see that Arie has tried Oneiric. Has anyone else having this issue
tried Oneiric?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? It
will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . If possible, please test
the latest release candidate kernel (Not a kernel in the daily
directory). Once you'
Limiting the link speed to 100 Mbps seems to solve the "link up"
messages in my kernel log. So far no kernel panic with a big NFS file
copy, but I'm only getting 2.4 MiB/s transfer speed. Still, this is
about the same or a little bit better than as I was getting before
limiting the link speed.
On
I also have an ASUS E35M1 but in the MicroATX version. I just bought it
and did a lot of troubleshooting with the Realtek network before
discovering this thread. I had the same multiple "nohz
local_softirq_pending" and "link up" (without any corresponding "link
down" or link issues).
Anyway, after
I'm running a AMD Fusion embedded motherboard with a Realtek gigabit
adapter and I experience the same problem.
Link to my motherboard:
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_CPU_on_Board/E35M1I/#specifications
The specs list "Realtek® 8111E , 1 x Gigabit LAN Controller".
"lspci" states: "Realtek
I have a System76 Pangolin Performance Pan-p4n with the same r8169
chipset problem. I've confirmed that this bug doesn't exist in Maverick
10.10 with the 2.6.35-28 kernel. The bug is in Maverick 2.6.35-30 and
every Natty kernel I've tried up until 2.6.38-10. I found a temporary
solution to stop the
I tried the kernel 3.0 and it (3.0.0-7.9, pinned from oneiric) and it
only made things worse. The computer now lockups completely, without
even "eth0: link up" in dmesg or on-screen kernel stack trace. It takes
couple of days to reach that, with heavy CPU, disk and network load.
I then disabled th
The bug is related to Active State Power Management (ASPN) support and
is supposed to be retracted from the 3.0 kernel due to problems it
causes: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/23/496
Can someone confirm that 3.0 is free of this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
I'm not really a developer - I know the realtek driver fixes this, and
as far as I can tell it's not a blob? Shouldn't Canonical just grab
the working driver and put it in the repos or something?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Hi,
I kinda "solved" the problem by using an old kernel from the previous
distribution... At least i got the server up and running...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Hea
Essentially - "me too", including the "link up" line.
[27358.595318] r8169 :13:00.0: eth0: link up
Kernel 2.6.38-8-server x86_64.
Attaching screenshot of the panic.
** Attachment added: "rtl8169_kernel2.6.39_crash.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/784335/+attachmen
I think it now has been bugported to 2.6.35-30.51 ? I started seeing
the symptom on Maverick, it went away when I bugverted to 2.6.35-28.
Um, I kind of think that networking is an important feature... I have 2
Gigabyte EP45-UD3R motherboards that have this failure... In light of
the "unassigned" s
Using kernel 2.6.38-10-generic #44 Ubuntu, x64 (stock from ubuntu
11.04), on HP dv6-3180 I'm getting this too (also the "Link up" message
from #4). Below is a (hopefully relevant) part of the kernel panic
message (might contain typos):
Kernel panic...: Fatal exception in interrupt
Call trace:
pa
Bug derived from this?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32962
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #32962
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32962
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Is there an appropriate work around, patch or kernel for test with a
fix? I have several P55 Core i% systems with this NIC and they are
displaying this fault - crashes can be weekly or even daily.
At a push I can try the PPA, but these are production systems.
--
You received this bug notificatio
I think I was having this problem as well. I added the Kernal PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~kernel-ppa/+archive/ppa) to get 2.26.39
installed and didn't seem to get the oops. I will do some further
testing on both kernels when I get back home to confirm.
--
You received this bug notification beca
Folks, please don't "me too" bug reports. At the top of the page,
there's a "This bug affects ..." link. Click on that, and let us know
the bug affects you that way!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
I've had exactly the same problem on both i386 & x86_64 on an intel atom
330 home server. Stock 11.04 in both cases. Problem disappears if
ethernet limited to 100mpbs. Sounds like exactly the same issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
seconded, I have the exact same problem on a Lenovo Thinkpad Edge 13",
stock 11.04 x86_64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to ke
Apport, you're confused.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to
Thank you for your report!
However, processing it in order to get sufficient information for the
developers failed (it does not generate an useful symbolic stack trace). This
might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system
at the time of the report:
linux
Please upg
when connected on 100mbps - system is stable, no strange messages in dmesg.
on 100mbps - transfer ~ 95mbps, on 1000mbps ~ 40mpbs and oops
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
the same problem on dell vostro 3700.
after connecting to network via wired connection with 1gbps connection - i've
got in my dmesg
[27348.520585] r8169 :13:00.0: eth0: link up
[27348.642945] r8169 :13:00.0: eth0: link up
[27348.909579] r8169 :13:00.0: eth0: link up
[27349.178892] r81
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Hmph. I guess that's what I get for letting apport-retrace at my LP
credentials.
I've collected the information that I think should be equivalent to what
apport-retrace would have.
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/784335/+attachment/214032
Thank you for your report!
However, processing it in order to get sufficient information for the
developers failed (it does not generate an useful symbolic stack trace). This
might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system
at the time of the report:
linux
Please upg
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335
Title:
Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
34 matches
Mail list logo
