I just demoted reportbug and the -el bits.
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:07:01PM -, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Matt, what's the current status of the TB discussion about demoting
> reportbug? Is there anything else you want to see changed?
I already unseeded dpkg-dev-el, which was the only thing keeping it in main.
It's just pending action from
Matt, what's the current status of the TB discussion about demoting
reportbug? Is there anything else you want to see changed?
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
that's an immense improvement, thanks! would still love to work
entirely from ocmmand-line but this is almost as good.
mp
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:00 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Just as a small status update, since yesterday apport ships an 'ubuntu-
> bug' program in /usr/bin which allows you to
Just as a small status update, since yesterday apport ships an 'ubuntu-
bug' program in /usr/bin which allows you to file a bug against the
distro (with just 'ubuntu-bug') or a package ('ubuntu-bug -p package').
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.n
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:07:21PM -, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Matt, what was the outcome of the TB discussion? I couldn't join that
> meeting, sorry.
The meeting ran very late (2 hours), so we didn't finish the discussion, and
agreed to carry on by email. I'll CC you on the discussion.
--
- m
Matt, what was the outcome of the TB discussion? I couldn't join that
meeting, sorry.
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:44:57AM -, auspex wrote:
> What? There can be less confusion not having reportbug for dpkg-dev-el,
> than from having a reportbug that has _never_, for the entire life of
> Ubuntu, worked as it should?
>
> imo, removing reportbug from the distribution is the only wa
What? There can be less confusion not having reportbug for dpkg-dev-el,
than from having a reportbug that has _never_, for the entire life of
Ubuntu, worked as it should?
imo, removing reportbug from the distribution is the only way this bug
is ever going to get closed.
--
Ubuntu bug reporting
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:16:24PM -, auspex wrote:
> I agree with Monty that it's nice that a way to submit bugs exist, but
> this bug is about reportbug & bug-buddy. As it is now, if it's a KDE
> bug, I submit it via the KDE gui, to KDE, and skip Ubuntu. If the help
> menus start pointing t
There is no problem with bug-buddy and apport is used for GNOME on
feisty
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I agree with Monty that it's nice that a way to submit bugs exist, but
this bug is about reportbug & bug-buddy. As it is now, if it's a KDE
bug, I submit it via the KDE gui, to KDE, and skip Ubuntu. If the help
menus start pointing to this tool, then it'll go to launchpad, and
that's great - but
Hi,
Monty Taylor [2007-01-27 8:07 -]:
> On 1/26/07, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:08:59AM -, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > > Great that progress is being made. However, that sounds like a
> > > graphical tool
> >
> > It is a library with a graphical fr
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 08:07:15AM -, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 1/26/07, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:08:59AM -, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > > Great that progress is being made. However, that sounds like a
> > > graphical tool
> >
> > It is a library w
On 1/26/07, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:08:59AM -, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > Great that progress is being made. However, that sounds like a
> > graphical tool
>
> It is a library with a graphical front-end...
>
> > Happy to help with that, by the way.
>
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:08:59AM -, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Great that progress is being made. However, that sounds like a
> graphical tool
It is a library with a graphical front-end...
> Happy to help with that, by the way.
...for which a command-line front-end could be written. Note that
Great that progress is being made. However, that sounds like a
graphical tool, which I agree is nice, but makes similar activities
difficult for those of us trying to run Ubuntu servers. Is there
progress towards making something like reportbug still work? I think
those of us doing server stuff wou
This bug is well on its way to being fixed; apport in feisty now has the
basic elements of an enhanced bug reporting tool, accessible via
Help->Report a bug. It needs some additional entry points, e.g. to
launch with a specified package name without launching the application.
** Changed in: Ubunt
now famous: http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2007/01/26/use-reportbug-to-
report-bugs-better/
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu
Also see #42673 (apt-listbugs should also consult ubuntu bug tracking
system besides debian's one)
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
** Description changed:
- I downloaded and installed ubuntu 6.10 today. During the install process this
error box appearred twice "install aborted () filles failed" and over the box
it said to enclude this "/var/log/dist-upgrade/. Each time I cleared the box
the install continued. Later anothe
** Description changed:
- This includes bug-buddy and reportbug. bug-buddy can talk to bugzilla, I
think,
- so it should be modified to point to our bugzilla. reportbug can't, I don't
- think, so we need an email gateway for that, and it needs to be configured to
- send email.
-
- We can't hav
Did someone implement MaloneXMLRPC in reportbug and bug-buddy in edgy?
I'm using dapper.
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-b
** Bug 51937 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
If reportbug did this for edgy, that would be stunning. Better yet, once
we test it in edgy, I propose we backport this to dapper and breezy, to
fix the problem once and for all.
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
Would it be useful to make bug-buddy and/or reportbug work with a Malone
XMLRPC filebug interface? If so, or in case anyone else doing bug
reporting tool things is interested, the Malone filebug xmlrpc interface
is in production.
https://help.launchpad.net/MaloneXMLRPC
It still has restrictions
Though Bug Buddy appears to be removed from the default Ubuntu menus, it
is still integrated into Evolution, and maybe others.
For instance:
Evolution: Launch Evolution, click Help -> Submit a Bug Report; Hello
Bug Buddy (and it looks to deliver to Gnome Bugzilla, because the recent
bugs filed p
There seems to be some new activity to develop a bugreporting tool -
webbased with commandline-iface and gui - as I mentioned in my earlier
comment, here are the links:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/bug-reporting-tool
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugReportingTool
Does anybody know someth
The first URL you gave (the launchpad one) includes a status field which
provides that information if available.
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
I switched from Debian to Ubuntu on my laptop, and am 95% happy with it.
The 5% is that there's no easy way to report bugs, so I cannot easily
contribute to improving Ubuntu.
In Debian, I used M-x report-bug in Emacs, and it was easy. In Ubuntu,
the Emacs interface is gone (M-x report-debian-bug
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Assignee: Scott James Remnant => (unassigned)
--
Ubuntu bug reporting tools need to point to Ubuntu bug systems
https://launchpad.net/bugs/7839
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I read the article about the new BugReportingTool BERT in the wiki, and
I'm quite happy about the new(?) activity to develop a similar tool as
reportbug in the debian BTS for malone:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugReportingTool?highlight=%28bugreport%29
This is very impressive and promising.
Thanks
I too express disbelif that reportbug still is not integrated into the
rest of the Ubuntu bug reporting infrastructure. I've come to expect
now, that it never will.
Whilst reportbug is useless for reporting bugs to Ubuntu, it is
extremely useful for peole like myself that provide 3rd party Ubuntu
"...is quite not(?) understandable."
Why reinventing the wheel by develop a commandline interface (we need one)
without respecting the good aspects of reportbug? BTW, reportbug is very well
integrated in the debian BTS, and you don't need something else beside than a
working MUA.
Is there any de
I've filed bugs via reportbug. I've _never_ received a confirmation,
let alone instruction to use Launchpad. Frankly, one of the reasons
people will use reportbug is because it's a whole lot easier than trying
to figure out how to submit a bug in Launchpad (I've submitted about a
half-dozen throu
An update of the current process.
We receive on average around 3 or 4 bug reports per day via reportbug,
stuck in the mailing list moderation queue.
Then Corey Burger forwards them to me once a day. Every few days I do
some basic bug triage on this pile of accumulated bug reports, and file
the
Many of the ideas and plans discussed in this thread are good ones, but
the current reportbug is worse than useless -- it is actively harmful to
community contributions, unless Corey Burger continues to manually catch
all bug reports sent by reportbug.
Please remove reportbug from edgy *now*. Put
37 matches
Mail list logo
