** Changed in: gnome-screensaver
Status: New => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33753
Title:
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33753
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
So I see the saga continues, 8.04 is shipped with open-gl screensavers
by default, so I constantly have to restart X... (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
screensaver/+bug/71030/comments/9)
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33753
> Yet its a much smaller group of users that even cares or changes the
> screensaver.
I don't agree, I find many people are impressed by the included screensavers,
and it's one of the first thing a curious desktop user would like to customize
and play with...
Ralf, several 3D-crashing bugs have
Sorry I meant bug #16873 and not 16773.
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
You are right.
Yet its a much smaller group of users that even cares or changes the
screensaver. At least a freshly installed PC with an 'old' ati card or
matrox card won't randomly crash now. I know, the drivers are to blame,
but the drivers don't promise stable 3d support.
And well, I wouldn't
gnome-screensaver should currently be set to the floating ubuntulogo
screensaver by default ... that fixes the symptom for fresh installs,
but indeed the bug is still present ...
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
> Then we can close this bug..
IMO, the bug would still be valid, because if the screensaver is set to
"Random" it should not cause extreme CPU utilisation.
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
In feisty: It seems by default the screensavers are set to just blank
the screen now.
But its been a while since I installed feisty. Can some one confirm
this?
Then we can close this bug..
Black screen by default seems a very acceptable solution.
It just means that with a default installation the
Rodrigo, could you have a look at this long-standing issue and see if
something can be done for Feisty? The upstream bug has an outline of
what needs to be done, but it's a low priority for them.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Target: later => None
--
don't use OpenGL savers i
** Description changed:
- the current selection doesn't contain any 2D screen savers; on hardware,
- which doesn't support 3D graphics, that's just annoying. the screen
- saver disables any power management and makes the computer behave like a
- vacuum cleaner.
-
- proposed solution:
- - include
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Target: None => later
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
> No, this is a buggy hardware or buggy upstream drivers issue, because
> system should never crash - stability should never depend on some
> software, which user can start, like 3D game or screensaver.
It's both an packaging issue of opengl as well as driver issue with
xorg. Its that the screensa
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:33:05PM -, Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen wrote:
> I have had several matrox, intel and ati based graphics cards that with
> the default install would CRASH upon about half of the opengl-
> screensavers.
So, this is your hardware or upstream xorg drivers bug.
> If the scr
I have had several matrox, intel and ati based graphics cards that with
the default install would CRASH upon about half of the opengl-
screensavers.
If the screensavers that require 3D are in seperate packages, why are
they even installed by default and/or available on a live-desktop. This
is a pa
Okay, meanwhile, why does ubuntu ship a screensaver by default? Why not
just blank the screen?! And this applies ESPECIALLY to the liveCD. The
screensaver does not start during the install (as I previously suggested
in some other bug) but it still starts in normal operation in the
liveCD. It uses p
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (upstream)
Status: Unknown => Unconfirmed
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Bug 54843 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Bug 42406 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
** Bug 49441 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
don't use OpenGL savers if no hardware support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/33753
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
I've forwarded this upstream, and changed the title accordingly (since
2D savers have been in for quite some time):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359592
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #359592
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359592
** Also affects: gnome-screensave
20 matches
Mail list logo
